Persecution in the Dartmouth Review

From: GZJohnston
Subj: Letters published by the Dartmouth Review
To: UNews

Dear Richard,

Please find attached three letters that I have sent to the Dartmouth Review campus newspaper at Dartmouth College.

In a conversation with Tyler Hendricks earlier today he said that he would like to see these letters. Tyler also thought you might be interested in them, that maybe they would be something you could use for the UNews.

Therefore, if you would be so kind as to download them to give to Tyler we would both be most grateful. Also, if you think they would be something you would like to publish, please feel free to do so.

By way of background, the Dartmouth Review is conservative college newspaper that has been challenging Dartmouth on some of the craziness that has infected that, as well as most other, college/university campuses. One of the founders of the Review worked for the old New York City Tribune and then went on to work for the Washington Times. The Review has a lot in common with us in that they are deeply concerned about the rise of immorality and the abandonment of Western cultural (Christian) values that has taken place on campus.

They published my first letter last November and subsequently published the two other letters I have sent to them. Now they are helping me to secure a speaking venue at the college in the near future. They will even help me to advertise my talk.

See for yourself what I wrote.

Thank you very much. All the very best.

ITPN,

Gunnard Johnston
Rev. Gunnard Z. Johnston
35 Andrew Street #30
Manchester, New Hampshire 03104-2417
Tel./Fax. 603.624.9474


The Dartmouth Review
P.O. Box 343
Hanover, New Hampshire 03755

October 21, 1995

Dear Review:

Congratulations on your stand against homosexuality and the "National Coming Out Week." With the demise of Communism the "gay rights" issue is the latest craze on the campus scene. Like communism's failure, this aberration, too, is destined to pass. One wonders, however, how many lives will be tragically lost in this debacle, as they were under the communist nightmare. I also wonder where the local clergy stand on this issue.

Let me offer a few insights because many people appear to be confused, not the least of which are the College administration and faculty: of course homosexuality has been a universal taboo since the beginning of human history. It does not require a doctorate in biology to conclude that if homosexuality were truly natural then the end of the human race would be a guaranteed certainty. The very fact that the recent events at Dartmouth included a call to "End Heterosexism" indicates that every belief system seeks to assert itself in the face of differing belief systems.

In this case, the homosexuality believers, like their communist forebears of a hundred years ago, begin their argument against the opposition heterosexual world by demanding "equal time, equal space." This is always the first step. By asserting equal value in a democratic society, even non-believers are inclined to give them wide latitude, all in the name of "tolerance" for differing ideas. But what happens when these differing ideas not only demand their own place within the panoply of ideologies but eventually demand subjective dominance over the entire culture? Again, we need only to review the rise of communism to see how it gradually wore down the opposition to the point where it almost took over, due mainly to the steady weakening of the morals of the institutions charged with protecting culture's values.

Today, as before, we are left with only our own innate powers of discernment to distinguish what is natural and good, and what is unnatural and bad. Fortunately, those powers are great, especially if we feed them with a vigorously active and steadfast pursuit of the true and natural way. Recent arguments of the homosexual lobby have used alleged observations of homosexual behavior in the animal world. As every mother tells her children, however, just because somebody else jumps off a bridge does not mean we must do the same. Another contention often used today is the "phantom gene" argument which states that some people apparently are born with some difference in their gene structure which predisposes them toward homosexuality. Again, no such empirical proof has ever been proffered by a reputable scientific source. Even if such an anomaly was found, it would remain just that, an anomaly, a departure from the natural norm. Like cell mutations in living organisms, such events are always short-lived and they always conclude when the organism in question dies. It is never repeatable from one generation to the next.

The real reason for this rise in homosexuality is that it involves a question which has never been fully answered. That is the issue of sex and love. If we as a society continue to tolerate free-wheeling and uncommitted sexual practices on the heterosexual level, then those who wish to take it to the next extreme -- into unrestrained sexual license, be it with man, woman, child, or beast -- will always have a basis for their demands. Physical diseases like AIDS and societal diseases like shattered families are the clear warning signs that we had better straighten out our sexual mores in a hurry. To continue the reckless abandonment of personal responsibility in one's sexual life is the sure ticket to certain death.

Sincerely,

Rev. Gunnard Z. Johnston, Jr. `69
Unification Campus Ministry Association

(The following is a separate letter sent at a later date. It has been attached to this letter to make one single file.


Reverend Gunnard Z. Johnston, Jr.
35 Andrew Street #30
Manchester, New Hampshire 03104-2417
(603)624-9474

The Dartmouth Review
P.O. Box 343
Hanover, New Hampshire 03755

November 25, 1995

Dear Review:

In your latest editorial by Mr. Brewer, "Ivory Tower or Football Factory?", you address several incidents of violence, both physical and verbal, not only at Dartmouth but at the other Ivies as well. These sad tragedies at America's most elite institutions of higher education simply reflect the general direction of our nation. Obviously, we have a burning hole in the moral fabric that once bound together the institutions that are charged to carry on the values and traditions that guide our nation. The College community's escalating conflicts in virtually every area of human relationship are a screaming clarion for a sensible clear-minded solution. Whether it is between man and woman, black and white, this ethnicity and that, this religion and another, liberal and conservative, the community of Dartmouth -- like the rest of America -- is desperately in need of a common denominator that can restore a unifying power to our rapidly unraveling society.

When the most promising students in the land are resorting to suicide, murder, theft, defacing another's property, and defaming another's character you know there has been a monumental meltdown of the core values that had previously served to bind us together as a College community and nation. Never before in either Dartmouth's or the nation's histories has there ever been such a struggle over what we as a people hold to be true. Surely, what we see today in Hanover, Cambridge, New Haven, Ithaca, et.al., as well as in Gary, Indiana, South-Central L.A., and Main Street, U.S.A., would appall even the most hard-bitten of our forebears. Our nation is mortally sick and we need a prescription.

We can blame each other all we want. We can ascribe our failures to our genetic make-up, we can say that all is a huge failure, that life is bad joke in the larger scheme of eternal chaos.

The facts, however, indicate something else. We, men and women, infants and adolescents, of every race, religion and ethnic origin, were created by a creative and parental God for a divine purpose: we were created to build a greater human family of peace and eternal love based on a principle that is equal and fair to all. Judaism and Christianity clearly point to that, and that is what the Pilgrim and Puritan founders of this nation came here to fulfill. They knew what we seem to have forgotten: humankind was created good by good God, but we human beings became corrupted by sin. Even Milton's Paradise Lost, in paraphrasing the Bible, recognizes this truth. If we, as a College community or larger nation, continue to scoff at or ignore this, we will continue to decline until all is perished.

So before we totally destroy each other over political, racial, ethnic, or religious differences, we would do better to realize that every problem starts within each one of us. We all have a fallen sinful nature. We are all clouded in one way or another to the needs of those around us. We all lean more toward serving ourselves rather than our brother, our sister, our parents, our children, our neighbors. That is the problem: when the first human ancestors fell away from seeing and living from God's perspective, they settled on their own self-centered perspective. In turn, each one of us is the product of that fallen improper perspective because we are all part of the fallen human race lineage. That is the origin of the problems we see within ourselves or in others, at home or around the world. To deny or disparage this reality is foolhardy and ultimately self- destructive. Whoever said "ignorance is bliss" certainly did not know what they were talking about.

We see this most clearly in the misuse and abuse of love between two people. When men see women as only sex objects and women see men only as servants, there is no chance for true unity. And without unity, there is no chance for lasting peace. When men use women, and women use men, for their self-centered desires the one who is used is always demeaned. God never intended that. Sex is the most intensely pleasurable experience because God intended it to bind two people together in love forever, not merely for a moment of temporary ecstasy.

The result of that love naturally produces new life, a new child! How wondrous and beautiful an expression of God's encouragement of that love when a new-born infant is born! There is literally nothing else like this in the entire spectrum of life. This experience is what elevates humans to feel toward the child -- and, by extension, to others -- as God feels toward us. We become closer to God, almost as equals! Of course, God is still the original creator, but even God needs companionship. That is why, as the parental God, He created us. He created us so we, as His children, could relate with Him on every level.

When sexual love becomes a cheapened self-serving "blast", it is now the enemy of God and all of us. Self-centered love destroys the human relationship when it was supposed to strengthen it. What started out as the most powerful cement to bind two people together now becomes the most repellent divider. This is why lasting true love has endured as the most cherished of all things throughout history. We need to revive that value now.

Sincerely,

Reverend Gunnard Z. Johnston, Jr.

(Note: There is one more letter in this series to follow.)

(See below)


Reverend Gunnard Z. Johnston, Jr. `69
35 Andrew Street
Manchester, NH 03104-2417
(603) 624-9474

Mr. E. Davis Brewer `95
The Dartmouth Review
P.O. Box 343
Hanover, NH 03755-0343

January 20, 1996

Dear Mr. Brewer and Review Staff:

In response to your request for a contribution sent out late last year, please find enclosed my gift to the Review for this year.

I want to congratulate you once again for your courageous stand against the weak-minded and destructive trends that have engulfed one of the most beautiful colleges ever created by the tears, sweat, and blood of human endeavor, Dartmouth. In this day and age it is all too

easy to ignore the tremendous sacrifices that went into making America and Dartmouth. By your efforts and with your voice you give hope to not only the Dartmouth community, but to thousands -- if not millions -- of students around the world.

Therefore, I say to you: keep it up, keep fighting for what you believe. Never allow yourselves to be seduced by the false images and broken promises of those who would turn Dartmouth and America into a modern day Sodom and Gomorrah. The free sex champions of the `60s and 70's are now sitting in far too many professorships and administrative positions. With steady and uncompromising determination, however, this can be changed.

What Dartmouth and all the leading institutions of America need today -- now more than ever -- is true decency. Without a sincere effort to find and follow true decency, real moral courage, and a way of life that God can accept, all will be lost. Do not doubt that. The warning signs have already been given: look at the breakdown of the family in America and ask yourself, "Are free sex and homosexuality helping or hurting the human family ?" Any objective study of not only biblical history but also the fall of the Roman Empire will unmistakenly answer this question.

I urge you, therefore, to continue your quest and never abandon your responsibility. With unwavering faith we will make Dartmouth a community of which God can be proud.

Sincerely,

Rev. Gunnard Z. Johnston

Mr. Holland's Opus

It is rare to find a film today that does not depend on sex, violence or profanity to make money-and that is not made for an audience under the age of seven. However, we are being treated to a wonderfully rich film this season. A film which speaks of love, the challenges of parenthood, and what it means to live for the sake of others. The film I am speaking of is Mr. Holland's Opus, starring Richard Dreyfuss. While I am not a fan of Richard Dreyfuss, I was deeply moved by his performance in this film. He presented a character that was real and believable-someone with whom all of us could identify.

Glen Holland is a musician and composer who turns to teaching high school students in a small town in Oregon. Mistakenly, Holland, a former studio musician thinks that teaching will afford him more time to write his great musical "opus." He is quickly warned about this misperception by a fellow teacher, the football coach, when the coach responds one day that: "Free time? Gee, what's that? I haven't had free time since I started teaching!"

Like many new teachers, Glen Holland assumes that all he needs to do is impart knowledge to his students. That bubble bursts as well halfway through his first year. Of course, by that time, the plot thickens as he learns that he is to be a father. What occurs over the next thirty minutes or so is a renewed faith in education and teaching. Holland gradually learns that teaching is not just a nine- to-five job-it is a commitment of heart and sacrifice. Through his frustration to have his students actually learn something, he comes to realize that "learning" also involves one's heart as well as their mind. Holland also sees that learning requires a great deal of sacrifice on the part of the teacher as well; a sense of dedication to the students-much as a parent must sacrifice for their children. That is where the film makes one of its best contributions to the movie- going public.

The second contribution that the film makes is in the parenting arena. Shortly after the birth of Holland's son, it becomes clear that he is profoundly deaf. This is particularly hard for the father to take because he dreamed of opening up the world of music to his son, made all the more difficult because the son is named after Holland's favorite musician-the great John Coltrane. It is at this point that Holland the parent immerses himself in his role as Holland the teacher; something which does not sit well with Holland's wife and son.

It is at this point that most films show the wife leaving the husband out of frustration and anger, and the son going off to lead a life of crime, violence or aimlessness. Fortunately, the creator of Mr. Holland's Opus decides that he will buck the trend of Hollywood and have the family work through this obstacle with grace and love.

Throughout all of this, sits the unfinished "Opus." In the end, it becomes clear that Holland has been writing an opus of a different kind. This opus is written on the hearts and minds of each one of his students throughout his 30 year teaching career.

Mr. Holland's Opus is the second "teacher" film since 1995 that encourages us to look to the essence of education. In Dangerous Minds, which came out last autumn, we saw a similar kind of lesson. Michelle Pfeiffer portrayed a woman embarking on a second career -teaching. She too goes through a dramatic transformation. Her students are quite a bit tougher, though, than Holland faces. Coming from south central L.A., her students are the tough, hardened students living in crime- ridden neighborhoods that we often see on television or in the movies. However, I found Mr. Holland's Opus to be more free of the usual hidden agenda that we find in many socially-conscious films today.

As a teacher, I too once thought that befriending my students was important. As I faced difficult classes in New York City schools, I wanted to empower them to rise above their circumstances. All of which sounded good at the time. Reality taught me something different, though. Students don't need their teachers to be their friends. And it is extremely arrogant to think that I can "empower" a young boy or girl to rise above their lot in life.

Students need teachers who can not only provide them with the content of education, but also the boundaries and tools with which they can lead responsible, principled lives that can return deep and eternal joy to God. That means they also need discipline -nurturing-and commitment from the adults around them. Much like a second set of parents-or at least teachers with a parental heart.

And that is why I appreciated Mr. Holland's Opus. As Dreyfuss learned the hard lessons of parenting his own son, he became a better teacher. What became clear is that the lessons we learn as parents can be applied to our roles as teachers. The centrality of the home as the first school of love and life is undeniable. Had the lead character in this film only learned how to be a "good" teacher, I would not be writing this review. But, because he came to not only understand how to measure his true contributions in life, but to also understand his responsibility as a parent, the film became remarkable.

I can only pray that when all is said and done, I too can write an "opus" that brings music to God's ears!

Middle School in Korea

by Michael Stewart-Seoul, Korea

I came to Korea in 1994. During my time here I've learned a lot of Korean, but more importantly I've grown up a lot. Before I came to Korea, I didn't have much of a spiritual life. I also knew nearly no Korean. Well, now at least I hear morning services every morning and read DP pretty frequently. I can have a fairly decent conversation in Korean, too (I'm not by any means fluent).

Anyway, when I first came here I thought it was because my parents wanted me to learn Korean. Now I don't really think that's all they had in mind. I think I was sent here to grow up. I don't really think I was such a wonderful person when I first came. I think that my image of myself was pretty bloated up. I needed something like Korea to teach me things like "Think of others" or "Don't be a loser." I think I've learned things like this and much more. It's taught me to be a friend. Now when I think of coming to Korea, I view learning Korean as a secondary part of being here. The most important part of being here is discovering yourself as well as the person you want to become.

In the time that you are away from America, you can see the luxuries that you normally overlook while you're there. While I've been here I've come to appreciate my parents more than I ever would have in America. I've come to know people from all over the world. And I've made friends who will last a lifetime. I'm really going to miss some people here, but at the same time I look forward to my friends in America.

This last couple of days I've been relatively alone because all the other people are at home now. I pretty much spent the last couple of days buying gifts, eating junk food, watching movies and packing. I think I'm ready to go now.

Right about now, Korea doesn't look as bad as it did while I was here. I always thought that I would love to go home, but now it doesn't seem like the big, wonderful thing that it used to be. But I'm also ready to get on the plane.

In closing, I'd like to thank the teacher of this year and last, and those who made it possible for me to be here. I'd also like to say good-bye to all my friends here. As Malcolm Allen said last year, "If you come to Korea and don't learn a word of Korean all year, but become a better person, then your year wasn't a waste."

Jin-A Children Perform at God's Day and for Clifton Mayor

by Sarah Ribble-Belleville, NJ

Forty Jin-A children and alumni performed for True Parents and guests from around the world at this year's True God's Day evening performance. Many children were dressed in cultural costumes representing their heritage. The children sang two Korean songs and several English songs including an original song titled "True Parents" written especially for the occasion by Ken Hendricks. The singing was led by Mrs. Anna Collura-Keck, Jin-A head teacher for seven years, and Mrs. Shanker, the Korean teacher at Jin-A, accompanied by Ken Hendricks on guitar.

Jin-A is in its eighth year of operation as a licensed and certified childcare center and has pioneered incredible milestones in children's education. Over 300 children have graduated from Jin-A and over 1,000 children have attended for varying lengths of time. Jin-A has also been providing a broad cultural and educational program including karate, dance, Kindermusic, Kumon and Computertotts.

With the excellent foundation of caring and learning they have received, Jin-A graduates go on to excel in their elementary schools. Still, graduates feel a deep connection and love for this special place and friendships which begin at Jin-A continue throughout the years.

Children Carol for City Workers

This is the fourth year that children from Jin-A Childcare Center went to spread holiday cheer to City Hall, in appreciation for their service to the city of Clifton. A group of 15 four- and five-year-olds sang Christmas carols for city workers including the mayor, police chief and fire chief. The mayor looked forward to their coming and gave each child a coloring book.

After the caroling, some children visited Eva's Family Center for homeless families in Paterson. This year, the Jin-A children and parents collected two big boxes of clothing, $270, hot chocolate and candy to give to those in need. In the last few years, children have collected donations for UNICEF and relief efforts in Yugoslavia, Russia and Rwanda.

Is Sexual Purity Out-of-Date?

by Haven Bradford Gow

In Greenville, Miss., Lon Pepper serves with honor and distinction as a county government official; but he takes greater pride in the fact that he is a long-time member of and Sunday School teacher at First Baptist Church in Greenville. In a recent talk at First Baptist Church, Mr. Pepper spoke about today's pernicious moral/sexual climate and the need to practice sexual purity.

According to Mr. Pepper, sexual permissiveness has hurt this nation badly; he pointed out that sex is used by advertisers to sell anything and everything, including cars, cigarettes and liquor. The rate of sexually transmitted diseases, he noted, has skyrocketed during the past three decades; and so have teen pregnancies and illegitimate births. Sexual license has led to broken homes and marriages, he observed.

Mr. Pepper traced the breakdown of sexual morality to the deleterious influences of the Playboy philosophy and to TV programs, movies and literature which promote immoral and irresponsible sexual activity. Because of the immense impact of the media and popular magazines, he said, it is becoming increasingly more difficult for Christian parents and grandparents to guide and protect their children and grandchildren.

In sharp contrast to the Playboy philosophy of sex and human beings is the Christian perspective; the Christian view celebrates and affirms the sacredness of sex, marriage, family and human life. As Mr. Pepper noted in his talk, the Bible firmly insists on the need to practice sexual purity; we know from the Bible that marriage of a man and a woman is for a lifetime, and that adultery is never morally justified. When a man and a woman marry, they become "one flesh" and their bodies must be presented to God as "living sacrifices."

Mr. Pepper pointed out that, even in the animal world, there are animals such as the eagle which have only one mate; God is using such examples from the animal world to teach us that a man and his wife must become as one in marriage as well.

Leotis Taylor, a Good Samaritan and member of First Baptist Church in Eudora, Ark., regretfully says that the concept of sexual purity has become out-of-date; he points out that young people today are adversely affected by what they see on TV and in the movies; he states: "Some TV shows and movies can be educational and helpful, but most of today's films and TV shows are destructive and devastating to the morals, minds and conduct of young people. Too many kids today imitate what they see on TV and in the movies, which have become sexually explicit. Kids today see beautiful actresses take off their clothes and then have sex with their lovers, and so it is getting more and more difficult to teach kids to practice purity."

Clearly, we need to teach young people to behave as good human beings, and not like animals, and let them know they possess the God-given ability to develop purity of heart, mind and soul; we must tell them that, if they really love someone, they must remain pure until giving of themselves selflessly and lovingly within the sacrament of marriage. By remaining pure until marriage, they will never have to feel guilty about past indiscretions, nor will they have to feel ashamed of looking into the eyes of their husbands and wives.

The beauty and wisdom of the Judeo-Christian perspective on sex and marriage is in its teaching that a husband and wife not only become two-in-one physically but also two-in-one mentally, psychically and spiritually. True love within marriage means we desire the genuine good and happiness of one's spouse, and there simply is no room for selfishness and the pursuit of a purely self-centered happiness.

Mr. Gow is a columnist who has published more than 1,000 articles and reviews in 100 magazines and newspapers; he is a graduate of Boston College and the son of the late Mr. and Mrs. Joseph and Elizabeth Gow.

Is Critical Academic Study Conducive to Absolute Faith?

by Charles Kannal, January 1996

Seminaries across the country have come under fire from their own denominations. Young aspirants for Christian ministry enroll with high hopes of increasing their faith through scholarly pursuit of the Bible and other disciplines. All too often they come away, their faith reeling from exposure to new doubts. Unificationists are not immune to this phenomenon.

Contested at the Unification Theological Seminary class debate last November, this topic sparked lively discussion among students and faculty. Based on the results of the formal debate, critical academic study is not conducive to absolute faith.

As in any well-run debate, the judges rated the skill and teamwork of the contestants, rather than the validity of the question at hand. Awards rightfully went to the dynamic junior class team of Ron Poppalardo, Iwok Izuma and Narafumi Suganuma. Christopher McKeon, Simon Bedelo and I (Charles Kannal) did a less satisfactory job for the Divinity class team. In spite of the prognosis against academic study, President Theodore Shimmyo happily declared the debate a success, because none of the participants suggested that we close down the Seminary.

The topic itself generates further questions: Absolute faith in what? How are faith and intellectual endeavor connected? What is meant by absolute faith? What is the nature of critical academic study? Can clear distinctions be made between belief, faith and knowledge?

The dictionary calls belief "probable knowledge; mental conviction, acceptance of something as true." And faith is "belief without evidence." The New Testament describes faith as the reality (substance, assurance) of something not yet seen (Hebrews 11:1).

Is absolute faith the same as blind faith? Or is it more like knowledge, something beyond doubt? Epistemology (the study of the nature, limits and validity of human knowledge) admits that much of what we know is based on experience. Yet how completely can we trust our own experience?

It is relatively simple to argue that absolute faith in anything less than that which is Absolute will be misdirected. Absolute faith implies the humility to recognize the limits of one's own knowledge, and the wisdom to trust another who is the Source of all knowledge.

The most powerful faith has been demonstrated by people who never studied academically: Noah, Abraham, the Virgin Mary, Joan of Arc, etc. Some, like Jesus and Saint Joan, upheld their faith in opposition to the highly respected religious scholars of their day. Academic study, as such, seems unnecessary for absolute faith.

On the other hand, there are numerous examples of great faith among those who were assisted in some way by higher education: early Fathers of the Church like Saints Augustine, Irenaeus, Basil, Gregory Nazianzus, and John Chrysostom; St. Thomas Aquinas; Martin Luther; Calvin; St. Xavier; in more recent times, Mohandas Gandhi and Martin Luther King, Jr. One could argue that none of these had faith that was absolute. Or that their faith was strong in spite of rather than because of academic study. But evidence favors the observation that for these people, critical study was conducive to strengthening their faith.

As for students whose faith was weakened or destroyed by critical analysis or skepticism, we can deduce that such faith was not fixed in the Absolute. Modern academic study is well-suited to tearing down misdirected faith. But does it do anything to help build up absolute faith?

My first impressions of critical academic study as applied to the Bible were not favorable. Science works remarkably well in explaining the physical world. It has proved less accurate but still very valuable regarding human nature and social relationships. But there is something irreverent about applying cold, scientific examination to time-honored holy books. Historical criticism, literary criticism, form criticism, etc.-all seem designed to find fault and destroy faith in God's Word. Can human science rightly evaluate that which is divinely inspired? It is like man judging God.

Challenged by life's difficulties and sorrow, but also rocked by doubts from skeptical academia, my faith has weathered storms, cast aside some misdirected loyalties, and come to rest more fully in the Absolute Reality. For example, at one time I was inclined to call the Bible the absolute Word of God. I have since recognized the limitations of the written Word, and placed my hope in the Living Word Who is beyond expression in human language. That is not to detract from the Bible, for its enduring message leads us to the Eternal Word. "The Christian faith is centered in Christ, not a book, not a code of behavior, not a philosophical truth, not an institution. The Bible is indispensable to the living relationship of Christ to the church. Nothing but the Bible participates in the authority of the living Christ. God's saving work requires an encounter with the Savior. Without the Bible, such an encounter could not take place. One cannot simply read the NT to know the reality of Jesus. There is a transcendent factor. The authority of the Bible is the living Christ speaking through the Holy Spirit." (Professor Henry O. Thompson, Authority, The Bible, Who Needs It? [Delhi: ISPCK, 1994] p. 114; summarizing Herbert H. Farmer's "The Bible: Its Significance and Authority," from the Interpreter's Bible, vol. 1 (1952) pp. 3- 31).

Ironically, universities-the very institutions wherein religious values are now so stringently questioned-were founded by the Church. The original purpose of critical academic study was to find truth. The primary meaning of "critical" is "disposed to judge or discriminate with care and precision." Only secondary are its implications of "severe judgment" and "faultfinding." Exposing fault burns away falsehood so that truth alone remains.

Frederick Copleston, S.J. observes that "The history of philosophy exhibits man's search for Truth by the way of the discursive reason. ...the search for truth is ultimately the search for Absolute Truth, God, and even those systems of philosophy which appear to refute this statement, e.g. Historical Materialism, are nevertheless examples of it, for they are all seeking, even if unconsciously, even if they would not recognize the fact, for the ultimate Ground, the supremely Real. Even if intellectual speculation has at times led to bizarre doctrines and monstrous conclusions, we cannot but have a certain sympathy for and interest in the struggle of the human intellect to attain Truth." (A History of Philosophy, Volume I, New York: Doubleday 1985, [original copyright 1946] p. 6).

A truly honest critical study will also be critical of itself and acknowledge its own limitations. In fact, every realm of academic pursuit relies upon axioms which are accepted more or less on faith. The skepticism in academia; the antagonism between science and religion; the "inevitable" historical split between philosophy and theology; are manifestations of the mind/body split which has so plagued humanity since the Fall. Academic study itself needs purification and a return to its original purpose.

Rev. Sun Myung Moon consistently addresses this need. "Philosophy and religion are different; philosophy is theory and profuse talk, writing and books. Philosophy can guide us in our search for God, but religion promotes both word and deed-the actual encounter with our Heavenly Father. That is the difference-through religion we can experience God. All great philosophy is eventually connected to religion, because it also searches after the cause of the universe. When philosophy finds God, it should develop into a religion in order to make an impact on human lives." (from his sermon "The End of the World and Our Age," given March 3, 1989 at the World Mission Center). And Rev. Moon's prediction (Divine Principle p. 4) that "The day must come when religion and science advance in one united way," is coming to pass.

For insight into the burgeoning overlap between science and religion, I recommend The Mind of God: The Scientific Basis for a Rational World (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1992). The author, physicist Paul Davies, acknowledges that logic and empirical science have limitations in "addressing the sort of 'why' (as opposed to 'how') questions we want to ask." (p. 226; cf. p. 15). And he suggests that mysticism or revelation might provide a route to knowledge that bypasses or transcends human reason (p. 24).

The more I investigate, the more I am convinced that true critical academic study leads to God, the Absolute Reality, and promotes absolute faith.

I'm in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Campus Minister for last 7 years.

By Kasia Stevens.

Special families

Hopeful eyes looked up at me from the classified column of the UC News a few months back. They were the eyes of my dear friends, the Abadias from Puerto Rico who were proclaiming to the Unification Community their desire for a baby. Right below their ad was a second ad from another couple who live and work in Puerto Rico, The Fruends, who were also expressing the same longing.

I worked with the Abadias and the Fruends for three years in Puerto Rico. I was their so-called "leader" and honestly speaking it was at their expense that I have grown a little in maturity.

The Abadias were a previously married couple who have since traveled the long arduous path to the Blessing. I remember listening to Conchita tell me about the various twists and turns her doctor visits were taking in her quest to fight infertility. I tried to understand what she was telling me, but honestly speaking I had little clue about what she was experiencing. How ironic that I would face the same challenges only a few years later. The Abadias steadily love God through any difficulty.

Peter and Kimiko Fruend have been working in Puerto Rico for 15 years or more. They successfully distribute Ginseng Up. When I was there, Peter signed for the church car and the insurance. After I got into two accidents and made his insurance soar, he was a little angry. Somehow, the financial responsibility of having a car never got through to me until after I left Puerto Rico. When I had to buy my own insurance, I finally realized what he was trying to explain to me about it. He was the type of brother whom you could count on for what I call "real" love i.e., financial help when you need it without any laying any guilt trip on you. He and Kimiko could be counted on to treat at the restaurant. They often brought a small something to church for no reason. He and Kimiko bridged the international barriers in their relationship. They are kind, loyal and supportive.

After I left Puerto Rico, I decided that I wanted to give a baby to one of those couples. I wanted to return something to that island to which I had contributed so little. Ever since I had heard that we make those kinds of offerings in our church, I wanted to make one. I wanted to make that sacrifice and give that special gift. Puerto Rico is sort of a lost place between being a part of the US and being independent. The members fight the isolation. These couples have gone such an difficult and unexpected way with so little complaint that I couldn't help but to praise them and feel for their difficulty.

Later I realized that I would not be able to help anyone with a baby since I could not have one of my own. It would be me that grew tired of looking at the "New Arrival" section of the UC News. Don't worry, I do enjoy that section, but I thought we should change the title to "Family Corner", so my husband and I could send in our picture along with our dog "Scoots." I wanted my brothers and sisters to know that I was still alive and well and loving others. I wanted to be remembered and celebrated, too.

These feelings started me thinking about all our special families in the UC such as those who have lost spouses, those who have had children with diseases, as well as those who cannot have children and feel no hope of ever receiving an offering child. Let's pay tribute to those families, to embrace them and take a moment of thought for them. They are saints in our church who take the less than ideal situations that face them and make them into a piece of Heaven. I want our church to be a church that can remember those in need.

Explosion Rocks French HSA HQ

by Laurent Ladouce-Paris, France

This is an excerpt from a press release from the church in Paris, France.

An explosion of great force partially damaged the entrance to HQ of the French Unification Church on Monday, January 29th, at 4:00 am .

Very fortunately, there were no injuries among the few occupants of the building; some missionaries passing through Paris en route to their mission countries.

The metal shutters over the front entrance of 9 Rue de Chatillon, which are closed during the night , were ripped. The metal beams of the ceiling littered the entrance, as well as numerous shattered windows. Arriving quickly at the scene, the police officials of the 14th district as well as the firemen, proceeded to make a rapid evaluation of the damage. The president of the HSA-UWC , Mr. Laurent Ladouce, 38 years old, arrived at the scene about 4:45, having come from his home.

The origin of this explosion is still undetermined, but all evidence suggests a criminal act. An explosive device appears to have been placed in front of the entrance. HSA-UWC has declared its confidence that the police will discover the origins of this attack.

Prior to this incident, HSA received no telephone warning or threat whatsoever, written or verbal. Furthermore, no individual or group until now has claimed responsibility, materially or morally, for this apparent attack. The assistant to the mayor of the 14th district, who came to the scene, was able to personally confirm to the police the peaceful character of our relationship with the immediate neighborhood.

Consequently, in the absence of any precise manifestation concerning hostility against us, we can only remind the authorities, and the public opinion of this country, as well as men and women of the press, of the absolute duty to respect without any restriction or reserve the freedom of thought and belief, which is one of the foundations of the Republic. All media campaigns founded on ill-considered amalgamations , all "sect-hunts" (to borrow a very ill-advised expression from "Le Point" magazine) instigated by pressure groups, are susceptible to spark blind violence at any moment.