Strong Leadership and the Keys to Managing Change

by Don Sardella-Long Island, NY

Major changes in today's world have pointed to the need for even more effective leadership in our work. The pressure to boost productivity while building successful teams and improving morale is quite a tall order. Yet this is the challenge many leaders face.

In the opinions of well-respected front-runners in the field of leadership development, one must organize his or her responsibilities into manageable segments to provide timely leadership.

We agree. We have isolated four major areas of concern that can be examined separately.

Foresight, or "vision", allows us to begin with a clear picture of the desired goal in mind. It is immediately followed by communication, because early involvement of the team in the exchange of ideas and methods is important in bringing about a speedy and excellent result. Good communication, consisting of an ongoing dialogue of words and pictures, must be employed to persuade others that the core concept is indeed worthwhile. A manager needs others to respond enthusiastically, just as a coach needs motivation on the playing field. With enthusiastic support of all team members, the effort will be sustained and carried out to successful completion.

Communication serves as a conduit for fostering cooperation and consensus. A leader is wise to listen to, and value, each person's contributions and perspective, weaving many ideas into the overall picture. People tend to support that project to which they have contributed, so it is important for every member to feel he or she has added to the overall picture. Morale has been shown to improve when workers feel their input is appreciated and heeded.

Personal organization is necessary to monitor your activities and use your efforts and time most effectively in order to maintain control. Lining up priorities should be uppermost in mind.

Prioritization or time management is a planned approach to the job or project based on an examination of present habits and desired results. It hinges on persistent setting and achieving of small goals throughout a workday. Rather than becoming a victim of haphazard circumstances that make claim on your time, small, manageable goals allow one to feel the satisfaction of observable accomplishment.

This holds true for the goals you set for yourself and team members as well. It is much easier to approach a manageable task and when completed, it contributes to a feeling of competence and meaningful personal productivity.

Implementation of the "vision" is the next step. The essence of true leadership is achieved through allowing others the responsibility to be self-directed. Effective delegation on the part of the manager increases the self-confidence and potential of every team member.

The most powerful leaders in any organization are those who delegate; who surround themselves with competent people and then encourage those people to contribute. Charging team members with a share of the responsibility sets the groundwork for allowing them to feel deserving of a portion of the credit and personal satisfaction for a job well done.

These are the basic steps a leader may take to become more effective. Most managers would like to be able to describe themselves as respected, goal-driven and influential...a powerful motivator...a strong communicator. These are traits we believe can be developed through hard work and proper training.

The pace of change with which we all are confronted makes team effort critical. It is therefore advisable to keep in mind the basic tools we have mentioned: foresight, communication, personal organization and implementation. When these are put into practice, you will enjoy the immediate rewards of increased productivity, and long-lasting benefits of team cooperation. Challenges can thus be viewed as opportunities when one possesses the tools with which to achieve his or her goals.

Social Service Projects of World CARP-Chicago

by Robert Kittel-Chicago, IL

CARP has sponsored a variety of presentations dealing with such current topics as AIDS, family breakdown, racism, and religious harmony. But more important than the exchange of ideas is the social service projects CARP has initiated here in the windy city.

We first went to the Student Development Services to obtain a list of community organizations that had solicited the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) for student volunteers. These organizations wanted to offer students a chance to participate in local social service programs. The university is energetically promoting student involvement in such programs and, at the end of the academic year, will be giving certificates to students who volunteer their time and talent in social service.

The advantages of working through the university to find local service projects are tremendous. First, CARP is seen from the perspective of university administrators as a socially conscious and publicly active student organization. On this foundation good relationship naturally develops with the university. We are no longer a cult living outside society, but involved in neighborhood development, helping to solve real social problems. Then during introductory CARP lectures we insert slides showing our participation in community service programs; this is the first line of our public relations defense.

Last week, for example, we went to the student newspaper, The Chicago Flame, to protest a negative article labeling CARP members, "Moonies," and referring to us as a cult. We told the editors about our involvement with the Franciscan Outreach Center and it helped very much in creating a positive image; CARP was seen as a viable, socially active student organization. The editors said they would print an apology and this week ran Bruce Sutchar's letter explaining our grievances. (Bruce is the Campus Minister for UIC.)

The majority of social service programs are organized by religious groups, especially Christians. So in the future, these relations can also be cultivated, possibly for the church side.

When new students come to the center we explain that being part of CARP will bring a great benefit for their future. After graduating, the next concern of students is for employment. Most job interviews are secured through resume applications. So when a student writes not only his or her academic qualifications, but also writes about their involvement with social service projects, it looks real good on paper! Not only are they more likely to get an interview, but when they talk of personal experiences at different projects it creates a positive image in the minds of their future employers.

More and more business are not just looking for smart employees, but good employees. A person who has been working in community development projects on a volunteer basis would certainly be evaluated as a good person. Why? Because this person has demonstrated a care for others, willing to make personal sacrifices that help those less fortunate.

Another advantage to social service projects is the bonding that takes place between spiritual parent and child. Standing behind a table serving soup to the homeless builds a much deeper relationship than just sitting through a lecture. Lectures are essential, but deep friendships makes it easier to bring people to lectures and workshops.

Working with existing service projects is the best; it does not cost anything to set up, we don't need to spend time in organizing and running the program, and we don't have to have specialized expertise. All we have to do is show up and help. We have found that students really like this and come back again and again. Our guests can see that we not only talk about high ideals, we are firmly grounded in the real world too. (If we only talk about the international service projects, it might send wrong signals, causing someone to think, "If I join this group, I can be a world traveler.")

Various projects that we have participated in include:

1. Chicago Christian Industrial League: This was a food service project. We were mainly preparing food and because it was not involved with actually serving people we stopped going to this program. However, our relationship with them lasted. They just called us asking if they could use the CARP center as a collection depot for Thanksgiving food donations.

2. Habitat for Humanity: We discontinued working here because it was a Saturday project and conflicted with weekend workshops. This program involved demolition and/or restoration of homes, preparing them for low-income housing.

3. Franciscan Outreach Center: This program operates 7 days a week. The Franciscans have a big kitchen and dining area in their church compound. They receive donations of food and prepare the meals on the premises, but we don't have to get involved with food preparations. All we do is help them service dinner to the homeless once a week, on Tuesdays from 4:30-7:00 pm.

4. City Lands: This is an after school program for inner-city children whose parent or guardians work full-time jobs. Instead of becoming latch-key kids, children remain at school and volunteers come to school to play games with children or help them with homework. This has been a very rewarding experience.

In conclusion, service projects are an excellent way to build good relationships; between guests and CARP members as well as building self esteem for everyone (the relationship of mind-body unity). However, if we tried to setup, organize and operate the service projects all by ourselves, it would consume our time, personnel and financial resources. Working with existing programs lets us reap the benefits of community service, while still allowing us time to do other CARP activities.

Send the Quinns to Rev. Ahn

Dear Editor;

Send the Quinns to Rev. Ahn's 40-day, I say. Who can forget his classic explanation of masculinity and femininity? He maintains that masculinity and femininity exist only in the family, and subject and object exist in all other relationships. He cites the example of Margaret Thatcher, former prime minister of Britain. By day, she is subject to her nation, ruling Britain-at night, she is the feminine object of her husband, bringing him tea on a platter.

If Margaret Thatcher had children in daycare, would they be the loveless, forlorn victims of societal decay that the Quinns describe? I don't think so! They would feel loved, bursting with pride, filled with confidence, sure that the world was theirs for the taking.

Letters to the editor have already addressed aspects of the Quinns' interpretation of the Principle and Father's words. I would like to respond from the pragmatic angle of a working mother. I have just one question for the Quinns: HELLO??

I can only conclude that:

* The Quinns are independently wealthy * Jon Quinn has a thriving law or medical practice * They are Amish, Mennonite or Pennsylvania Dutch * They're childless

As for the vast number of families which require two incomes to make ends meet, things are not as clear as the cut paper doll chain reality the Quinns describe.

"Many children are parentless while stuck in daycare."

Excuse me?!?

The breakdown of the family refers to the destruction of the relationship of love between family members-not their physical arrangement. A career mother, who passionately loves her husband and children, who drops her kids off for the day with an affectionate caregiver in a stimulating play environment, is contributing to the "disintegration of the family and nation"? Please!

* Fulltime, at-home mothers with several children often provide less direct attention, structured educational play and fun peer interaction than a quality daycare program

* Dr. T. Berry Brazelton, renowned pediatrician who urges mothers to stay home when they can, recommends that toddlers of at-home mothers enter daycare at least part-time for growth and developmental reasons

* Often children relish their daycare, look forward to meeting their little playmates, and protest when it's time to leave

Working, engaged, career-, mission- or accomplishment-oriented women are not the driving force in the destruction of family values. I'm offended by the recommendations and sensibilities of the Quinns, and even more surprised to see them in print.

Martha Sandino, San Francisco, California

School Choice for Inner-City Kids

by Timothy P. Ehrgott-Indianapolis IN

There is a report that the U.S. postmaster general responded to a call for privatizing the postal service by mailing a stern rebuttal to the offending group's headquarters, a block away in Washington DC. The letter arrived eleven days later. We face a similar irony in education. "A Nation at Risk," a much-cited 1983 report, called for major reform in the way our country educates its children. Eleven years later, the public education establishment has yet to deliver.

In August 1991, a private group in Indianapolis, Indiana, decided to address the education problem by focusing on low-income students trapped in the government-run, inner-city schools. This effort, now emulated in ten other American communities, offers a challenge to those who have put their faith in routine reform efforts around the country.

The Indianapolis program is a voucher system free of government interference, devoid of bureaucracy, and virtually bereft of rules. It's the Educational CHOICE Charitable Trust of the Golden Rule Insurance Company. It pays one-half a student's tuition, up to $800, to any legally operating school of the family's choice in Marion County. The program is open to any student who qualifies for the federal reduced-price lunch program and who resides within the Indianapolis Public Schools district. CHOICE makes no judgments on curriculum or academics. If a child is good enough for the school and the school for the family, CHOICE cuts a check to the school each month on behalf of the student. End of our involvement.

No Tinkering at the Edges

As a business, Golden Rule has a natural interest in improving the quality of education in its community. The company had received several suggestions for action in the education field, including an offer to endow a chair at the alma mater of its chairman, J. Patrick Rooney. And there were plenty of other reform options open to companies: adopt-a-school, legislative reform, donations of computers, teacher awards. However, none of these routes addresses the systemic problems at the core of our education dilemma. Spending resources on tinkering at the edges did not appeal to Pat Rooney and Golden Rule.

Instead, the company looked for a way to confront the system by using something every business faces every day: competition. The educational system would not dramatically alter its operations if Golden Rule had "adopted" a school. But it might if confronted with a loss of its clients!

Many parents in the Indianapolis area already enjoyed school choice. The growth of the surrounding suburban school systems meant that those with the financial means could select one school over another-by moving into its area. Those without the ability to move were left behind in the central city with its declining test scores and rising violence.

That struck Golden Rule as inherently unfair, with young people's futures being decided by accident of birth. The way to rectify the situation was to give the left-behind families the means to exercise options beyond their reach. Once they could walk away from their schools, then perhaps the system would listen to them.

There is evidence that CHOICE is having an effect. Two months after it started, the city school district announced its intention to develop a limited choice plan of its own, called Select Schools. It was adopted in the fall of 1993, to mixed reviews, but it means parents do enjoy a bit more freedom in deciding their children's futures.

Competition works, and it leads to good things. It works so well that ten days after CHOICE announced the availability of 500 grants, 750 students were signed up. In spring 1994, the third year of operation, 1,100 children were enrolled, and more than 800 students were on the waiting list. In addition to the students in Indianapolis, CHOICE- style programs have sprung up in other communities across the country, including a $2.4 million program beginning next fall in Los Angeles.

Trusting Parents

Opponents of school choice have questioned parents' commitment, whether they are "qualified" (i.e., smart enough) to make choices, and if they even care. What we have found through CHOICE is that poor families want the same things for their children as other parents: a good education and a promising future.

The families have been telling us at CHOICE how important it is to have two factors present in a school. Values are the first point. The families want to know that what they are teaching the children at home is being reinforced by the school. And, sadly, safety is the second factor. Many of the CHOICE parents did not feel their children were safe in their previous schools. Now they believe they are.

Perhaps the parents understand education better than most of the experts. Without values and without a safe environment, good education cannot occur.

Mr. Ehrgott is Executive Director of the Educational CHOICE Charitable Trust, located at 7440 Woodland Drive, Indianapolis, Indiana 46278. This column appears in the October 1994 issue of The Freeman, the monthly journal of The Foundation for Economic Education, 30 South Broadway, Irvington-on-Hudson, New York 10533. Copyright 1994.

Satan's Strategy

by Antonio Betancourt-Washington, DC

The following brief report was compiled by William Selig from notes from a sermon given by Antonio Betancourt at the Washington, D.C. Church on Sept. 24, 1994.

The strategy of Satan was to destroy Father's foundation because if Father's foundation could be destroyed, there would be no way that America could fulfill her responsibilities regarding God's headache of international communism.

In 1976, after the Washington Monument victory, Satan's strategy was to completely discredit Father; to bring him to the level in which he had to negotiate with America, with the options of leaving America and staying in Korea, or staying here and facing jail, persecution and character assassination.

God helped in a very interesting way. As Father was being persecuted in the United States, God was developing a parallel strategy in Latin America. In God's eyes, the Americas are one. The discovery of America was not the discovery of just North America or the Caribbean, but the discovery of the entire hemisphere. For God, north, central and south are one America.

The providence moved south. Father's whole strategy was to protect America and allow the United States to confront international communism by developing a foundation that would challenge Moscow. The whole strategy in Latin America had the aim of supporting Father's providence on the American frontline as a whole.

This strategy was accomplished. Father was very successful in Latin America in the early 1980s. Later on we began active education in the U.S. concerning the origins, nature and errors of communism, contrasting it with the God-centered worldview embodied in the American Constitution and vision of this nation's founders. Through many avenues Father inspired and guided brothers and sisters to undertake projects to educate the American people as to the ways in which communism was working in this nation, and how to combat it not in a negative way, but rather by exalting the God-centered ideals which this nation has always represented.

Eventually, we were able to support the United States in its confrontation with international communism. Father's victories in America brought as a consequence a new American leadership that was able to force the Soviet Union itself to raise up another kind of leadership, one which could negotiate with America in the best interest of both countries and for the advancement of world peace.

For years following Washington Monument, we heard Father speak about the "March on Moscow". The interesting thing is that we were thinking it would be a traditional march. But here it was, April 11, 1990, and the march on Moscow was taking place but there was no march in the dictionary sense of the word. Yet, Father marched, with about 40 former heads of state and government, into the Kremlin for the historical visit and embrace with then-President Mikhail Gorbachev.

After that historic reconciliation, a man of God embracing the leader of an atheistic regime, Father gave the direction to go into mainland China and Pyongyang, North Korea. We began a diplomatic offensive in China which led to a great deal of interaction with the highest levels of leadership there. This created the necessary clout and psychological impact to make the people in North Korea take Father and his vision seriously.

At that time, Father directed me to visit the embassy of any country that had relations with North Korea and introduce his ideals and our many activities, including the Summit Council for World Peace, of which I am Executive Director. Pursuing this responsibility, I was kicked out of many embassies. One was the North Korean embassy in Beijing.

After I introduced Father, they started accusing me. "We thought you were just a Colombian and you were heading this international organization (i.e., the Summit Council)," they ranted, "We never thought that you were an agent of that fascist Moon."

They went on to demand, "If Moon is serious to engage with our country, first of all he has to repent publicly. He has to apologize for the pain that he has caused our leader and our country for the last 40 years."

In my briefcase, I carried many photographs of Father and Dr. Bo Hi Pak with top leaders in Beijing and Moscow: Father with Gorbachev and Dr. Pak with Li Peng and other senior leadership in China. I said, "Look, Rev. Moon and the Unification Church were the enemies of Moscow and Beijing. Neither of them asked for repentance in order to engage in dialogue, and look at these pictures. Why should he repent to your country? Besides, if you ask the repentance of Rev. Moon, you have to repent for the things that you have done to our activities and to Rev. Moon. In 1987 you sent a task force of terrorists to kill him, which was uncovered by the FBI and Rev. Moon was told that you were after him."

The ambassador went completely crazy, and screamed, "Get out, out of my embassy!" Anyway, it's a very long history which changed the atmosphere to the point at which several of us were able to enter Pyongyang in April 1991, one year after the victory in Moscow. We were able to convince the North Koreans that Rev. Moon was indeed their friend and that Rev. Moon had initiated together with the entire Unification Movement a process of healing and reconciliation towards the DPRK (North Korea) and that we could be their best friend and help them to connect with the whole world.

It was very, very difficult, but we were able to engage them. On Nov. 30, 1991 an invitation was extended to Father and Mother to enter North Korea. On December 6th, they had their first encounter with Kim Il Sung, in Hungnam, the place from which Father had departed the north in 1950. At that time, forty years earlier, Father had departed from Hungnam concentration camp as a broken man, a man without a place in the world. The key advisors to Kim Il-sung advised him not to receive Rev. Moon in the place where he departed because they knew the psychological meaning of this. Yet Kim Il Sung decided to meet Rev. Moon in Hungnam he where had built a beautiful palace.

Father was able to encourage the North Korean leadership to have a more positive outlook on relations with South Korea, Japan and the West. We like to think that this has contributed toward the gradually improving relations in that part of the world, and is a spiritual support to the U.S. efforts to bring peace and stability in the region.

Through this process, Father is becoming more trusted by the leadership in the North, giving them moral support, vision and clarity, in order to help fulfill their most important goal - to establish direct dialogue and settle their relations with the most consequential country in the world - the United States of America.

Our overall vision, on the practical level, can be summarized in the ideal of world peace and harmony, based upon trust, friendship and cooperation beyond race, nation, culture and ideology. Truly Father is bringing religious ideals--in particular those of Christianity--into effective action for peace.

Father's role is to serve as the peacemaker and harmonizer, ultimately to bring North and South Korea together. We are involved in that process. Father gave us five points, and it's important to understand these five points when people ask what is Rev. Moon doing in North Korea and why is the religious leader of the Unification Church involved in North Korea.

War is not an option. We have to avoid war at any cost because the next war, according to Father, will be to the death, a gladiator's war. That is not an option. It must be avoided at all costs. We have to mobilize all the resources within and outside the Unification Church to prevent war.

The peninsula must be free of nuclear weapons. Therefore, the nuclear weapons problem of North Korea must be resolved. In order to achieve number one and number two, we have to win their trust because they haven't trusted anyone. Father is the first person, and ours is the first religious body, that they have trusted in the last 40 years. But the trust that we have built with them is not for our own sake, it is for South Korea, for the United States, and for the whole world, for the resolution of this problem.

Reunion of separated families. A database must be created that identifies where these families are in the north and in the south. We can begin with a small group, one family, two families, three families, and start to bring them together.

Prosperity must be brought to North Korea. We have to help restructure the economy of that country. As they prosper and achieve financial independence as individuals, next they will want security to protect their new prosperity. Naturally political reforms will be demanded by the public.

Preparation for unification. Eventually North and South Korea must unify. This is in accordance with God's will and the flow of history. But unification must be accomplished with the least amount of pain - human and financial.

These five points are the motivation and purpose behind our Council's work in Korea. We can proclaim it anywhere because they are perfectly sound and noble. Some parties resent it because they are jealous or frustrated, and because they have 40 years of struggle with the North's ugly history, and because of the memories of the more than two million killed in the Korean War. But for God's overall hope to be fulfilled, these criticisms must be put aside. From a religious perspective, we have to be able to forgive and to love.

The victory of the Summit Council is not my victory or Dr. Pak's victory. It is the victory of God and True Parents, together with all people who have been suffering for righteousness. We pay collective indemnity, which we can call salvific energy. Salvific energy is created, then Father uses it to accomplish the will of heaven.

Our relationship with North Korea is strong, but we are not agents of juche ideology. We are agents of heaven and our goal is the final resolution of this problem so that we can have peace in the peninsula and so that God's providence may be achieved without bloodshed and without economic losses.

Thank you for your prayers and your support.

Antonio Betancourt, Executive Director of the Summit Council for World Peace, assisted Dr. Pak as an emissary that arranged True Parents' hometown visit in November- December 1991, as well as many of the subsequent high-level visits to Pyongyang. Mr. Betancourt was virtually the only non-Korean present at the funeral of Kim Il Sung.

Reevaluating Subject, Object and You

by Cheryl Roth-Orlando, FL

We understand through studying the Principle that subject means initiative and object means responsive, and there is a reciprocal relationship. But what do you really believe? What evidence is there in your life to show that you understand the value of subject and object?

Historically there has been a lot of misunderstanding and pain centered on this point. Since the fall of man, humans were left with an incomplete and immature understanding of the ultimate subject/object relationship, which is God and His whole creation. Therefore, all of our relationships have been based on misunderstanding. This has widespread and deep implications.

Part of the problem has to do with our understanding and application of words. In this article I want to focus on the value of primary and secondary, vertical and horizontal. Sometimes we have associated words improperly, and sometimes we simply have a post-fall understanding rather than knowing God's original heart.

What does primary and secondary mean? We often associate numbers with values. "You are number one" means that you are the best or most important. Winning first prize is the highest honor in a contest. Many of us make this kind of association between subject and object; however, this is a very wrong concept. There are often times when "first" does not mean "better" or "best" or "more important."

Let's think of another application of these words, such as in primary school and secondary school. Here "primary" means basic and fundamental. "Secondary" means more advanced, more developed.

Think about it for a moment in relation to God and the whole cosmos. God contains the fundamental, basic, primary components of subject/object, internal/external, masculine/feminine, completely harmonized within Himself. Father said that God created to complete Himself. So He created the spiritual world and the physical world in all its vast array and complexity, giving it the potential to multiply and develop endlessly. Every generation of sons and daughters has the potential to be greater than the one before. Father has told us that God desires for His children to be even better than Himself. So "object"-in the secondary position-can mean "more advanced, more developed"!

We have to change our concepts. We are influenced-conditioned-by our fallen ancestry and history. Even the greatest religions until now- even the Unification Church-could not completely separate from the fallen mind, which does not know the original ideal.

We were pushed to believe that horizontal was bad and vertical was good. This kind of thinking might have seemed useful to reverse the fall because we were immature. Now that we are in the Completed Testament Age, we can understand that humans are the divine horizontal manifestation and multiplication of the divine vertical Being.

Christianity didn't fulfill as the bride of the Messiah, so its internal growth was stunted. The Unification Church was created to fulfill the uncompleted mission of Christianity, and Father has painstakingly been trying to raise up to understand the true value of the object position. However, some of what is necessary during the course of restoration is different from what we need to establish in the Kingdom of Heaven. Now that Mother has totally restored the true object position, we can all come to understand our value more deeply. Father said man is subject because man contains the seed of life. What is man going to do with that seed by himself? Nothing-no fulfillment. God created woman to complete man in the same way He created everything to complete Himself. Subject and object are attracted to each other for the purpose of existence, development and multiplication. Regardless what position you started in, once a relationship is established, the positions will constantly be exchanged. Only when one position is less mature does the other have to constantly give and sacrifice more.

Man is not whole without woman-woman is not whole without man. God is not whole without His creation. Each part contains the balancing components the other needs to fulfill itself. Everything is meant to be part of one organic whole with God as the central heartbeat and motivator. how much do we act like we are part of the body of God?

The first relationships began in a state of separation from knowing the true value of subject and object. We were born and matured through the ideology of separation. Now we must reeducate ourselves with the ideology of wholeness.

God, like man, has the seed: the ideal filled with energy and motivation to fulfill its potential. His creation, like woman, has the womb and the egg to complete, nurture and develop the potential to its fulfillment. The result of the give and take between God and His object (the cosmos) is the creation of a new being with unlimited potential-the Kingdom of Heaven. The development of goodness, beauty, love and joy is endless.

If you feel your object is less important or less valuable than yourself, you have limited the potential love, goodness and joy that can be multiplied in your relationship. If you treat your body as though it has less value than your mind, it may rebel and make difficulty for your mind to fulfill its potential. If you treat your children as though they have less value than yourself, they will have self-esteem problems and difficulty to experience the love of God.

If you have loving parents who sacrifice themselves for you, and you become smarter, richer and more powerful than they, will you forget them? No matter how great you become, you would feel it was because of them; all your potential came from them and their love. They would always hold the most special place in your heart; and they would feel so much more joy and pride because you became smarter, richer and more powerful than they.

Father has sometimes said that women are closer to God because they were created as objective beings-and therefore they can understand the value of the object position more easily than men. Why does Father often criticize American women for being too subjective? Because Father wants them to learn how much power and influence they have from the object position. He wants them to find their true value. In the past century, women have been trying to focus their value on their subjective character traits, because there has been no true model or understanding of the object's value.

Why do you think Father has been pushing Mother so hard these past few years? Do you think he might want Mother to be as great as or even greater than himself? I think Father knows his own value; therefore, he would not feel insecure if Mother or the children went on to accomplish something more than himself. Man can be secure in his position as subject to woman only when he understands his value as an object of God, thereby understanding the true value of man's object: woman. Each of us contains many subject and object attributes in our character beyond being just man and woman. Some men are soft and gentle by nature and some women are naturally strong and aggressive. If men would give value to the feminine aspects of their own character, it would free them of a lot of false ideas and help them love their wives more. Both men and women must find themselves first as a child of God and be free to express that through their many subject and object attributes.

Regardless of whether you are a man or a woman, you are a subjective being in that you were created as an individual truth body. The triple objective purpose is that as subject of your own realm, you make God your first object, your spouse your second object, and your descendants your third object. Objects of love. Subject is the initiator of true love.

The subject position has its unique value. The object position has its unique value. Each is different but one can not exist without the other; therefore, their value is equal. Only through understanding our incredible value as an object of God, and our incredible value as a subjective being in our own realm can we really fulfill our true potential.

We have to understand subject and object as complementary rather than greater and lesser in order to love God fully and love each other fully. This kind of thinking does not devalue God, the Messiah or men; it only liberates us all to fulfill our greatest potential together. There are many spiritual people who understand some of this already without having studied the Principle. We must open our hearts and minds to see and live the original ideal of God. The Completed Testament Age is the time to establish the ideal.

Pursuing a Doctorate in a Busy Life

by Josie L. Hauer-Bridgeport, CT

How can busy parents prepare for the future in the midst of changing diapers, cooking dinner, working 9-5, budgeting, praying, and caring for our families and neighbors? Although most of us realize that continuing professional education is essential for greater effectiveness in the coming century, it is no doubt a great challenge.

I am a mother of two children under two years of age, working full- time, and I am determined to finish a doctoral program before the next century. The Doctoral Program in Educational Management at the University of Bridgeport (UB) is a flexible advanced-degree program designed for the working professional. I have been enrolled in this program for one year and am very pleased with the quality of instruction and students. My classmates include teachers, lawyers, administrators, health-care professionals and a jazz musician, all preparing to successfully manage educational or non-profit organizations. It is offered on a part-time basis at UB campus-each semester class meets for one evening per week, and there is also an interdisciplinary seminar which meets six Fridays and Saturdays per years and for two full weeks during the summer.

Classes carry six hours of academic credit and include such topics as legal issues in education; human relations and communications; international education; policy development; quantitative analysis and statistics, and others. The program requires a minimum of four years for completion (sooner if taken full-time), including three years of formal study and a minimum of one year for completion of dissertation. The emphasis of this program is professional and practical but it is flexible enough for students to integrate their personal interests. My academic background is in philosophy and theology, but through working on various projects within the movement (CARP, campus ministry, businesses, etc.), I was involved in human relations and management issues. After teaching for a while in public high school as a social studies teacher, I realized how important administrators were to the healthy functioning of an educational institution. I felt that God was pushing me to prepare for educational leadership.

I have watched many of my friends pursue Ph.D. programs in philosophy or theology which require a total focus of time and energy. Although I admire and respect their diligence and suffering, I realized after the birth of our first baby that I wanted a more flexible doctoral program, and I found this at UB. When do I have time to study? Usually after 9pm, when the delightful noise of children has died down. For those who want to maintain a busy life and pursue a doctorate, I highly recommend this program. University of Bridgeport has other graduate programs structured for the working professional as well: weekend graduate programs include an MBA program, and a Masters in Nutrition or Human Resource Development. Other graduate programs include Masters in counseling, education, business, engineering, computer science, and mathematics, as well as a doctorate in Chiropractic. If you are interested in these or other educational opportunities at the University of Bridgeport, please call or write to me at:

Josie Hauer
Office of Admissions
126 Park Ave.
Bridgeport, CT 06601
phone: (203) 576-4558
fax: (203) 576-4672