Three Andy Morris Poems

A Time To Bend

Trees that bend and quake in the wind
Yet, seldom do they break a limb
They toss and flail
And let leaves sail
Like drops of water
From a young girl's hair
Shaking her head
After taking a shower
The young trees take delight in this
As if the wind were made for bliss
But the old trees seem to creak and moan
As if they'd rather be left alone
While the wind just seems to take delight
In testing them against its might
Which is stronger, the wind or the tree?
Both of them seem weak to me
The tree is too set in its ways to move
While the wind always seems to have something to prove
But the young trees seem to understand
There's a time to bend
And a time to stand

Carefree

Many times I wished
That I
Could be a carefree
Butterfly
Though surely
They must have some care
You'd never know it
By the way
They float on air
Viewing them
At one quick glance
You'd say
They lived their lives
By chance
But taken over time
You'd know
There's order
In their ebb and glow
But I think it suits
The butterflies
To keep their order
In disguise
So "ordered" men
Like you and I
Can marvel
At the way they fly

My Flower

My wife is a fragile flower
I support her with all my strength
And hold her fast against the wind
Sometimes I bow
To ice and rain
As humans will
To vice and pain
But 'tis then that she leans over me
Offering her beauty
Until the sun comes out again
Then I lift her high above me
And offer her the glory
My wish
When time
Has left my life
An hour
Is this
That I
Am with my wife
My flower

Andy Morris

The Resolution Of The Two-Party System: Marriage As A Model For Political Society

Uviews:

I would like to posit three characteristics of ideas introduced by religious geniuses: one, they are rejected by the mainstream of their own society; two, their brilliance is recognized gradually, as the distance from the origin increases; and three, as this brilliance is recognized, so too it is recognized that these great ideas bring to a fulfillment the thought of the previous age.

That this is not readily apparent is due in part to the fact that most people are not cognizant of the inherited worldview and even less of the new ideas, nor do most people really care about worldviews. Like fashion and architecture, a worldview is just there by seeming necessity.

Another fact obscuring these characteristics is that they are apparent from the perspective of the new thought more than of the old. In fact the old thought eventually may react against the new thought and adjust its own parameters to eliminate the resemblance. For example, Christians believe their thought to be the fulfillment of Judiasm, with, as the centerpiece, Christ as the final sacrificial offering. Jews of course reject this claim over their tradition, finding other reasons for the end of the practice of making burnt offerings.

It is my observation, based upon study of Christian theology and of Unification theology, that Unificationism is indeed what it claims to be, the fulfillment of the New Testament Age, in exactly the terms it states: from "image" restoration to "substance" restoration. To put it more simply, what Christianity did symbolically, Unificationism is doing substantially. Christians did it in heaven; Unificationists are bringing it to earth.

One Party or Two?

Let that be a prologue to an essay on an idea of Reverend Moon's which, to me at least, sounded utopian at first hearing, and, beyond that, I did not really perceive any use to it other than (believe it or not) political correctness, a heavenly affirmative action. After reflection, however, I see that this idea actually makes a tremendous amount of sense in theory, because it offers the resolution of the deadlocked two-party system. This idea is that each elective governmental office should be the co-responsibility of a man and a woman. What this idea does is eliminate the problems created by the two-party system, while preserving the benefits.

Why do we have two parties in the first place? Democratic republicanism is taken to require a two-party system. But there was a time when it was effectively one-party, in the early national period, when there was a national consensus of values. Democracy, then, does not require two political parties, at least in the usual sense of political parties as conflictive sets of candidates representing divergent directions for society. The less consensus as to general direction, of course, the more the parties will diverge from each other; the more consensus, the less divergence.

The current campaigns give us a good sense of the problems of a two- party system. Having two parties competing for each office polarizes the system. One party will line up along one side of the ideological map, and the other will take the other side. Although it doesn't seem necessary logically, it seems that in practice candidates tend to define themselves in negative instead of positive terms (i.e., what they stand against rather than what they stand for). It has degenerated from being a contest between the greater of two goods to one between the lesser of two evils--as I saw a recent Washington Times cartoon in which one fellow asks another, "who are you voting against?" The winner is the one who is more effective at vilifying his opponent. Thus the effect of electioneering is to give the impression that all candidates for political office are dishonest, immoral men and women. Thus the system is destructive of idealism and hope.

The Black Muslim faith moved into the black communities of America in the 1930s through its leader, Wallace Fard, simply publicizing what the Christian churches were saying about each other. The conclusion was that they were all blasphemous and ungodly.

At the same time, we cannot desire a bland or, worse, coercive uniformity. The benefit of the two-party system is that the party system, at its best, injects dynamism and creativity into government. It is a safeguard against complacency and stagnancy; it creates, ideally, laboratories for new ideas. When it doesn't work well, however, it stagnates in the rut of political correctness and the temptation to appeal to the lowest common denominator (the winner often the one who can discover one lower than his opponent).

Male/Female Principle

The alternative to the two-party system, thus far, has been seen to be the one-party state. We have various communist, socialist, monarchic and fascist experiments in the twentieth-century which demonstrate the destructive results of one-party systems, the least of which, perhaps, is stagnation, the worst of which is the abuse of power for the purpose of maintaining the consensus through coercion. The United States maintained national unity for 200 years, under the canopy of Christian faith fired by revivalism. Revivalism is now the method used by politicians, and in any case it never could answer its critics, who now comprise a massive secular-humanist bloc.

The question is, then, how to preserve dynamism and creativity and at the same time consensus and unity. Another way to put it is: how can divergent social models and their resultant policies combine in a system of mutual stimulation and growth, instead of separating, demonizing each other, and fighting (destroying society in the process)?

The answer is to recognize the cause and nature of the dynamism itself, and systematize it in a natural way. The root of the dynamism is a logic implicit in the thinking process itself which seems to give two answers to every question, and hence to lead society in two directions simultaneously. The nature of the dynamism is most aptly described within the parameters of the male/female principle. That is, what is going on is that we are struggling between the masculine and feminine answers to the problems, tending to see them as mutually exclusive enemies.

Gendermandering

Now, to assign the blame! The left, I would generalize, is the relatively feminine partner: embracing, reconciling, concerned about welfare and working for fairness. The left is concerned about the whole from the point of view of love: compromise, nurturing, toleration, management and maintenance. The feminine would be concerned more than the masculine with the real problems of real people, and would invest resources into solving these. It views the constituency as children who need parental (which is in reality taken to mean "motherly") care. The left, then, does not consider property rights as important as human rights and the rights of defenseless species. The right, then, would be the relatively masculine counterpart, emphasizing competition, creativity and concern about opportunity and expansion. The right might be said to survey the whole from the point of view of standards, judgment, challenge, development, and striving for excellence. The masculine would tend more than the feminine to deny the present reality and to leave the resources with the people who earned them (private ownership). It views the constituency as independent agents best left on their own, to succeed or fail and accept the consequences without a safety net.

These are generalizations, but generalizations often serve a purpose. Emboldened by this confidence, let us develop this thinking a bit further, to see where it might lead. St. Paul used the human body as the model for the church, with individuals carrying out different but equally valuable functions analogous to the physical organs. The Divine Principle also uses the model of "ideal man" as the model for political society, even specifying body parts which are analogous to the legislature, executive, judiciary, economy, etc.

This model can be expanded based upon Rev. Moon's recent discussions of the ideal political system as having men and women equally involved, even legislative districts electing both a man and woman representative, and this partnership of the sexes applying across the board. Underlying this is the theological notion of God as the unified body of masculine and feminine characteristics.

The Body Politic

Taking a cue from this, could we not utilize not an individual body, but a husband and wife together as the model for social order? Now, if a man represents all men, let's say that his millions of sperm represent all individual men. I have often, actually, viewed the primary dynamic of society to be summed up in terms of expanded sperm (men) trying to unite with expanded eggs (women). In other words, all social activities, language, customs and traditions are the dressing up of these sperm bodies trying to find the best egg body and become one with them.

Then, the most important function of society is to regulate this dynamic into orderly modes of operation, that is, the monogamous relationship based upon publicly sanctioned and celebrated marriage. So, this would correspond to the completion of one sperm uniting with one egg, which is also the beginning of a new life.

The idea of electing men and women to all offices would lead to society modeled on the harmony, joy and creative power of a husband and wife in union. The hopeful side of this, I think, is that it provides the means to resolve the antagonistic and conflictual relations between the two parties, liberal and conservative. Liberal and conservative are feminine and masculine. As there has until now been no historical foundation for masculine/feminine unity in marriage, the masculine and feminine parties, representing the masculine and feminine viewpoints or principles, have conflicted in the governmental sphere. However, once the true principle of masculine/feminine unity is established in the marriage of the True Parents, the same unity can obtain in society.

Thus, society can embody the dynamics of masculine and feminine energies, priorities and qualities, yet keep them in balance and harmony. Masculine and feminine impulses would be harmonized through love and affectin

Of course it is a given that men and women do not follow strict "party lines". Just as there are conservative democrats and liberal republicans, so too there will be outspoken and competitive women alongside embracing and tolerant men. Still, the mindset of the two groupings will be identifiable and distinct, and it will require all the skills of both sides to reach harmony, just as it does in a marriage. However, as with a marriage, there is a natural law, the power of the universe itself, supporting the union of the two sets of characteristics through the personal commitment of love.

Concluding unscientific postscript: The reader might ask, if this is all true, then why do not women in our society vote democratic as a bloc, and men vote republican? I would answer, first of all, it is men only who fashioned and control both the parties, and so both parties are relatively masculine. Politics has been a masculine profession. Nonetheless, am I wrong to observe that most female candidates for political office are democrats? That most activist women are on the political left? Note as well the historical phenomenon of the "feminization" of American society, examined by historians such as Ann Douglas and Barbara Welter: this feminization took place among constiutencies of the left: the Unitarians, liberal Congregationalists (today's UCC) and Episcopalians.

The Profundity of Transcribing Father's Speeches

by June Saunders-NYC

Father's profundity is almost ineffable, and we fumble to express it to others. Yet there are times when the very stones themselves ("sermons in stones"!) seem to cry out with the same words and testify to him, as Jesus told the doubting Israelites that the stones themselves would testify to him if the people were silenced.

I had one experience this summer that brought Father's profundity home to me in a unique way. I live in the idyllic little town of Red Hook, in the seminary environs. There are tire swings on the trees, white houses, red barns, fruit falling from the trees, and the young people tend to be friendly and respectful. At times it seems to me I have somehow stumbled upon a time warp and am walking down the streets of Small Town, America around the turn of the century. I can hear the clip-clop of horses, I can feel the ambiance, the church-centeredness of community life, the closeness to the earth, the wistful purity and simplicity that is America at its very best.

This spring there were blossoms everywhere and to amble down the quiet side streets of Red Hook where there is a Civil War-era graveyard was to enter into a dream-like state.

However, this summer there was a dreadful stabbing murder right downtown on the main street. The town was up in arms and everyone was shocked and frightened. For weeks the atmosphere was so punctured that people walked around with dour faces. "It will be a little less happy place to live now," said one resident, accurately.

But all things pass out of mind and consciousness and over the weeks, Red Hook's ambiance reasserted itself. I went back under its spell until one day I was walking along with my children, admiring a bright bevy of spring flowers, when the very ground seemed to cry out to me in anguish: "I am blood-stained! This is blood-stained land!" I was several blocks from where it had taken place, but, of course, the earth is one. The memory of the murder and of Father's words rushed back to me.

I have had the honor of transcribing and editing many of Father's speeches. Father' has referred numerous times to a 200-volume set of his sermons which exists in Korean. Hyo Jin Nim has also mentioned at Belvedere that he has studied some of the material himself. Both Father and Hyo Jin Nim assured us that there is ample material for guidance within them and enjoined us to learn Korean. Father, in his mercy, has decided that the very wondrous and profound guidance from his weekly Sunday sermons starting in 1953 on should be translated into English. It is an enormous concession and grace to the English- speaking world.

When I first heard that such a volume of work existed, my fingers contracted with desire, and I said to myself, "How I'd love to get my hands on that as an editor!" And I prayed to Heavenly Father that if Father ever, ever, by any chance had those 200 volumes of sermons translated into English (I never thought he would) I wanted to be the editor.

Now that wish has come true and these rich and profound speeches, most of which deal with Jesus and the Holy Spirit, are now being made available in English through the HSA-UWC publications department.

In one of the speeches I had been working on, Father had repeatedly referred to this "blood-stained" land. He was referring specifically to Korea, but of course, all of the earth is one. It is round, it is whole, it is connected. All land then, since the death of Abel, is really blood-stained. But in the sleepy little town of Red Hook, that is sometimes hard to fathom. The ideal of life seems closer than the horrendous reality of the fallen world. But when the very ground called out to me with Father's words, my complacency was shaken.

We go along and become inured to the travails of life unless they touch us directly. But Father does not become inured. He hears the cry of the blood-stained land, crying since the time of Abel. He feels it, and he preaches about it, and he takes action to restore it.

I believe that these books of Father's sermons have the power to revitalize the American movement; therefore, they have the power to revitalize America through us. When I have used Father's prayers at the beginning of each sermon as the material for my own prayers, even reading the prayers aloud in substitution for my own fumblings and grapplings toward communing with the Almighty-I have felt a unity and connectedness with other members that lit up hearts. I have felt the grace of God pour down upon my altar. I have literally felt myself in front of "the Father's knees" as True Father put it, bathed in the whiteness of His robe, cowering before the throne, not daring to lift my face, begging to wipe my tears on the hem of His garment, begging if I might kiss one stitch on the hem of His garment.

We are now working on Volume 3 of the speeches. Volume I is now available and Volume II is being printed. Each Volume contains about 20 speeches and so far all of them have been about Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit. This is wondrous witnessing material for anyone who deals with Christians. Father's heart-and-bone relationship with Jesus, his enormous praise for Jesus, his analysis of the heavenly accomplishments of Jesus, and his ability to bring you right into the streets of Jerusalem, gazing into Jesus' eyes through Peter's, reaching for the resurrected body with Mary Magdalene, would deepen anyone's relationship with Jesus Christ.

Father's depiction of Jesus' heart and pain is the most vivid and detailed we have ever heard. Many intricate theological points are thoroughly explained-about the Trinity, about why Jesus said he was the "way, the truth, and the life" and many other points. For anyone who has ever misunderstood our teachings about why and how Jesus' mission is considered to be incomplete, using the harsh word "failure" in an erroneous fashion, these sermons stand as a great correction. The full tragedy of the death of Jesus is elaborately explained and re-explained with enormous empathy, respect, and sorrow for the man Father calls God's "hero of the Word." More than God's son, Father tells us that Jesus was the very body of God, God's love incarnate. He carried the very heart of God in his heart, and he knowingly achieved accomplishments he knew would resound for thousands of years-before, after, and during the crucifixion.

I see Father as he was in 1953-a young man, in his prime, Jesus' age, impassioned, with a great deal of pain and a great deal of hope. He is speaking very much to the Korean-Christian foundation for the reception of the Lord of the Second Advent. He is not declaring himself; he is pointing out the need and the way to prepare.

I really pray that members (and non-members, especially Christians) can read these books and glean from them how terribly much Father loves God and Jesus-and how terribly much the heart of God and yes, the earth itself, cry out to us to right the awful wrongs through the great grace of our era.

A sample from Father's prayers:

"On our hands and feet are the scars left by Satan's arrows, and in our bodies we carry the battle wounds. So, Father of compassion! Please extend Your divine grace to hold our hands and feet full of the scars of Satan's arrows, to grip our wounded bodies, to apply the oil of life on us, and to wrap our bodies with the bandages of resurrection. We yearn for a word of counsel, so Father, please advise us. We desperately desire it."

The Need for Prayer...Now More Than Ever

Every day we are confronted by a barrage of bad news, crime, violence and evil almost everywhere we look. One glance at the nightly news is enough to make me want to run in the closet, lock the door and never come out.

Yet, being Unificationists, we can never do that. Here we are in our tribal home church areas trying to bring hope, joy, peace and the Kingdom of Heaven to a world that has become cynical, selfish, bitter and hopeless.

How can we work and live in this fallen world and not become overwhelmed by its madness? One important key is the healing and rejuvenating power of prayer.

In the past many of us have done 7-, 12- or 21-minute prayer conditions or have recited the usual contents of prayer, but how many of us make deep prayer a necessary ingredient for the nourishment of our daily spiritual body and soul?

Between working to support our family, taking care of the kids and trying to restore our hometown, do our mission, etc., sometimes it seems impossible to sit down and pray deeply every day. Just to find a place in the house which is quiet enough seems a major accomplishment. Yet it is important we make one.

Prayer can transform the impossible to the possible, the unimaginable to reality, our resentments to our joys and the disunited to unite. Though we cannot see the power of our prayers, God hears every prayer and the spirit world is eager and willing to help us.

In a recent best-selling book, "Embraced by the Light," the author-who journeys into the spiritual world after her death says our prayers are "like beautiful lights in heaven and the strongest ones are usually that of a mother towards her child. God cannot resist these prayers."

But as we all know, sometimes it is not so easy to pray. We have many blocks, mentally and physically, which stop us. Many times we are just too tired or too busy. As we get older, we can no longer run around as we did on MFT to mobilize the spiritual world for help. We cannot be in all places at all times, so we must gain spiritual momentum through the power of our prayers.

Breaking through in prayer means we must confront our own sins and the things which separate us from God. Father has said, "Prayer is the focus of our sincerity." But where do we start?

1. Make a prayer table or a special place in your home just for prayer. Create a holy atmosphere with True Parents' pictures and a beautiful holy candle. Even if it is just a table in your bedroom, kitchen or living room.

2. After the kids leave for school or go to bed at night, find a quest time every day where you can concentrate on nothing but prayer. Give yourself time. At least a half hour if possible.

3. If you are overwhelmed by chaotic thoughts or worries, do something to relax. Play Holy Songs, music (opera opens my hardened heart) or read Father's words. Determine no matter how long it takes, you will stay until you break through in prayer. If my heart is really stale, I rent a movie like "Schindler's List." Whatever it takes to open your heart, it doesn't matter. Find a park or beautiful place to pray if you love to be in nature.

4. Pray specifically. Make a list of things that you want to pray for or specific situations. Tell God and the spiritual world, e.g., "Please open the heart of my sister-in-law who is coming to my house at 8:00 tonight, give her a desire to hear the Divine Principle, etc." Be specific so the spiritual world will know exactly what you want and how to help you.

5. Don't give up. Some things take time, but consistent specific prayer for events and people pays off. Learn to fight in prayer and become a prayer warrior for others. When you are just about to give up, that is when you can break through. Even if you cannot be on the front line, your prayers can support others who are. Recently when I was sick and bedridden, I did a special prayer condition for a sister who was witnessing on a difficult campus up north. Within days she was finally able to break through and said she "felt absolutely the power of my prayer and spirit world helping her." Even if we can't walk, we can still pray!

6. If you are angry or resentful, repentance is the only way to overcome in prayer. If your husband or wife has done something to hurt your heart, repent for them. If you repent for someone who has hurt you, Satan just cannot stand it. God's grace will surely come to you and, sooner or later, God will open their eyes to your suffering.

7. Try to look from God's point of view. Your pain and frustration are not just your own. When you are suffering miserably, realize God is suffering watching you, waiting for you, hoping for you and loving you. Even though you may not be able to feel it at the time. Ask God to take the pain out of your heart and He will. Learn to listen to His voice, and to hear Him speak through others to help you.

8. Pray as a family. It is important to have family prayer daily and pledge service on Sundays, first day of each month and Holy Days. If you are having problems with unity with your spouse or with your children, chances are you are not praying together as a family. Prayer can heal our hearts, our souls and our marriages. We must make it a priority in our lives.

I have never felt God's love so deeply as I have when my husband and I lie in bed together with our little son snuggled in between us and we hold hands and pray together. It is truly like the Kingdom of Heaven on earth. No matter what our difficulties at the time, prayer gives us the strength to carry on.

9. Don't have any concepts! Prayer does not have to be formal to be effective. I have prayed over the telephone with others, in the bathroom, while driving, almost anywhere. If you are sincere, God will hear your prayers. God is your father, your mother, and God is your best friend. Even if no one else understands you, God will never abandon you. I have experienced this a thousand times over. If it is difficult for you to pray alone, find a prayer partner. Praying with a friend can be powerful and effective.

10. God needs you! God needs your prayers, your heart and your love. Many times God wakes me in the middle of the night and says, "Come talk with me," and I do. God is a lonely and suffering being trying to bring this world back to His heart. Without you He cannot do it. If you pray, you will hear Him and feel His tears on your shoulders and gain the inspiration you need to continue loving and giving to others. There is nothing more precious.

We cannot hope to transform our home, tribe, society or nation unless we transform ourselves. We have someone who loves us unconditionally and knows our suffering hearts and can help us to become our best selves. Won't you take a little time to share daily with God? The results will truly be worth it.

The Long Road to Pyongyang

William P. Selig

An eyewitness report on the events leading up to the historic reconciliation between Rev. Sun Myung Moon and the late President Kim Il Sung

The following brief report was compiled by William Selig from notes from a speech given by Antonio Betancourt at the Washington, D.C. Church on Sept. 24, 1994. In it he emphasized that in order to understand the providence of the Korean peninsula in 1994, it is necessary to review recent events, especially the history of the American Church in the late `70s and early `80s.

The strategy of Satan was to destroy Father's foundation because if Father's foundation could be destroyed, there would be no way that America could fulfill her responsibilities regarding God's headache of international communism.

In 1976, after the Washington Monument victory, Satan's strategy was to completely discredit Father; to bring him to the level in which he had to negotiate with America, either to leave America and stay in Korea, or stay here and face jail, persecution, character assassination, and to possibly become a person of no consequence.

God helped in a very interesting way. As Father was losing credit in the United States, God was developing a parallel strategy in Latin America. In God's eyes, the Americas are one. The discovery of America was not the discovery of just North America or the Caribbean, but the discovery of America. For God, north, central and south are one America.

The providence moved to the south through the CAUSA movement. Father's whole strategy of the CAUSA movement was to protect America and allow this country to confront international communism by developing a strategy that would challenge Moscow. The whole strategy in Latin America had as an aim to support Father's providence so Father could stand firmly on the U.S. frontline.

This strategy was accomplished. CAUSA was very successful in Latin America in the early 1980s. Later on we began the CAUSA movement in the U.S. which was followed by the American Constitution Committee (ACC) and American Freedom Coalition (AFC). We put together all the resources at Father's disposal, particularly The Washington Times and brothers and sisters in Washington, New York and all over the country.

Eventually, it is history that we were able to support the United States in this big confrontation with international communism. Father's victories in America brought as a consequence a leadership that was able to force the Soviet Union to bring another kind of leadership that could negotiate with America in the best interest of both and for the advancement of world peace, namely Mikhail Gorbachev.

For years since Washington Monument, we heard Father speak about the march on Moscow. The interesting thing is that we were thinking of an actual march. Here it was, April 11, 1990, and the march on Moscow was taking place but there was no march in the dictionary sense of the word. Yet, Father marched with about 40 former heads of state and government into the Kremlin for the historical visit and embrace with then-President Mikhail Gorbachev.

After the victory in Moscow and that historical reconciliation, Father gave the direction to go into China and Pyongyang. We began an offensive, a diplomatic offensive in China that made us go into the south and build this gigantic project, an automobile factory, which is not operational and is still in the process of revision. But, and this is very important, Panda already worked in one sense. It created the necessary clout and psychological impact to make the people in Pyongyang take Father and our Movement seriously.

At that time, Father directed me to visit the embassy of any country that had relations with Pyongyang and introduce our Movement. In trying to unite with Father, I was kicked out of many embassies. One was the Pyongyang embassy in Beijing. After I introduced Father, they accused me of deceiving them. "We thought you were just a Colombian and you were heading this international organization (i.e., the Summit Council). We never thought that you were an agent of that fascist Moon," and so forth, they said.

They said, "If Moon is serious to engage with our country, first of all he has to repent publicly. He has to apologize for the pain that he has caused our leader and our country for the last 40 years."

In my briefcase, I carried many photographs of Father and Dr. Pak with all the top leaders in Beijing and Moscow, Father with Gorbachev and Dr. Pak with Li Peng and the senior leadership in China. I said, "Look, Rev. Moon and the Unification Church were the enemies of Moscow and Beijing as they have been of Pyongyang. Neither of them asked for repentance in order to engage, and look at these pictures." I showed them the photos of the Panda plans and property. "This is what we are building in southern China. This is Dr. Pak with Li Peng and the PRC President. This is Rev. Moon with Gorbachev. Why should he repent to your country? Besides, if you ask the repentance of Rev. Moon, you have to repent for the things that you have done to our Movement and to Rev. Moon. In 1987 you sent a task force of terrorists to kill him, which was uncovered by the FBI and Rev. Moon was told that you were after him."

The ambassador got completely crazy, and screamed, "Get out, out of my embassy!" Anyway, it's a very long history. Through various channels, we were able to enter Pyongyang in April 1991, one year after the victory in Moscow. Father was insisting that he needed results right away. We were able to convince the North Koreans that Rev. Moon was indeed their friend now, and that Rev. Moon had initiated together with the entire Unification Movement a process of healing and reconciliation towards the DPRK and that we could be their best friend, and help them to connect with the whole world.

It was very, very difficult, but we were able to engage them. We created the International Commission for the Peaceful Reunification of the Korea in September 1991. They were very pleased with the founding of that commission. Through the Commission and a number of overtures, on Nov. 30, 1991 an invitation was extended to Father and Mother to enter Pyongyang. On December 6th, they had their first encounter with Kim Il Sung, in the place where Father departed in 1952. Forty years earlier, Father had departed from Hungnam as a broken man, a man without a mission. The key advisors to Kim Il-sung advised him not to receive Rev. Moon in the place where he departed because psychologically they knew the meaning of this. Yet he decided to meet Rev. Moon in Hungnam where Kim Il Sung had built a beautiful palace.

Father was able to extract an agreement with the DPRK government in the form of a 10 point communique. This had the effect of upsetting South Korea and Japan enormously because it made Father the key player in the process of peace in the peninsula. This was something absolutely intolerable to them. As a consequence, Father had to pay a very big price. Shortly after Father's visit, the Movement experienced its most severe persecution ever. It centered on our financial structure in Japan and created the biggest burden in our Movement's history. In Korea and Japan, the goal of our enemies was to destroy the pipeline of money to the Movement. They succeeded to a large extent, but it wasn't enough to defeat Father.

Our Movement in Korea and Japan almost financially disintegrated. Although the North Koreans recognized what was happening, instead of moving away from our Movement because we were poor, we instead became closer. What Father couldn't give the Koreans in financial support, he gave them in moral support, vision and clarity, in order to help fulfill their most important goal - to establish direct dialogue and settle their relations with the most consequential country in the world - the United States of America.

Father has been behind the Summit Council and helped mobilize the muscle of the former heads of state and government who are part of our International Commission, a former Governor General of Canada, a former president of Costa Rica and numerous other key leaders. Utilizing quiet diplomacy, Father has been working to convince this country that:

1. It is in the interest of the U.S. to dialogue directly with the DPRK.

2. The Koreas cannot allow the situation of the nuclear weapons problem and the problems in the peninsula to be dealt with only between themselves; that it must be led by the United States as the undisputed leader of the free world.

3. This problem is so big and so immense that South Korea cannot solve it alone!

Through the Summit Council, Father has been able to bring the U.S. and the DPRK together. I cannot give you all the details because of lack of space and also because it's very sensitive information, but we have been behind a lot of the back-door diplomacy in what has been accomplished so far.

Nevertheless, we cannot just bring the U.S. and DPRK together alone. We need to bring South Korea, the U.S. and the DPRK together because Father's role is to serve as the peacemaker and harmonizer, and the unifying force for North and South Korea.

Eventually South Korea will understand where its interests are because so far they are blurred. They don't understand what their interests are in the long term. They go along with what the U.S. is doing with the DPRK but with a high degree of resentment, anger and frustration.

Presently, our efforts are focused on helping the South Koreans to comprehend their long-term interests. In the meanwhile, this is allowing the North to slowly come out of the ice. They cannot melt overnight because it would be very destabilizing for South Korea and the region.

We have to create the political and financial mechanisms in order to help them come out of the situation in a face-saving manner. The resolution of the nuclear issue is critical. We are involved in that process. Father gave us five points, and it's important to understand these five points when people ask what is Rev. Moon doing in North Korea and why is the religious leader of the Unification Church involved in North Korea. These five points parallel the interests of South Korea.

WAR IS NOT AN OPTION. We have to avoid war at any cost because the next war, according to Father, will be to the death, a gladiator's war. That is not an option. It must be avoided at all costs. We have to mobilize all the resources within and outside the Unification Church to prevent war.

THE PENINSULA MUST BE DENUCLEARIZED. Therefore, the nuclear weapons problem of North Korea must be resolved. In order to achieve number one and number two, we have to win trust because they haven't trusted anyone. The first person, the first movement that they have trusted in the last 40 years is us. So the trust that we have built with them is not for us, it is for South Korea, the United States and the regional powers, so that it can be used by the regional powers for the resolution of this problem.

REUNION OF SEPARATED FAMILIES. A database must be created that identifies where these families are in the north and in the south. We can begin with a small group, one family, two families, three families, and start to bring them together. This should be done within the next year. The DPRK has committed itself to give that project to us because we are the only ones who can do it selflessly, without looking for our own profit. Everybody else has some ulterior motive.

PROSPERITY MUST BE BROUGHT TO NORTH KOREA. We have to help restructure the economy of that country. As they prosper and achieve financial independence individually, next they will want security to protect their new prosperity. Naturally political reforms will be demanded by the public, but we don't want it the other way around because it's proven that a country that first obtains political freedoms does not necessarily develop economically. One very visible example is Latin America. Despite political freedoms for the last 150 years, there has been little economic development. It has taken too long. The DPRK needs to have normal financial and diplomatic relations with the rest of the world as soon as possible. The Summit Council is assisting in this area.

PREPARATION FOR UNIFICATION. Eventually North and South Korea must unify. This is in accordance with God's will and the flow of history. But unification must be accomplished with the least amount of pain - human and financial.

These five points are the motivation and purpose behind our Movement's work in Korea. We can proclaim it anywhere because they are perfectly sound and noble. People will resent it because they are jealous or frustrated, and because they have 40 years of struggle with the North's ugly history, and because of the Korean War that killed more than 2 million people. But for God's purposes, these criticisms must be put aside. From a religious perspective, we have to be able to forgive and to love.

From a political perspective, we have to think pragmatically: What is in the best interest of the United States? What are the interests of Japan? What are the interests of the regional powers? And above all, what are the interests of the Republic of Korea? Is the resolution of this problem worth one, two, or three million lives? The answer is no.

The victory of the Summit Council is not my victory or Dr. Pak's victory. It is the victory of True Parents together with all of the members who have been paying indemnity for that. We pay collective indemnity, which we can call salvific energy. Salvific energy is created, then Father uses it to collect something.

Our relationship with the DPRK is strong, but we are not agents of juche or of North Korea. We are agents of heaven and our goal is the final resolution of this problem so that we can have peace in the peninsula. And God's providence may be achieved without bloodshed and without economic losses.

Thank you for your prayers and your support.

[As this article was being prepared, on Oct. 21, 1994, the United States and DPRK signed a Framework Agreement in Geneva that, if implemented, will resolve the nuclear issue, reduce trade restrictions and normalize diplomatic relations between the two historic enemies. The Agreement is the beginning of a new era in relations between the countries of Northeast Asia and lifts a tremendous burden off the shoulders of True Parents.]

Antonio Betancourt, Executive Director of the Summit Council for World Peace, assisted Dr. Pak as an emissary that arranged True Parents' hometown visit in November-December 1991, as well as many of the subsequent high-level visits to Pyongyang. Antonio was virtually the only non-Korean present at the funeral of Kim Il Sung.

The Challenge of Effective Campus Work

By Kathy Winings

Student leaders, student club directors, and campus ministers alike face a common challenge. That challenge is to develop and maintain a satisfying and effective community on campus. Especially with today's budget cuts, diminishing resources, and reassessment of maintaining campus facilities, campus ministers across denominational lines are being asked to justify the investment in their programs. The fewer the students who are involved in their ministries and activities, the more challenging this task seems.

While Unification campus ministers may not have to face this particular issue, we do face the ultimate challenge, though, of creating an effective and stable community among our students and friends. What, then, can we do? What is the solution? In talking to students, campus ministers, and others involved in higher education, we discovered a few key points which can serve to guide us in answering these questions.

First, as Brent Waters, chaplain for the University of the Redlands, has suggested, part of our problem may be that we continue to assume that communities and institutions are one and the same. The university is clearly an institution. It has a particular purpose--to provide educational opportunities for its students. Our universities have been asked to fulfill a very pragmatic goal. In that case, they are not overly concerned or designed to create what we have come to recognize as community. Nor should we expect these institutions of higher education to create intentional communities.

However, once the student is finished with his or her courses for the day or week, they begin to focus on their other needs. One of which is a hunger for friendship and association with other students by forming some sort of community. Traditionally, this need for community has been fulfilled by various fraternities, sororities, student clubs, sports, as well as other fields of interest. Through these communities, students are confronted with a panorama of values, ideas and lifestyles which contribute greatly to molding the developing the character and personality of the university student. Hence, as campus ministers seeking to influence this development for God and Christ, we need to better understand the role of community if we are to be successful in attracting students to the community of faith.

What is this thing called "community?" A common understanding of community is that it is a collection of individuals who are bound together by a particular narrative, tradition or purpose which enables them to continue their search for truth. A community is strengthened as its shared memory develops. As Waters has described it, a community is "story formed." But an even more essential component of a community is the sense of clear direction and purpose. A community needs to feel that it is going somewhere. In fact, most associations to which students are attracted provide this exact component.

This is where we believe that campus ministries and their associated religious student clubs can interface. They have the ability and opportunity to provide students with a community experience which supports and nurtures their search for truth. We alone can develop genuine communities through which students can search for truth in an environment of fellow human beings of like heart and mind. Through this community, students can experience a real sense of movement and development, which will motivate them to not only participate in the group, but to be an integral part of the group. But how can one create a truly satisfying community? In the past, many of us thought that if we could offer a diverse array of programs and events, we would be able to create a community of students. However, we are quickly realizing that this may not be the case. What is the problem? A large part of the problem is that many of these programs are just that--a disconnected series and assortment of programs. This will not contribute to creating a satisfying and healthy community of committed individuals.

Just as a teacher must develop short term and long term lesson objectives, I believe that campus ministers should also allow their programs and activities to develop out of some sort of lesson objective. To help us with this process, we might ask ourselves: What is the point of this program? Is it to merely to attract students? Is the program merely a mask which hides an underlying objective of converting students? Or does the program address a legitimate need and does it contribute to creating a stable and healthy campus community? Our answer should indicate whether or not we should sponsor the program.

At the end of a semester or school year, students want to be able to say and feel that as a result of their involvement in a particular club or group, they learned something and they gained something of benefit for their lives. This is not to say that it is wrong to evangelize. But, evangelism by itself is too narrow a goal and does not do much to promote the building of a broad-based community which serves the needs of both the students and the university at large.

If our programs are merely a front for evangelism, students will feel used and deceived, and will probably only continue to avoid religious issues and involvement. If our programs do not speak to their world, and have the objective of building community, we will find fewer and fewer students attending our programs and more and more students looking elsewhere for their spiritual nourishment.

One way to meet this challenge is to develop programs around a consistent theme. Each program or activity could focus on a new aspect of that theme. For instance, one might consider themes such as "Developing a Healthy Life." Each week would then tackle one aspect of this theme in more depth such as: "The Components of a Healthy, Emotional Life," "Social Influences for an Unhealthy Life," etc. Not only would each week focus on a different aspect of the theme, but they could reflect a variety of methods and styles. They might also include bringing in guest speakers, an artistic approach, field trips, group discussions, etc. Students would then be able to participate in the aspects which interest them. As they participate, they would gradually establish relationships and friendships with other like minded students attending these programs, and, as a result of these friendships, they begin to feel that they are a part of a community with a purpose and direction.

This does not preclude offering special programs and events that are not clearly connected to the theme. Often these type of activities provide an interesting diversion. However, the strength of the main program would still be evident and would identify the particular organization and club as a focused, exciting, and dynamic community. The drawback to this kind of ministry is the personal investment involved. It requires one to sit down and take the time to make a plan for the entire term as well as the school year. It requires one to consider profoundly the needs of the students with whom they work and for whom they work. However, in the long run, we believe that this is a far more satisfying approach to campus ministry.

Another means to address this challenge is by providing a vital and fulfilling Sunday service plan. A spiritually rich Sunday service that is designed to feed students and community members alike goes a long way toward building a sense of community. All people--students and professionals alike--look for the opportunity to address the mysteries of god through intentional rituals and worship. It is also healthy for students to be able to worship in a community that is generationally rich and diverse. And, it is healthy for families to worship with the students as well.

How might one create what we would call a student-friendly Sunday worship? Music that is well-chosen is one factor. There are many songbooks that have exciting and inspirational music that is geared for young adults. But, this music is equally stimulating for all age groups. Secondly, again, one should look at their service structure and ask if it has a clear focus and purpose. Third, you may which to consider creating a sermon series based on one theme. In New York, a sermon series was created around the theme: "Stepping Out on the Word of God." The series looked at: Joseph and Reuben, Moses and Joshua, Jesus, religious saints, and a concluding sermon on what this means for each one of us on a daily basis. A fourth component is providing ample time during the service for prayer an personal meditation or quiet time. Just remember that a rich and meaningful Sunday worship time is a vital component of developing and nurturing a community-- especially if it includes students.

Whatever you chose to do for your campus ministry, do not be discouraged if it does not happen overnight. Spiritual work is not for those seeking instant results. It requires time and a certain amount of personal involvement. However, regardless of the time needed to develop a satisfying and healthy campus ministry, it is worth every minute of it!

The Ancestors Rock for Rwanda

Ted O'Grady-New Paltz, NY

On Wednesday night, October 26th, CARP members and friends "Rocked for Rwanda" in the Student Union Building on campus. The benefit concert, sponsored by the SUNY-New Paltz chapter of CARP, raised money for the American Red Cross' International Relief Effort in Rwanda where tribal strife has caused massive famine, disease and death. 200 people rocked to the music of local bands Hector's Nightmare and ?Como Zoo?, and grooved to the melodious tones of feature band, our own Manhattan Center's "The Ancestors" led by Joe Longo & Co.

Despite high production costs, CARP was able to offer several hundred dollars to a very appreciative American Red Cross. Unique to this event was the willing participation and cooperation of UTS students (who helped promote the concert), CARP students on campus, and Manhattan Center professionals (who advertised the concert and provided the incredible sound system and quality entertainment).

The "Rock for Rwanda" benefit concert has had many positive results. A college newspaper reporter upon hearing about CARP's vision for world peace and harmony remarked, "That's the most inspiring thing I've ever heard!" CARP members testified boldly to our True Parents' work and gained a considerable amount of exposure and good will. UTS students have been witnessing on the SUNY-New Paltz campus every week during the fall term and inviting students to campus discussion groups as well as weekend Principle seminars at UTS. Already many students are attending weekly discussion groups regularly, and three students have already attended Principle seminars at UTS with more prepared to attend in the near future. One student, upon hearing the "History of Restoration" lecture burst into tears of repentance for her nation (Japan).

CARP deeply appreciates the sincere and sacrificial efforts of many UTS students and Manhattan Center members who made the event possible. We look forward to great things happening in the near future.

Sunday School: If You Build It...They Will Come

by Vicki Henry-St. Cloud, MN

When we first moved to Minnesota in 1988 there only 6 children-all under 5 years. Since that time (with the influx of Tribal Messiahs) the Minneapolis/St. Paul area has grown to 36 children and 2 more "on the way." Needless to say the necessity for a sound religious education for our community reared its head.

For many years our Sunday School was battered around by various regional leaders' personal opinions of its credibility. Yet, through it all, a few mothers (I among them) persisted in its establishment with much experimentation and necessary flexibility. In Sept. 1993 our Sunday School was made official with the appointment of a principal and 4 lead teachers for age groups pre-K to high school. During that time I was the lead teacher for the K-2 group, but soon found myself developing curriculum and teaching materials for all four groups. At the start of our second formal year, this August I was appointed principal. Now I am still creating curriculum and teaching materials as well as negotiating for space and commitment from the church center and parents. During this entire saga I have accumulated a myriad of "how to" materials for starting a Sunday School. I also found myself flipping through back issues of "The Blessing Quarterly" and "Blessed Family," discovering a wealth of internal guidance on the religious education of our children. After talking to other sisters in various states, I realized the necessity for some kind of guidebook on how to establish a Sunday School, as well as curriculum development.

An interesting side point to all this is that since September 1993 I had felt Linna Rapkins' presence pushing me to do something. It wasn't till this May that I first heard of her passing. For 10 months I had felt her with me. I would wake at 4am or 5am, not able to get back to sleep. Ideas for teaching, making materials and curriculum would just come flooding over me. This is why I feel even more compelled to offer this endeavor.

And so I have now assembled a manual from various sources (inside and outside the Unification Church as well as things we developed in Minnesota) entitled "How to Start a Sunday School." It is a 176-page book covering the topics of: Philosophy, Structure, Environment, Curriculum, Instruction and Discipline, Children's Needs, and Teaching Ideas and Resources. It all comes bound in a 3-ring binder. Also available is a notebook on the internal guidance aspect. There are reprints of articles from "The Blessing Quarterly" and "Blessed Family" as well as True Parents' speeches to Blessed Children.

I am also offering books on beginning Korean language and culture study for children (this with the help of Sung Sook Anderson). They contain reproducible patterns and worksheets. The Korean culture book contains the Korean flag and its meaning, alphabet, numbers 1-10, dress, songs, food and social studies info (including maps). The language book includes the alphabet, numbers 1-10, colors, days of the week, months of the year, seasons and parts of the body. It has patterns for file folder games and puppets as well as worksheets.

All of the profits will go to our Sunday School in Minneapolis. Please make checks and money orders out to Vicki Henry (as I live over an hour from the church center and I am the one who will be printing and sending the manuals). I plan to have more teaching aids, materials and manuals to offer in the future. Such topics as "How to use Creative Dramatics in Religious Education" as well as games to encourage lecturing and learning and more on Divine Principle, True Parents' lives and church traditions are but a few. Manuals

"How to Start a Sunday School" 176pp. 35.00

"Religious Education-Internal Guidance 100pp. 30.00

both for 60.00

"Beginning Korean Language for Children" 20.00

"Beginning Korean Culture for Children" 12.00

both for 30.00

Please add 3.50 per item for postage. Allow 3-4 weeks for delivery.

Checks and money orders payable to: Vicki Henry

Send to: Vicki Henry, 827 - 6th Ave. North, St. Cloud, MN 56303

(All profits go to the Minneapolis Sunday School.)

Vicki Henry has a BA in Art Education, has run a Sunday School for six years, is the mother of three children, and the PTA chairman for two years.