Web Help

Gianni (http://i.am/gianni) needs new media producers to provide content for the following web sites. The sites are on-line now only to the most spiritually open surfers. Most links currently point to the same web page, eventually to be rationalised.... Please send your comments to

gianni@earthling.net

http://listen.to/holysongs

http://gonow.to/spiritworld

http://welcome.to/spiritworld

http://messages.to/spiritworld

http://i.am/psychic

http://messages.to/psychic

http://i.am/clairvoyant

http://messages.to/clairvoyant

http://i.am/dreamcatcher

http://messages.to/dreamcatcher

Victory at MSG: The 2000-Voice Choir

by Rev. Adruma Victoria-NYC

All praises and glory to God as I attempt to share how Christ and the Holy Spirit brought the victory at Blessing ’98 through the 2000-voice choir.

Long before we did anything, God and True Parents paved the way for the saints of heaven and earth to rally to the call of the God-centered family. With Heavenly Father pushing my wife and personal messiah Fiona and I to go to Kenya, our nation of providence, we knew clearly it was time. Yet it had been two decades since I could make a substantial offering to God in America, where I was born.

I told my sons Justin and Alex that after Hoon Dok Hae every morning, I was going to do some running. Justin suggested that I run around Madison Square Garden, as a condition for victory, so two to three days a week I would run four to seven times around the Garden. It seems that God accepted my offering.

Just before Fiona left for Kenya with Ashia and Kiah, two of our four children, I spoke with David Eaton and asked if there was a need for Performing Arts support for Blessing ’98. He said there just might be something I could do to help out.

I understand that at Barrytown, Rev. Levy Daugherty of Norfolk VA first came up with the inspiration of a thousand-voice choir to perform at the Blessing. David said that when Family Federation for World Peace and Unification General Secretary Neil Albert Salonen returned from Uganda, we would see about my coming on board as an associate. Having worked with David for the Yankee Stadium and Washington Monument campaigns, I explained my qualifications as an entertainment producer for the World CARP Convention 1987 in Berlin. Praise God, my brother believed in me; and on April 29 I met with David Eaton, Rev. Yang of Washington DC and Dr. Tyler Hendricks, who welcomed me to the task.

Dr. Hendricks explained that we wanted to put together a thousand-voice choir and needed a few appropriate songs. I thought the songs should be exciting, yet simple, so that many voices which had never before sung together could learn them. I suggested "Amazing Grace" and a contemporary version of "Kumbaya." Dr. Hendricks liked my impromptu performance.

David Eaton indicated that we needed a music director and choir director. That night we got on the phone and pulled in Mr. Horace Donnell as music director. I thought he was the best choice, because he had been my high school teacher and was the music director at my own Blessing at Madison Square Garden in 1982. One of my requests to David was that my support team would include my sister Sandra Lowen, who wrote so many beautiful and inspiring songs in our church. I just wanted the honorable root of our Black membership in our True Parents’ kingdom to be with me as this grace of Father God touches His children.

Choir Director

Now we needed a choir director. I went to a National Action Network (NAN) Prayer Breakfast in Harlem and met Bishop Billings. I asked him if he had a choir director, to which he answered "Angela Moses." I had brought a tape of the songs I thought would be good, and I gave them to Angela’s secretary, Monique McAllistair. When she spoke about Ms. Moses, I felt the tingle of the Holy Spirit. I called Ms. Moses and shared about the idea of the thousand-voice choir. She said, "I bet you don’t have a woman on your list." I said, "Yes, we do." When I mentioned famous folks, she said humbly, ‘Well, I guess you’d better choose them; they’re famous." Yet I had the thought in my mind that a worthy person without great recognition would be just fine.

I decided to go to New Life Tabernacle to check their choir that Tuesday. The following Sunday, Rev. Joong Hyun Pak and Dr. Hendricks heard them and were quite inspired.

When I entered New Life Tabernacle, the congregation welcomed me warmly, and I said, "Let’s pray, so that our time together will be in God’s hands." They freely offered love and respect to the person they never saw before. When they sang, I felt proud to be Black. I told them they should be on a global level, as they were so filled with the Holy Ghost power and heart. I said, "You’ve all heard of the Spike Lee movie He Got Game? Well, when it comes to NLT, ‘They got God’!" Then I met the wonderful Angela Moses, pure and lovely in the Lord. Angela prayed, "Dear God, you know why Brother Adruma came here. Please bless him, Lord." And He did.

I knew God chose this choir and Angela to lead the thousand-voice choir to victory at Madison Square Garden. Yet I waited for the proper channels to approve what I knew was approved in Heaven. I told Angela, "God chose you. There may be others more famous, but you are a lady unknown who is worthy of being known by the world." So I reported to Rev. Pak and David Eaton that we had the central part of the choir.

Building the Thousand-Voice Choir

It just naturally flowed that the process of building the choir would follow the Four Position Foundation and the Three Stages of Growth. During the whole process of assembling the choir, I felt guided by God and the Holy Spirit. Amen. It can be likened to the yarmulke worn in Judaism. I felt a spiritual yarmulke connected to the top of my head as True Parents’ spirit guided me past obstacles, pitfalls and loneliness. New Life Tabernacle was to learn "Amazing Grace," "Kumbaya" and later the "Hallelujah Chorus," which Rev. Pak chose. Sandra Lowen, my production assistant and consultant, came with me to start work on the arrangements of the few songs we had. Together with Mr. Donnell, we were feeling hopeful. I just had to check our "Kumbaya" arrangement for copyright purposes. At Mr. Donnell’s studio, Sandra Lowen and I laid the foundation for the song "Blessings." Sandra and I would call each other and discuss our lyrics as we sourced out the song. David Eaton, producer of the event, gave the budget and went to the studios to record the pilot songs. NLT had a version of "Amazing Grace" arranged by Mr. Charles Minor, and Miss Timmany Figueroa had a version of "Kumbaya." I told David that NLT’s version of "Amazing Grace" was better than mine: let’s just start the song with the traditional intro and then go into the contemporary downbeat. It was a done deal.

Our Church Pastors and Regional Leaders as God’s Instruments

Surely Heavenly Father holds dear in His heart the work of Pastors Pierre-Louis, Hori, Burson, and many others whose deeds God knows. In particular, I remember Rev. Juanita Pierre-Louis inviting me to the East Harlem Prison Ministry and Brother Phil McCracken inviting me to a university in Queens, where he personally witnessed to L.L. Cool J. I invited Ms. Lynette Carr, choir director of Westbury, Long Island, Community Church to join our choir, and she did.

God vindicated me in Harlem through Rev. Alan Inman’s invitation to a prayer breakfast at Sylvia’s Restaurant, where I could meet Dr. Washington and Pastor Derrick Porter-men who have led with heart and hand to make a difference in Harlem. I even got to play drums for Rev. Porter’s Sunday service at his church. Seeing these men give out True Parents’ Blessing of the Holy Wine to their congregations was deeply moving, indeed.

A growing body of bishops and pastors connected to us, and with the work of the Holy Spirit, leaders and members united together, the foundation for victory at MSG was imminent. General Kim said it would be a 2000-voice choir. "And let the Church say-Amen!"

Mobilization Coordinator Rev. Godwin D’Silva and I went to MSG to source out the area for the choir. At that time we were only thinking of 1000 people.

On to D.C.

Dr. Yang, assistant to Rev. Pak, inspired us to go to D.C. to teach the D.C. choirs the music and strengthen the choir foundation. Ms. Moses, Mr. Minor, Ms. Figueroa and I witnessed the Holy Spirit singing in our D.C. Church as never before. It was moving to hear these beautiful young voices sing the songs of God’s Kingdom.

My New Brother

On the production side of things, I interfaced regularly with David Eaton. Yet I was also responsible for mobilization through the choir, and Rev. Pak assigned Rev. Eric Holt as my new Abel. This was my first opportunity to work with Rev. Holt. I found him to be so supportive of me-assisting and fine-tuning the details-and he so helped me in making my offering that I discovered a new brother in True Parents.

June 13

Prior to the event, Rev. Pak had us report on a regular basis to him on the choir’s progress. Pastor Figueroa received hurtful persecution because of his affiliation with Rev. Moon, to the point that the venue for his ordination to become a bishop was revoked. Ms. Moses, too, weathered many storms of scorn and ignorance. I could feel Rev. Pak’s deep concern that everything would turn all right. I assured him that Ms. Moses and New Life Tabernacle’s leadership were committed to this event because of their love for God; and the persecution they faced from other religious institutions would not deter their faith or their commitment.

I sent Rev. David Reed to Ms. Moses’ home to personally escort her to the Garden that morning. My sons Justin and Alex helped out as ushers, along with Aliso Lowen. At the choir registration on Eighth Avenue, Mrs. Billie Sabo and Sandra Lowen helped register the choirs. The choir members began to stream in. With everything secured at registration, I went to the choir area and directed the groups to their respective seating.

It was ten minutes before "show-time." We had well over 1600 people in the choir, and people were still streaming in. Mindful of the need to be prompt, I was concerned that we start on time. Miraculously, Ms. Moses lifted her arms and "Amazing Grace, How Sweet the Sound" filled the Garden with God’s love and glory. Sandra Lowen and I were standing with the choir and bathing in the Love of God. Admittedly, hearing 2000 voices singing the song we had written together for the glory of God and True Parents was a Blessing in itself. Ms. Moses was fabulous, and the choir sang better than she had expected. As I looked toward Heaven, my greatest joy was sharing this victory in my heart with my beloved wife Fiona.

May this Godly victory spread forth forevermore.

Rev. Adruma Victoria, who was Blessed at Madison Square Garden on July 1, 1982, was a Performing Arts member of the original Go World Brass Band and performed at Yankee Stadium and Washington Monument. He was also a member of CARP’s Blue Tuna Band, under the guidance of Rev. Chung Goo "Tiger" Park. He rallied for 13 years in Germany and was present at the tearing down of the Berlin Wall. He and his family are National Messiahs to the nation of Kenya in West Africa. His wife and two daughters have preceded him to Nairobi since March of this year. He and his two sons plan to join them in the next few months.

UTS Graduation

by Gareth Davies-Barrytown, NY

Faced with a world in desperate need of healing, what can 34 UTS graduates do? Plenty, according to Reverend T.L. Barrett Jr., Senior Pastor of the Life Center Church of God in Christ, Chicago. Speaking at the 22nd commencement exercises on June 28th, he cited the Biblical story of the loaves and fishes, not for the miraculous work of Jesus, but for the boy who came forward with the two fishes and five barley loaves. "That was totally inadequate to feed the thousands of people who were gathered," he said, "but that young lad stepped forward saying, ‘I am here and I have something to offer.’ He insisted on being allowed to give what he had to Jesus." Reverend Barrett asked the graduates to compare what they had learned with what the world needs and to realize that they have two fishes and five loaves. But he also urged them to boldly step forward and offer what they have. "You should have the attitude that, ‘I am that lad and I am here and what I have counts.’ Be confident that what you have will be sufficient to make a difference."

Pastor Barrett told the graduates that they should have faith that God will work through Reverend Moon. "You must take what you have and give it to God through the spiritual leadership of Reverend Moon. Give what you have and go willingly where he sends you because he has a special relationship with God." Reverend Barrett spoke passionately about the life of sacrifice and obedience to God’s will which Reverend Moon has led. He urged the graduates to be as committed as an elderly member of his own church who, whenever faced with a request from the bishop always responds with, "Bishop, that’s just what I was fixin’ to do." Reverend Barrett’s spirited and moving address received a standing ovation which was appropriately followed by the choir’s powerful rendition of "Arise, your light has come," one of two pieces which they performed.

In the Founder’s Address, read by Reverend Peter Kim, Reverend Moon encouraged the graduates to be people of true love, particularly by developing true love within their families. "A true family is an indispensable school of true love for the creation of a true world, in which the true love of God has absolute dominion," he said. "Because of this harmony of love, they will also be able to enjoy true equality and freedom and true joy and happiness." In the absence of true love, he said, people have had recourse to all manner of external measures such as money, power and knowledge but these have failed to deliver fulfillment and happiness.

Reverend Moon therefore told the class of ’98 to never give up on true love. "I want you to understand that true love is still the best and only solution in this world. The problem is that no one in the past has tried it thoroughly. We must rediscover it and practice it courageously. That is the task especially of UTS graduates, who are messengers of this Unification gospel of true love. Please believe that this gospel will revolutionize the world, eventually solving all its problems completely, whether they are political, economic, industrial, cultural or environmental problems. You are going out to the field as UTS graduates to work for the realization of God’s kingdom. In your work, perhaps you will face a lot of practical challenges and difficulties. But please have absolute confidence in the power of true love. Already the Completed Testament Age has come. God’s power will be fully available where you are serious about true love. May God bless you all!"

President Shimmyo’s congratulatory remarks included an appreciation of individual students for their particular qualities. "Serge Brosseau, I admire your deep commitment of faith. Akiko Higashi, you are a small Japanese woman but I like your strong will. Raymond Otika, you endured much difficulty as a leader in Africa before coming to UTS but your warm kind of sensitivity is a real treasure. Young-joo Yoo, your big smile has the power to overcome any problem." Addressing the graduates in general, he told them, "All of you have each a unique character given from God. Please fully develop it and use it for the sake of God’s kingdom and his righteousness. And work hard to wipe away all the tears from the eyes of God and from the eyes of humanity and to build a peaceful world where pain and suffering shall be no more."

In his Graduate Response, Serge Brosseau, who graduated magna cum laude, looked forward to the challenge of "putting into practice in real life what we have learned here." His dream, he said, is to do as his hero, General Douglas MacArthur, did. "I want to come back to these special grounds after fulfilling my responsibility. I want to follow in those footsteps."

The graduates’ summer schedule includes one week at the Washington Times followed by a 40-day workshop at Chung Pyung Lake in Korea.

Master Of Divinity

Henry Kiryowa Kulubya
Christopher David McKeon cum laude
Herman Adza Mould
Naomichi Sawada cum laude
Clive Edward Wright cum laude
Tetsuya Yamada
Oksana V. Semenchova magna cum laude
Prince Edward Monya Tambi cum laude

Master Of Religious Education

Xavier Akerekoro-Zinho
Kotaro Araya
Serge Brosseau magna cum laude
Justine Nyiranshuti Cherutich
Leslie Paul Michael DeJonge
Seung-Yeon Doo cum laude
Masashi Fujikake
Taisuke Hibino
Akiko Higashi
Jun Honda
Katsuya Ito
Cirilo C. Jagopa-as
Tomomi Kaneuji
Soon-Ok Kang magna cum laude
Bryan Anthony Lancaster
Simone Allison Lancaster
Hiroyuki Matsumoto
Hiroyuki Miyake
Kinue Nakane cum laude
Akihiko Nishimura
Takaaki Ogino
Katsuya Oishi
Raymond Otika
Young-Joo Yoo
Remy Vollmer cum laude
Chiaki Yoshikawa

All of the graduation speeches and prayers were crystal clear this year thanks to the new sound system made possible by alumni/ae donations. The acoustics have also been improved by placing carpeting under the chairs (also paid for by donations.) Work has begun on the chapel roof so continued support will be deeply appreciated.

The First Pioneer

By Linna Rapkins

"We’re going to make some changes," announced Father one day in July of 1953.

Won Pil Kim, Mr. Aum, Mrs. Oak and Mrs. Kang and the few others present glanced at each other and then lowered their eyes respectfully. Changes? What could this mean?

His little Pusan group had now moved into a place somewhat larger than the stone-and-boxes hut built by Father and Won Pil Kim. People were coming all the time to hear Father’s lectures and to pray with him. It was a busy place. But it was still a small number of people who were really dedicated to working full-time with Father.

"That’s right, changes," said Father, in response to their questioning thoughts. "It’s so very important that we quickly reach more people. I know we’re not really ready to be separated, but we just can’t wait until we’re stronger and more able. It appears that the war in Korea is ending. They called a cease-fire. Nothing definite, but at least there’s hope. It should be a little easier to move around now."

He looked at Mrs. Kang and asked, "How would you like to be my first pioneer and work in the city of Taegu? It’s about halfway between here and Seoul and is almost as big as Pusan."

"I can do that," she answered.

Father looked serious. "It won’t be easy, of course. You’ll be alone, and you have received no real training to be a pioneer. We can’t give you much money-just the bus fare to get there and maybe a few won to tide you over. But it is very important to reach more people about God’s revelation." He studied her face. "Do you really think you can do it?"

"Yes, Son sengnim," she answered without hesitation. "I would be honored to have this mission." She thought of all those years she had witnessed to people in her old church before she met Father. It had been excellent training.

"Good," Father said quietly. Perhaps he was feeling a little sorry, knowing how difficult it would be for his first pioneer, especially since she was a woman and would be working alone. Perhaps, he was also thinking how much he would miss her.

He turned to the others. "The rest of us will continue for now in Pusan." Then his eyes focused on Won Pil Kim, "You know, Won Pil, we’re together now. We live together, work together, share our meals-but this cannot continue forever. In fact, these days of being together will end sooner than you think."

Won Pil Kim was too startled to speak. This was getting scary. They had been together so long and had been through so much together that any other way of life seemed impossible. They were a team-a unit-they were one. Won Pil Kim thought of Father standing outside the hut to welcome him each evening when he returned from work. This was his wonderful Father who took care of him; and this was his teacher who raised him up. How could he work apart from his Son sengnim? He thought about it, but no! He couldn’t imagine it!

Again, Father’s heart ached at the thought of separating from his dear disciple. But if they separated and went to several cities, they could meet more people. God’s work always came first.Mrs. Kang worked alone in Taegu for awhile. She witnessed to ministers a lot. She witnessed to other people. But she couldn’t convince anyone to believe her when she told them about Father and The Divine Principle. Finally, Father decided to help her. He left Pusan.

Once he arrived in Taegu, it didn’t take long for Father to make a big impression on the town, and once again he was in trouble. He just prayed and taught God’s message day in and day out and through the nights. This was his usual schedule. Then spirit world would send people to him.

Many of those who came were nice ladies, who became very inspired by Father’s talks. Whenever they came, they had many spiritual experiences and became so excited they didn’t want to end it and go home. They felt light and happy, and they just wanted to sing and pray and never stop. Many times, they stayed late into the night.

Soon, as you might expect, angry husbands were waiting by their doors when their wives tiptoed home late at night. It was just like the earlier days in Pyungyang when jealous husbands made so much trouble. Father felt worried for these ladies, but he couldn’t tell them to stay away. God needed them.

Things got worse and worse. Then, one day, one of the women came to Father’s place, and her face was bruised and swollen.

"What happened?" asked Father, afraid to hear the answer.

"My husband beat me because I came home so late last night," she answered.

"Oh, I’m so sorry!" Father said as tears came to his eyes. "Please be careful." He wanted to tell her to stay home, but he couldn’t.

A few days later, another woman came with blood running out of her mouth. "It’s alright, Son sengnim. Don’t worry about me," she cried, holding a towel to her mouth. "My husband doesn’t understand why it is so important for me to come here."

Father just wept for her. He felt so sorry that these women had to suffer this way.

The next day, another woman arrived and her hair had been shaved completely off. She was bald! No Korean woman would ever let herself be seen with a bald head.

"My husband thought that if he shaved off my hair I would be too embarrassed to leave home," she explained, not knowing whether to laugh or cry. "But I would feel dead if I stayed away. Please don’t make me go home." And he didn’t.

The next day one of the women came with no dress on. She had thrown a blanket over her shoulders and had run like that to Father’s place.

"My husband hid all my clothes so I would have to stay home," she explained. "But I’m here anyway!" There was a triumphant and determined tone in her voice.

Soon, the word was going around town that the women were running naked to Teacher Moon and staying all night with him. It was a huge scandal. Father couldn’t witness to new people anymore or continue teaching, because the whole town seemed to believe he was an evil man.

Finally, in September 1953 Father told his followers, "Perhaps the rumors will die down if I leave Taegu for awhile. Please work together, all of you. Mrs. Kang will be in charge." He looked at her lovingly. "I will be depending on my hardworking missionary-my first pioneer-to bring results to this city."

Committee Session Two: The Family and the State

by William D. Lay

Committee Two took up the discussion of the Family and the State.

Committee chairman Dr. Aziz Sidky, former prime minister of Egypt, observed in introducing the session that the speakers at the morning plenary sessions had touched extensively on many aspects of the relationship of the family and the state, including laws regulating marriage, divorce and other domestic relations; taxation; regulation of media and communication; and other areas of the state/family interface.

The family is the creation of God, Dr. Sidky noted, and while customs and conditions may vary from one country to another, the family is the family everywhere. The family is the basic cell of human society, and human social health is dependent on the health of families.

In essence, he said, our task is to bring the family back to what God originally wanted it to be.

In that vein, the first speaker, Mr. Claude Durand-Berger of France, quoted Holderlin and Peter Pan in speaking of the "childhood of humanity." "The vessel of childhood never comes back again." But individually and collectively, we have the ability to remember, and this "powerful lever . . . has raised up a new faith in Republican virtues and arouses a new trend toward Democratic values." That is, as we recall the innocence of the childhood of humanity, we are motivated to seek to create structures and governments which are faithful to our collective memory of an unstained world.

Mr. Durand-Berger then quoted Rousseau’s moving definition of conscience from La Profession de Foi du Vicaire Savoyard. One who disdains to follow the inner voice of conscience will "wander from one mistake to another, because of a non-regulated understanding and an unprincipled understanding."

Conscience, in turn, can only take proper root in a good childhood, Mr. Durand-Berger observed. "Family is the cradle of conscience, and conscience is the guardian of family." Supported by conscience, the family teaches the benefits of virtue and imparts an enthusiasm for virtue. Just as the voice of conscience is not "a cold, severe voice," so the family, is "not only a place for duty, not a mere cohabitation of related people, but a prospective outlet towards self accomplishment and an exaltation of virtue." The family then becomes the source of the "highest forms of sacrifice and public virtue, of real dedication to the service of the state, and of patriotism."

Mr. Durand-Berger then noted that the Americas might be viewed as a "factory of universality" and a pivot of prosperity and increasing exchanges among Europe, Africa, Asia, the emerging countries and the Pacific region. He further urged that the way toward worldwide unity based on good families is "shorter than the most pessimistic and unwilling ones might have thought."

Continuing with the theme of universalism, Amb. Jose Maria Chaves pointed out that as we approach the millennium, we find ourselves in a world dominated by a "universal state" – the United States. This empire is ruled by "the framework of principles of representative democracy, the free market and human rights." However, is the American Empire different from previous empires? Are the problems of the world to be solved under the leadership of the USA? "One thing we do know is that in spite of the progress achieved to date, world problems loom in greater magnitude than ever before… In this new world of the 21st Century, the family as the fundamental institution of society will necessarily reflect the new challenges."

Amb. Chaves mentioned the "almost incredible advancement in science and technology," and observed that "we seem to be entering a world where mutual consent rather than force will be the rule." Yet, "facing the overwhelming problems that confront mankind, I find that the only recourse is to recover the essence of religions and apply spiritual principles to the social situations that beg for an answer."

Amb. Chaves recommended an expansion of the family, rather than a "retreat to a limited experience of the traditional nuclear family." Africa, with its expansive view of the extended family, offers "a broad, comprehensive, inclusive concept that without question provides an incomparably solid basis for family as the fundamental unit of society and as the elementary component of a community."

Though today’s families face serious challenges for survival, "at the same time, families are acknowledged to harbor inherent strengths and resources which can be tapped to promote peace, reconciliation and integrated human development."

"Many social ills are blamed on the collapse of families," Amb. Chaves observed, "but it is the social upheaval itself that makes family life impossible." Millions of children throughout the world have no opportunity to experience childhood, since they are employed in substandard jobs lacking sanitation and safety, and may be mercilessly exploited. In the face of these human rights violations, the state and international organizations must undertake steps to improve and protect the status of family groups and the individual members.

In addition, it is incumbent to press ahead with the project, envisioned by Kant and others, of establishing a society of nations free from domination by any power and resting on a foundation of justice, peace being the fruit of justice.

Former Prime Minister Maxime Carlot Korman of Vanuatu observed that although individuals are commonly thought of as the basic political unit, "it is not the character and behavior of individuals that determine a state’s identity, but rather its families and its communities." In fact, it is within families that the identity of the individual is created. Families, in turn, determine the character of the higher levels of social organization.

Leaders must become more family focused, Mr. Korman noted, as the family will necessarily be the pivotal unit of social change. "While some political change can occur through collective individual action apart from the realm of the family, more fundamental change in social, cultural and religious values is best carried out within the unit of the family."

Mr. Korman also predicted that while the world is likely to become increasingly cooperative and interdependent, we are also likely to see an increasing de-centralization within the state, as families take on greater political importance. "The political revolution of the 21st century is likely to be one that reduces the influence of the traditional vehicles of influence of modern politics in nation-states and upgrades the often belittled importance of the family unit in determining political outcome."

The final presentation of the session was made by former Prime Minister Lloyd Erskine Sandiford of Barbados. In setting the stage for his remarks, Mr. Sandiford harkened to the lyrics of a love song that asks, "What am I living for if not for you? Nobody else will do." The family begins with love and commitment.

Mr. Sandiford further looked to the biblical story of the Garden of Eden and the fall of humankind, as well as redemption, to provide understanding of the present human condition. In this manner, he noted, we can see what is wrong and what can be done to set it right. Like Milton, we can contemplate paradise lost and paradise regained.

Mr. Sandiford noted that people naturally seek to maximize benefit, but benefit must be viewed in a broad and profound sense. The United Nations Report of the Development of Nations in 1997, for example, uses a "human development index" to measure the progress of nations, rather than merely per capita income. In considering the state of the family worldwide, some clearly have much more than others, and those without seek to obtain more.

The Barbados constitution, Mr. Sandiford noted, makes reference to "the position of the family in a society of free men and institutions." People seek happiness, and the family shapes their affective and emotional selves in a way that determines, to a large extent, whether they will be able to experience happiness and peace. Persons emerging from a deprived family are likely to add to the sum total of human misery rather than alleviate it.

Mr. Sandiford pointed out that Rev. Moon, in convening this conference, is sending out an urgent message regarding the importance of the family, and has demonstrated a global view of the problems of the world and their solution.

The Family, Human Rights and Global Peace: Complementary Objectives or on a Collision Course?

by Dr. Nicholas N. Kittrie-NYC

Ask men and women anywhere, old and young, in the streets, at the work places, and at their homes. And by an overwhelming chorus, they will agree: "Families are good," "Human rights are good," and "Global peace is good." Yes, the world responds almost unanimously, all three institutions are good.

Our international convocation brings together representatives from nearly half the world’s countries to celebrate and reaffirm the fundamental role of the family in human society and culture. We are gathered here also in a year which celebrates the 50th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, advanced in 1948 by a U.N. Committee chaired by Mrs. Eleanor Roosevelt. Finally, we are assembled at a time in which global peace is far from being attained, where ethnic violence continues in Europe and Africa, and weapons of mass warfare are being tested out on the Indian subcontinent. It is in light of these conflicting realities that we must face an increasingly complex question: are the invigoration of the family, the promotion of human rights and the attainment of global peace complementary tasks? And if not, how can we strike the most creative and productive balance between the three?

The family institution is undergoing at present a dramatic transition and indeed finds itself in a state of siege throughout the world. Divorce rates have dramatically increased everywhere, reaching a United States height of some 130 divorces per 1,000 married persons in 1990, compared with a mere 35 divorces in 1965. The rate of Washington DC’s out-of-wedlock teenage births in proportion to all teenage births grew from 13.5% in 1940 to 75.9% in 1994. [Washington Post, Jan. 28, 1997, A13] Overall, in this capital of the free world, some 67.8% of all infants were born to unwed mothers. And the percentage of children growing up in families made up of two adults, of distinct gender, with a parent present at home, has declined to less than 31%. [Vigi Wagner (ed.), The Family in America: Opposing Viewpoints (San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 1992), pp. 17-24]

These are the current realities, despite the fact that both ancient and contemporary writings and scholars agree that the family is "the natural and fundamental group unit in society," [ICPR, 2391] and as early a scripture as the Book of Genesis, immediately following its account of Eve’s creation from Adam’s rib, unequivocally advocates the institution of marital union. "Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife, and they shall be one flesh." [Gen. 2:24]

Some two millennia later, in 1948, the U.N.’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights similarly reaffirmed that "men and women...have the right to marry and to found a family" and that the "family...is entitled to protection by society and the state." [UDHR, 16(1)&(3)] The subsequent and much heralded U.N. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966), as well as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966), reiterate the same high principles regarding marriage and the family.

It is surprising, therefore, that despite these Biblical and modern international guarantees for both marriage and the family, the Constitution of the United States and its various amendments make not a single direct reference to these "natural" and "fundamental" institutions. Only in dispersed judicial decisions and in the opinions of the United States Supreme Court does one find the assertion that marriage represents "a right of privacy older than the Bill of Rights" and that the marital bedrooms are "sacred precincts" [Justice William O. Douglas writing for the majority in Griswold v. Connecticut 381 U.S. 479, at 485-86].

The complaint is often heard, indeed, that existing United States laws accord few benefits and advantages to the family unit, with the Internal Revenue Code often even penalizing couples filing joint family tax returns. An America lacking in the development of domestic support for the family institution, could not be expected therefore to place much emphasis upon family values in its foreign policy. The vigorous exporting of Planned Parenthood has been one (frequently criticized) exception.

The history, as well as modern foundations, of the human rights movement (whether economic, social and cultural, or civil and political) display a dramatically different pattern. In antiquity both legal and moral emphasis was placed on human duties rather than human rights. Examining the Biblical ten commandments as typical of the ancient approach, one readily discerns that duties and obligation to divinity, to the community, to the family and to one’s parents predominated over attention to individual entitlements.

It was primarily the American Declaration of Independence (in 1776), accompanied by the Constitution and the Bill of Rights (in 1787 and 1791) and followed shortly thereafter by the French Revolution (in 1789) and France’s Declaration of the Rights of Man, which turned that country’s former "subjects" into "citizens" and transformed the ancien regime’s emphasis upon duties into a celebration of rights. The French revolutionaries perceived modern society not as an autocratic entity but as a commonwealth growing out of a "social contract" between those governing and those being governed. This contract implied a mutuality of individual and state rights as well as duties. The U.S. Declaration of Independence’s earlier articulation of man’s inalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness was an even more revolutionary step. The Declaration borrowed from the earlier philosophical and religious foundations of natural law to endow a new and secular society with the justification for overthrowing an abusive and alien established government. The Declaration endowed popular revolutions with jurisprudential legitimacy.

While growing healthily in its few selected liberal countries of origin, mostly in Western Europe and North America, the young human rights movement did not gain much international recognition until after World War I. Only with the dismantling of the decaying Czarist Russian, Ottoman and Austro-Hungarian empires did the League of Nations insist upon the introduction of a new body of international human rights to protect minority communities in newly created sovereign nations-such as Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Poland and Romania.

But this creation of communal human rights in the post-World War I era was not accompanied by effective enforcement mechanisms. Ethnic and regional tensions, inflamed by the expansionist policies of Nazism and Fascism, brought about a second world conflagration. Only the loss of many scores of millions of human lives in Europe and Asia (atheist, Christian, Confucian, Jewish and Shinto) gave rise to the new and modern wave of human rights advocacy and activism. It is significant-in light of both former and present communal holocausts-that the current body of human rights places its primary and heaviest emphasis upon safeguarding individuals rather than distinct communities. It is this brand of human rights, fiercely emphasizing individualism and individual autonomy that the United States has increasingly witnessed domestically and has exported diligently abroad. Much less determination and success have been evidenced with regard to protecting massive communal rights abuses in places like Cambodia, Indonesia, Rwanda and the former Yugoslavia.

This is where the world community stands at the present time with regard to both family and human rights issues. The family institution is being shaken by economic mobility and social alienation. The family, once an efficiently integrated economic unit and a primary socialization and social services deliverer, has become devastated by raging no-fault divorce, the one-parent home, the two employed-parents household, and a growing number of latch-key children. The values dispersed by the increasingly global mass media further reinforce these existing realities.

In the more traditional communities throughout the world, religious fundamentalism and archaic social practices continue to hold on to, or even to reintroduce, the old ways of family life. These include total control by male heads of the household, arranged marriages between underage children, discrimination against girl infants, involuntary circumcision of pre-adolescent females, and the social ostracism of divorcees and widows.

While the contemporary family continues to be buffeted between the extremes of unstable modernity and archaic traditionalism, we have all been witnessing the expending of much more energy and militancy in the pursuit of human rights than in the reformation and rejuvenation of the family, an institution not long ago proclaimed as "the natural and fundamental unit in society." The current and militant emphasis on individual rights (of children, women, the disabled, the poor, the uneducated), the growing claims for increased gender entitlements, and vigorous demands for the recognition of unconventional lifestyles, have exposed what has remained of the so-called "traditional family" to ever-greater pressures. No wonder, therefore, that the Western-driven human rights movement, which would restrict marriage to "men and women of full age," which condemns arranged familial matrimony, and would grant both partners "equal rights," is met with less than full enthusiasm in some parts of the world. Yet, at the same time, the international human rights instruments’ continuing emphasis on the marriage of "men" and "women" fails to meet the more militant demands of the advocates of alternative lifestyles.

As we face these escalating "family" and "human rights" confrontations throughout the world, we cannot avoid asking whether growing human rights and family stability are compatible with each other. We are compelled, furthermore, to consider the impact of the changes in both of these social institutions upon the broader communal well-being and global peace.

It has been repeatedly asserted that the family has historically served as the foundation of civilization [Carle Zimmerman, Family and Civilization, 1947]. It was supposedly within the familial setting that one was to learn also to curb the excesses of one’s ego and to settle conflicts through non-violent means. Human rights, likewise, have been viewed as critical tools for attaining greater individual as well as communal justice. And without justice, many of us have believed, peace cannot prosper.

Let me, therefore, put two ultimate questions before us: has the decline in the socializing role of the family served to increase the violence amongst us? and has the growing emphasis on human rights acted to further reduce our commitments to communal cooperation and thereby adversely affect communal peace? It is the objective of this convocation to address these questions from historical as well as modern perspectives, from distinct cultural views and from multicultural approaches.

This chair will not presume to foretell the outcome of this convocation’s efforts. But it must be abundantly clear to all of us that neither the family institution nor the human rights movement can flourish by emphasizing rights while ignoring responsibilities. No social institution can hope for a just and continuous existence which does not couple entitlements with duties.

Dr. Kittrie is Chairman, The Eleanor Roosevelt Institute for Justice & Peace and Chairman, WCSF ’98.

Session IV: The Family and a Culture of Peace

by Karen Judd Smith

Dr. Hamad started by noting that while families vary greatly, depending upon the culture, families are nevertheless important for the building of society. Even at the international level, the recognition of this is reflected in the United Nations’ day of commemoration celebrating families on the International Day of Families each May 15.

Dr. Anie S. Kalayjan presented many statistics showing how we have made dramatic advancement in health care over the past 50 years. This is indicated by the increase in life expectancy, eradication of diseases which took thousands of lives each year, decreased infant mortality, increased literacy, higher real income, more safe water, improved technologies, absence of global conflict and improved environmental policies.

Nevertheless, many challenges remain and even increase. Today, more than a billion people live in poverty, and the number is increasing, especially in Africa, South America and the Middle East. Each year millions die of hunger and malnutrition; 200 million people work in slavery (50% children). There’s an increase in cases of genocide and politically-motivated mass murders; two million women and girls (that’s five every minute) have experienced FGM (female genital mutilation). One fifth to one half of all women admit to having been beaten by their parents and, in the USA alone, one woman is raped every 45 seconds.

She then related this to how these facts affect families. There is an increase in the families headed by women, more and more women are working outside the home, the role of the extended family is decreasing and therefore the stress on the nuclear family is increasing, and the population is aging (the elderly usually live in poverty). Where domestic violence is common and the number of families being displaced by war is increasing, an increased number of children are clearly being denied the love and protection they deserve. The family in many cases is in shambles.

This point was later elucidated when one participant briefly (very understatedly) outlined the reality of her experience in Rwanda. She noted that one million people died during the recent war. "The impact of this conflict on the family cannot really be comprehended. After the war, everything was destroyed-homes, families, lives. For example, 30 members of my family died."

She told of one scene where women were making bricks to rebuild houses. A person remarked, "Why don’t you ask the men to help?" But only one old man and one little boy was left from that whole community.

Now, children became heads of families. Children live alone with children. Brothers and sisters are left to survive alone; brothers impregnate sisters.

"During that time, even family members killed one another. Husbands killed wives. Families are shattered. Now there are so many widows; most are abused. The family is in such disrepair. What can we do to reshape the family? Does anyone have some idea? What can we do to rebuild?"

So while there is much improvement in certain areas, there are still major problems and breakdown in others. With this breakdown, the challenge of the nuclear family is increasing and growing. But how to cope?

Dr. Kalayjan noted that we so often "medicate" our difficulties with drink, drugs and TV.

With so many marriages ending in divorce, we become so desensitized to the very human and destructive consequences till the point that today, in some cases, we almost make divorce festive.

Another response to the overwhelming nature of today’s problems is that parents become paranoid or possessed, trying to forget our pain and problems through addiction to TV or internet or computers-or obsessed with our history (dumping our problems on our children)-or we take the attitude that we are a victim, looking for special attention-or we take anti-depressants. The number of "depressed people" has doubled in the developed countries, lately. Or we overreact to the simple things: we go to a therapist because "they moved my ball."

In short, we often feel inadequate and helpless in the face of the reality of today’ s problems. We as families feel helpless when we look at the world atrocities.

Dr. Kalayjan then asked: what is the real role of the family? She concluded simply: much of what would make a world of difference is summed up in the short title: "All I really need to know I learned in kindergarten."

"Imagine if countries abided by this? If countries could only abide by these things. But the dichotomy arises because we learn in the family something opposite to what we see out there. We often do not prepare our children to deal with the world."

She recommended that the larger social responsibility of the global family should be to support the nuclear family in all of its work. To this end, it is our responsibility to connect our resources, to put our energies together to help the larger family, to fill the spiritual need.

She concluded with the message: in all your deliberations, in all your actions, you must be mindful of how your actions will affect the next seven generations.

Dr. Bahija Al-Hishi presented an overview of family from the perspectives of human rights. She showed how children’s rights are intimately entwined with human rights and family rights. We must realize that, while this is a very complicated issue, the rights of children nevertheless need to be given priority. Children are dependent, the essence of the future, and represent themselves socially; the bottom line is that children need the guarantee to be loved to become healthy-body, mind and soul. As rights, children’s rights are an essential aspect of human rights.

The unfortunate reality is that children’s rights are at the bottom of people’s priority lists. They do not represent a social force and are dependent.

But from this perspective, a very important legally-binding document was issued by the UN in 1989. Now each member nation of the UN is legally responsible. This was the first time laws were framed and made mandatory for participating states: to guarantee healthy children’s needs.

But the reality of the relationship between family rights and children’s rights is that there needs to be a way to protect children whose family is the source of abuse. Parents’ rights over their children are not absolute.

Building on this declaration, we need to set minimum standards for the protection of children and establish strategies to place children’s rights at the top of the list, devising ways to make certain that countries honor these determinations.

Clearly we have to consider peace when we consider children. Talking about peace ultimately leads to discussions of the family. Peace is a necessary condition for families to be able to protect and provide opportunities for their children.

Obviously, wars deprive children of the hope of living in opportunity. And naturally their health is challenged. A secure and peaceful world is the only world which can guarantee such rights for children. Therefore, we have to work for global peace. Let’s call on all leaders to sign treaties. Prosperity can only grow in times of peace. Children will not be deprived in peaceful societies.

The role of the media is great at this time. Media should have children in mind when they plan their programs, rather than economics. Concerns for children are usually neglected when they are simply seen as a "niche market."

Dr. Jin Sung Park-Moon

In my field of international finance, the end of this millennium will be dramatic. Now with the Asian currency crisis, we’re in a time when Bill Gates could buy Korea!

Currently the IMF has stepped into the Asian crisis. It seems to have been fairly successful, but the Japanese yen is sliding now. Why is this important from a world peace perspective? For example, unless China grows at 8% per year, there will be dramatic increased unemployment, and this will lead to social instability.

The USA is unique as a unified country-one language, currency and government. When you tie money together, you tie countries together. Unfortunately in Europe, while it will have one currency, without one government, tensions will most likely develop, as will the tendency to point fingers and lay blame.

So while the US may be OK itself, if Asia, Russia and Europe stumble, who will buy our American goods?

But here we are speaking about family.

We need to drive at world peace, not through the global level, since most of us do not have that kind of access. We need to find a way to make it very personal. This we can do through the family.

If we take world peace very personally, the way we can work on world peace is through our own families, not through others’.

While we have physical abuse, substance abuse, sexual abuse and disrespect for one another in our own families, there can be no peace. Peace in the family is our own work as a son, daughter, sister, brother, mother or father. Even elected officials are all of these!

Dr. Park Moon wanted to share a couple of simple, pragmatic points about strengthening family, and he focused on the husband-wife relationship as the primary relationship providing the basis for peace in the family, the basis upon which children can develop in a healthy and loving environment.

His wife has simplified it to three words: conceive, believe, achieve.

First, if we are to work on and make strong families, we need a concept of the ideal family. To do this, he noted that we have to go back to a fundamental question of God’s existence, for it is from such fundamental perspectives, explicitly or implicitly, that everything else in our thinking and actions flow. That is, our lives are driven implicitly by our answer to this question of the reality of God and spiritual life.

Dr. Park Moon’s perspective was shaped profoundly by growing up influenced by Rev. Moon, who sees that God created humanity to be His love partners, not just toys or pets. As such, God divided out His masculinity and femininity into man and woman-equal but different-for the sake of love. Naturally, a man and woman reflect God more fully through their union, through their holy marriage.

So he views life as a journey toward a union which fully reflects God.

He described part of his "concept" to include the key aspects of commitment and fidelity. "I was conceptually married even when I was 12, 15. Even at that age I found myself married to a concept of marriage...knowing the person was out there somewhere."

Because of this concept, and by active belief in this concept, his belief in marriage started many years before actually getting married.

Today, the reality is that all kids are concerned about at school, on TV, in their discussions, is sex. Our responsibility as parents is to present healthy concepts; their choice is whether or not to extend their effort and believe. That is our personal responsibility.

We start to put the conceptions into practice by actualizing the concept.

From one perspective, the unending practice of having girlfriends and boyfriends is essentially practicing for marriage and divorce.

Bottom line, however, it is every natural for children to want to be with both mommy and daddy. Divorce is not a viable option for a young child.

Dr. Park Moon told how he dealt with getting through school and university when surrounded by the peer pressure to date. He approached it as having two options: Option A, to keep himself pure and wait for the special person out there, as if already married to her. Option B, to date and have girlfriends, relationships and apparent fun. He simply thought as follows: "If I stick to option A, I will have plenty of time to opt out for option B. But if I choose option B at a young age, option A is out. From a practical point of view, option A first is the logical choice; it covers both bases."

Continuing with a very frank and honest sharing of the beginning of his arranged marriage with the second daughter of Rev. Moon, he noted that while he was excited and delighted, his wife clearly had the opposite feeling. However, she was committed and serious.

Rev. Moon gave them one piece of advice. "In a good marriage, fighting is normal. It’s far better than not talking to one another. BUT there is one golden rule. Never end the day fighting. Never go to sleep until you have resolved the argument."

He admitted that when men get into an argument, they get sleepy. So with this baseline of commitment to no sleep while angry with his spouse and no divorce, the result is a loving and prized possession: a family with five children.

He concluded that by creating a happy family and living in the best way that each of us can, we are contributing substantially to a peaceful world.

"If each person, each family did this, our world would be in a much better place."

The Elevator of Life

How’s this for an illustration for life? We all live in a huge building. There’s floors above the ground - Heaven Floor 1, Heaven Floor 2, etc. on up although the highest floors and the penthouse are still under construction.

Below ground, there are many lower levels: Hell Floor I, descending to Hell Floor 2, etc. No one knows how low they go - Hell Floor 66? 666?

Anyway, we can all move around on our floors but whenever we want to move from floor to floor, we have to use The Elevator. There’s Elevators on every floor, with the same buttons. Here’s what the buttons mean:

God: Always an express ride up. But button is hard to find.

Family: Goes up floor by floor. Can be claustrophobic or act like it’s broken, but almost always gets you to a higher floor.

Money: Always out of order.

Drugs and alcohol: Only goes down, although it goes down so slowly, floor by floor, that it may take awhile to hit bottom.

Suicide: Always just one step into an empty elevator shaft.

Extramarital affairs: Trick elevator - it looks like it’s going to take you to a more interesting floor, but when you get on, the doors slam shut and it’s an express to the basement. Gives you electrical shocks all the way down.

Food and material goods: Always the freight elevator. Never goes above the ground level.

Education: May open the door, but doesn’t necessarily take you anywhere.

Friends: Some friends bring you up. Some friends bring you down. Choose whom you ride with carefully.

May we always hit the right buttons!

Cheryl W.