Miracles and Tribulations at the Turn of the Age: Where we are Situated in World History

By Dr. Andrew Wilson-NYC

The passings of President Richard Nixon and First Lady Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis remind us of the unprecedented speed at which the world is changing in this last decade before the millennium. World events have toppled old institutions, caused nations to vanish and maps to be redrawn. President George Bush proudly proclaimed a "New World Order," yet the world is convulsing in disorder from Bosnia to Rwanda. How is one to interpret these onrushing changes? What do they have to do with the dawning of the millennium and the Completed Testament Age?

On the one hand, we have witnessed miracles. Communism is dead. The Soviet Union is no more. The threat of nuclear holocaust has vanished. People all over the world have been liberated from the heavy hand of Communism and superpower rivalry. In China, the largest nation of the world, Communism is giving way to a vibrant capitalist economy. These miracles continue today with the ending of apartheid in South Africa and the dawning of peace between Israel and the Palestinans. In events such as these many have detected the hand of God's providence.

On the other hand, in the last few years we have seen warfare and slaughter running rampant in the Balkans, Somalia and Rwanda, and conflicts smoldering in Armenia, Georgia, Sri Lanka, Kashmir, Cambodia, and Mexico. Intercommunal violence flares in India and Los Angeles. Terrorists bomb New York City.

In the face of these challenges to peace and order, we look in vain for leaders. The United Nations, formerly bolstered by hopes that with the end of the Cold War it could take a major role as a peacemaking organization, has seen its prestige badly tarnished by its mishandling of Somalia and Bosnia. National governments fare little better, with exceptionally weak and uncertain leadership in the United States, Japan, Great Britain, and Russia.

We would have expected the United States, as the only remaining superpower, to exercise leadership, but instead we have seen it humiliated by petty tyrants in Somalia and Haiti. In dealing with China and Japan it has enunciated positions founded on allegedly high principle, only to back down in the face of each determined adversary. President Clinton seems to be operating out of political expediency and crisis management rather than from any sense of purpose of vision about what the United States' vital interests ought to be. Lacking any direction, he has in effect abandoned the United States' leadership role in international affairs to the UN, allowing the UN even to determine its foreign policy in Somalia and Bosnia.

Meanwhile, there is a growing sense of despair over urban decay, rising crime, and racism that has infected American domestic life. Government corruption and scandal is rampant in an administration that pledged itself to ethical reform. The media, which promotes sex and violence and is habitually slanted towards a liberal and secular ethic, is becoming widely mistrusted. Yet traditional religion is in retreat, and the country is plunging downward towards becoming, in the words of a well-known radio commentator, "a third-world nation."

One can easily sink into despair about the future, but it is important to remember the miraculous gains that have greeted our world over the last few years. For billions of people, the situation today is immeasurably better than even five years ago. How then can we understand these two simultaneous trends? The key to discerning the present trend of history is to recognize today as the passing of the New Testament Age and the beginning of the Completed Testament Age. These ages do not cease and begin in a flash; they rather wane and rise slowly, like the passing of the seasons. Certain events in the world are part of the old age's passing, while other events occur within the providence of the new age. Understanding this distinction can put world events into proper perspective.

Miracles at the Close of the Age

The New Testament Age concludes when the brothers Cain and Abel unite to make a foundation for the True Parents. According to Hak Jan Han in her speech, "True Parents and the Completed Testament Age," there have been two attempts to make this foundation: first at the end of World War II with the defeat of Nazi Germany and imperial Japan, and second with the end of the Cold War and the defeat of Communism. These two events were guided by the hand of God's providence to consummate the New Testament Age.

Clearly the events surrounding the end of the Cold War were especially miraculous, and can be understood as providential. The foundation of indemnity paid by Christianity and the True Parents could be reaped, and the victory of freedom assured. They marked the completion of the New Testament Age. But in addition, the miraculous end of apartheid in South Africa and the Israeli-Palestinian peace accords should be accounted as part of this New Testament Age providence.

We should understand that the World Wars of this century were at their heart a judgment against the ideological perversions of the West that had to be removed in order to prepare for God's ideal of world peace. The First World War had to do with ending the pretensions of monarchy. It set up the democratic ideal as the only legitimate basis for government. Even the Soviet Union in 1917 proclaimed itself a "democratic republic" and its leaders claimed to be doing the will of the people.

The Second World War was about ending the pretension of racism. Nazi Germany and Japan each had pretensions of racial superiority, with which they justified world conquest, the genocide of the Jews, and war crimes against the Koreans and Chinese. The Allied victory was a victory for the Christian ideal that all peoples and nations have equal rights, as a result of the equality of all people before God. This principle applied to the winners as well as the losers. Its inexorable logic compelled them eventually to abandon their colonies which they had held by virtue of the racist idea of "white man's burden." By the mid 1960s, all African and Asian states were independent. Thus the principles established by the victory of the Allied Powers took time to bear full fruit.

In this analysis, the end of apartheid in South Africa is just the delayed demise of a racist ideology whose doom was sealed before it even began, by the triumph of the Christian democracies in World War II. Perhaps apartheid was able to linger for over 40 years because the Allies failed to receive the Lord of the Second Advent in 1945 and the providence that would have ended the New Testament Age was delayed for 40 years. (Practically speaking, the ANC's pro-Communist orientation gave the proponents of apartheid a certain legitimacy which helped their regime to linger.) But finally, with the installation of the True Parents, all the unpaid accounts of the New Testament Age had to be paid off, the insult of apartheid among them.

Is there any historical significance to the year 1948, three years after the Christians' failure to receive the Lord? 1948 was the year when apartheid was instituted in South Africa. 1948 was the year when the hopes surrounding the end of World War II went sour. The Berlin Blockade and the fall of China to Communism marked the clear beginning of Cold War hostilities. Furthermore, Great Britain, which was supposed to play the role of the Eve nation if Christianity had welcomed the Lord, suddenly lost its world empire, spilling much blood in the process. Great Britain left India, leaving millions to perish in the Hindu-Muslim conflicts that accompanied the partition of that country into Indian and Pakistan. Great Britain lost power in South Africa, leading to the Afrikaner-based apartheid regime. And Great Britain left the Middle East, leaving Jews and Arabs to struggle in a war which resulted in the birth of Israel and the beginning of decades of Arab-Jewish hostilities.

Let us consider, then, that since the Mideast conflict had its genesis in 1948 and the worldwide disorder consequent to Christianity's failure to receive the Lord, its persistence over the last 40-some years may be another phenomena of the wilderness course. Like apartheid, its resolution is another of the unfinished tasks accompanying the end of the New Testament Age.

The heavenly destiny of the Jewish people was to be liberated from 2000 years of suffering and anti-Semitism and to stand as a free people under God's blessing. From that place at the end of World War II, they could have welcomed the Lord. (There were great messianic hopes in Israel in those days.) Despite that providence, Israel has had to suffer in the shadow of Arab hostilities during the very time that the Lord of the Second Advent was walking his wilderness course. Just as on the world-wide level, humanity had to suffer through a new Cain-Abel conflict in the Cold War, so the Jews suffered their own parallel Cain-Abel conflict on the national level in the form of the Palestinian conflict.

According to the Principle, in preparation to meeting the Lord the Jews should first resolve their quarrel with the Palestinians. They should take care to solve their national level Cain-Abel conflict just as the world-wide Cain-Abel conflict between the communist and democratic worlds has been resolved. The providence at close of the New Testament Age thus offers a time of great hope, when Israel's suffering should come to an end.

What is the import of the defeat of Communism and the end of what the Principle calls "World War III"? What false ideal has been newly exposed, analogous to the downfall of racism at the end of World War II? For the Reverend Moon, the chief offense of Communism was its proclamation that humans could realize an ideal society apart from God. Its denial of God was the root of its denial of human rights and all other crimes. We might expect that an analogous error in the victorious nations of the West might also need to be uncovered and expunged. Possibly this error is the ideal of secularism, which holds that modern political society functions best when religious questions are denied and relegated to the private sphere. Secularism arose as an answer to religious conflict in 17th and 18th century Europe, and it has held the high ground as the only universal ideal that could harmonize the profusion of contending religious sects, Protestant and Catholic. Like Communism, it claimed to be a truly internationalist ideal. It fed upon the failure of Christians to practice the universal love proclaimed by their Founder.

Secularism has been tried in the West, with the result that we are beset by moral confusion and antisocial behavior. Thought the secularists confidently expected religion to fade away, it has not. Secularism does not fit with the human need for fundamental spiritual values. Therefore, many people cry out for a revival of religion, but do not see from whence it will come. Evangelicalism and Fundamentalism have flared briefly, but without any lasting impact. Even where their revivals are substantial, they do not make progress to surmount the problem of religious conflict, which has always tarnished religion in the past. This brings us to the dawn of the Completed Testament Age. Tribulations at the Dawn of the New Age

One remarkable feature of the present confusion in so much of world affairs is a lack of guiding ideology. In contrast to the end of apartheid and downfall of Communism, which were laudable goals that could be agreed upon by thoughtful people, there seems to be no clear solution to many of the recent ills that have overtaken our world. Policy-makers throw up their hands over situations like Bosnia or Haiti, where forceful intervention could lead to a quagmire with little prospect for a successful exit. Likewise, the problems of our inner cities defy solution. Crime bills and gun control legislation smack more of posturing and feel-good politics than sober plans that would offer substantial solutions to the problem of crime.

This lack of vision is accompanied by the decline of the very institutions which were supposed to provide it, notably the United Nations, the mainline Christian churches, civil rights organizations, the media, and the universities. They are infected by ideology, beset by indecision, riven by schism, or corrupted by narrow self-interest. None can generate the widespread moral support and sacrificial action that could generate genuine reforms.

Indeed, these are marks of a leaderless time, when the true leader who is arising to lead history is still hidden from most of the world. We know in faith that the dawn of the Completed Testament Age is a time of confusion because the entire mantle of leadership has already been transferred to the Lord of the Second Advent. But the established institutions are yet to recognize the fact. They stubbornly continue to carry on according to the canons of the New Testament Age, which no longer work.

For example, American society is ill-served by two competing ideologies, neither which is sufficient to solving the problems of racial and ethnic division. It is being rent asunder by a "culture war" between these two competing views. One is the traditional Christian ideal that emphasizes a common morality and urges all ethnic groups to conform to the standards of American (i.e. White Anglo-Saxon Christian) culture. The other is the secular vision of multiculturalism, which encourages the diversity of each ethnic group; America being an amalgam of distinct groups living in a "rainbow" of cultures.

The Christian ideal defends traditional morality and teaches human responsibility. But the weakness of the Christian ideal is that it offends and denigrates non-Whites and non-Christians. To the extent that it ignores their cultures and contributions to society, it robs them of some of their heritage. To Jews, Muslims, and other non- Christians, memories of persecution and discrimination at the hands of Christians are still alive. Thus the Christian ideal violates the sensitive conscience concerned with fairness.

The weakness of the multicultural ideal is that it encourages racial exclusivism as people place their ethnic identity ahead of their common status as American citizens. This has exacerbated racial divisions in many urban communities. Furthermore, by denying Christianity, it teaches secular values that deny the moral standards necessary for humans to successfully realize the purpose of life. This is deeply offensive to the sensitive conscience concerned with moral righteousness and spirituality.

These problems are magnified in the world at large, where the problems of ethnic violence and religious conflicts defy solution. Again, there are two common approaches: the religious conservatives and fundamentalists want to establish monolithic states with firm moral standards based on one dominant religion (e.g. the Islamic Shariah), and the secularists want a pluralistic society with Western secular values. People line up on one side or the other, but neither has a true answer.

Only the True Parents have shown the way that can overcome this dilemma and satisfy peoples' consciences that are attuned to both fairness and moral righteousness. It begins with a vision of the one family of humankind, centered on God and absolute values. It is created through a mind aspiring to the absolute standard of love which knows no enemies, and developed through individual responsibility and moral action. It continues with a program to substantially overcome social resentments and build lasting bridges between warring tribes, nationalities, and religions. Showing no favoritism and respect for all, it invites people of good will from ever religion, race, and nationality to participate and to lend the deep resources of their traditions to the effort. It is sealed by the Blessing, which joins people together in bonds of eternal love that are stronger than the centrifugal forces of race and ethnicity.

This is the only program that is adequate to the challenge of building peace in a world rent by ethnic and religious conflict. The God- centered family provides a model for unity in diversity; appreciating differences of religion, race and nationality, family members are nevertheless united in love. The model of the family can overcome the tendency to uniformity of religious belief (fundamentalist orthodoxy) because love can reconcile and unite differences. All that is required is the absolute vertical center of True Parents. To demonstrate this ideal our True Parents have fostered inter-religious harmony that absolutely respects religious differences. Likewise, every pronouncement of our True Parents on political and social issues show that they are completely free from favoritism toward any race or nationality. Everywhere and in every instance their purpose is the same: to the establishment of world peace and prosperity through the way of true love.

Here is a new kind of universal vision, not communist or secular, but one that is firmly grounded in spiritual and moral values. It deftly overcomes the modern dilemma posed by the secularist and fundamentalist options. As soon as this program becomes better known, we can anticipate that many people will enthusiastically support it as a "third way" that is moral but not exclusivist, universal but not secularist. Here is the new vision which the world is waiting for to guide it out of its current impasse. It needs only to be recognized.

Therefore, to a people living in darkness, we have the serious responsibility to shine the light of the Completed Testament Age, so that our benighted institutions and their leaders can understand the way to save this confused nation and world. Then the time of tribulations will pass away and the light of peace will dawn. It is finally up to us to bring this about.

Jin-A Alumni Association Formed

The Jin-A Parents' Association has announced the formation of the Jin- A Alumni Family Association. Its purpose will be:

To retain the spiritual roots that our children gained through their first "school" experience at Jin-A.

To foster communication between alumni families. Jin-A families have spread across the world as far away as Russia and Japan.

Encourage children to maintain their friendships made at Jin-A Child Care.

To support Jin-A currently so that future blessed children can receive the same spiritual foundation that children have gained at Jin-A.

The association goals for 1994 include:

Send out initial mailing. Publish a newsletter to keep graduates and their families updated on the activities and achievements of each other. Solicit an average donation of $10 per graduate. With over 250 graduates to date, the total goal is $2,500, to be donated to help maintain the school and property.

Get the word out. Our mailing list is incomplete. If you know other alumni families, share the news and send us your addresses.

If you would like to know more, contact:

Jin-A ALUMNI 
77 Jay Street 
Clifton, NJ 07013

Introduction to Fundraising

by Tom Froehlich

Compiled from required reading sources and class notes for the Development Director Certificate Program at the College of Professional Studies, University of San Francisco

Every not-for-profit organization has to fundraise. Fundraising is an interesting and quite complex art form. Its central force is people. The not-for-profit organization must involve itself with people on a constant and continuing basis if it is to justify its existence or, perhaps more important, ensure its future. As such, fundraising requires development and cultivation of a continuency (people) and is therefore an ideal tool for witnessing.

Philanthropy has become a serious business throughout the world- nowhere more so than in the United States. Fundraising programs are becoming central to the operations of educational, medical, research, service, social, and religious organizations and institutions.

The American people, as individuals, foudnations, and corporations, are responding to human and societal needs, giving more money to charitable causes today than at any other time in their history. By the mid-1980s more than 230 million Americans gave over $70 billion to charitable causes in one year. It is interesting to note that in 1981, approximately one-third of individual charitable donations came from households with income below $20,000. A 1993 estimate puts the amount of total philanthropic giving for 1992 to $124 billion. Here it is interesting to note that 81.9% of that money has been donated by living individuals, 6.6% came from bequests, 4.8% from corporations and 6.7% from foundations. All this may very well indicate that Americans are committed to preserving private philanthropy and that they are clearly a giving people in good and in bad times. However, most of the contributions given by individuals come from discretionary or disposable accounts. Nowadays people are not necessarily lowering their standard of living to be able to make these contributions.

Private philanthropy has been an expression of the American spirit since the early colonial period and is one of the most durable factors of American life. In his writings, Alexis de Tocqueville commented on the uniqueness of the American habits of private generosity. He was impresed by the willingness of the people to give their own funds for social improvements. He observed in his diary that, when Americans saw the need for a school or a hospital or a church or a cultural service, a few local citizens formed an "association" to meet the need, provide the leaders, and then support it.

The first settlers who came to America from England had lived through the years during which private gifts of English merchants and bankers had saved England from social dissolution. Upon their arrival in America, they and the Dutch settlers continued that pattern, building churches, schools, and colleges with their own money. Harvard University in Massachusetts is an example of how Americans contributed generously to provide their children with educational opportunities. Religious denominations soon became eager to build schools and colleges. Most private and many public educational institutions can trace their founding to denominational giving.

Systematic solicitation of the general public began in the early 1900s. Philanthropic giving was still the exclusive reserve of a selected group of America's wealthiest citizens. The "campaign method" of raising money by the YMCA movement changed all that. The campaigns grew out of the concern of many that they were spending too much time beggin for money. The solution was the campaign, staged with fixed goals and time limits, enabling the money-raising chore to be completed quickly. The campaign also introduced the sense-of-urgency factor. The American Red Cross campaigns established additional trends during World War I. Corporate philanthropy emerged, and foundation giving, spurred by the generosity of Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller, added impetus to fundraising programs.

During the past 50 years, the sector has grown at an astounding rate. In 1946, IRS reports were filed by just under 100,000 tax-exempt organizatons. By 1963, that number had risen to between 400,000 and 500,000 groups and since that time, the number has doubled. It is believed that there are now well over 1 million not-for-profit organizations registered in this country. About 98.5 million Americans volunteer for 15.7 billion hours every year.

Organizations of the independent sector came into existence for the purpose of responding to some facet of human or societal need. Through voluntary action, not-for-profit organizations offer services that government and private industry cannot or fail to provide. The United States has increasingly relied on not-for-profit organizations to provide needed public benefits, such as delivering services funded by tax moneys; representing the public interest to both government and business; attending to arts, culture, education, and other enrichment activities; and providing opportunities for self-help, charitable pursuits, and improvements in the quality of life. In recent years the call for philanthropic services has become even more pressing. This independent, not-for-profit sector embodies the American tradition of encouraging any person or group to take the initiative to speak, act, or organize for the public good.

Through the procession of the centuries, the thesis has been established that people want and have a need to give. They will give when they can be assured that these causes can demonstrate their worthiness and accountability in using the gift funds that they receive. However, recent trends indicate that people do not give to organizations anymore. They give to causes and results, or better, they give to people with causes and results. Most people who do not give say that this is because they have not been asked to give.

Ethical fundraising is the enabler, the activator of gift making. It must also be the conscience to the process. Responsible fundraising is that act and the tool that helps provide both individuals and organizations with the vision and opportunities to act on their impulses and interests and to meet the needs of their communities. Fundraising is at its best when it strives to match the needs of the not-for-profit organization with the contributor's need and desire to give.

Fundraising has many parts, each an essential element of the whole. Packaged together tightly, these elements project the total organization into the marketplace, where it can be judged for its relevance on the basis of the appropriateness of its case, the urgency of its needs, the effectiveness of the programs that will respond to these needs, and the quality of its governance and management.

Basic to all of this are the fundraising methods, or the "vehicles" as they are referred to in professional jargon. The basic methods are:

* the Annual Fund, which is a multi-faceted, year-round effort to meet the not-for-profit organization's general income needs;

* Direct Mail, which is concerned with acquiring contributors;

* Grantsmanship, which is the organized solicitation of every type of foundation;

* the Special Gift, or the solicitation of special-purpose gifts or "the big gift";

* the Capital Campaign, which raises funds-often over a set period of several years-to help meet the capital or asset-building needs of the organization;

* Endowments & Planned Giving, which accept gifts to underwrite the perpetuation of the organization from investment holdings, estates, bequests, wills, etc.

Relevant for most "Unification" not-for-profit organizations at this time might be the Annual Fund, Direct Mail, Grantsmanship and the Special Gift. The primary objectives of these vehicles should be the following:

* to get the gift, to get it repeated, and to get it upgraded;

* to build and develop a base of donors, and through this process to establish habits and patterns of giving;

* to raise annual unrestricted and restricted money;

* to inform, involve, and bond the continuency to the organization;

* to use the donor base as a vital source of information to idenitfy potential large donors;

* to promote giving habits that encourage the contributor to make capital and planned gifts; and

* to remain fully accountable to the constituency through annual reports.

Fundraising for all these worthwhile causes is the job of trained professionals working with dedicated volunteers who also have some experience in the art. Fundraising volunteers must be aware that gift making is based on a voluntary exchange. The reasons for making a gift are manifold. Such a reason might be societal recognition, the satisfcation of supporting a worthy cause, a feeling of importance, a feling of making a difference in resolving a problem, a sense of belonging, or a sense of "ownership" in a program dedicated to serving the public good. Giving is a privilege, not a nuisance or a burden. Stewardship nourishes the belief that people draw a creative energy, a sense of self-worth, a capacity to function productively from sources beyond themselves. As Unificationists we know that unselfish giving is essential for anyone and any country wanting to have that spiritual experience.

References

Rosso, Henry A., Achieving Excellence in Fund Raising, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1991.

Burlingame, Dwight F. and Hulse, Lamont J., editors, Taking Fundraising Seriously, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1991.

Broce, Thomas E., Fund Raising, Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, second ed., 1986.

Mixer, Joseph R., Principles of Professional Fundraising, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1993.

Seltzer, Michael, Securing your Organization's Future, New York: The Foundation Center, 1987.

I especially recommend Rosso and Seltzer for anyone involved in starting or managing a not-for-profit organization.

ICUS Holds Planning Meeting to Prepare for 20th Conference

by Gregory Breland-Lexington, KY

On the occasion of the 40th Anniversary of the Unification Church in Korea (HSA-UWC), it was decided to bring together the ICUS Planning Board to not only attend the festivities but also to seriously map out the next International Conference on the Unity of the Sciences (ICUS). The board met from April 28 to May 1 at the Sheraton Walker Hill Hotel in Seoul, Korea. The 20th ICUS will be part of the 2nd World Culture and Sports Festival scheduled for Seoul, Korea in August, 1995.

Dr. Tor Ragnar Gerholm, Professor of Physics Emeritus at the University of Stockholm, Sweden and member of the Nobel Prize Academy and Chairman of the next ICUS presided over the Planning Board meeting with Dr. James A. Baughman, Secretary-General of ICUS. As various proposals were presented it was heartening to see the ideals of Rev. Moon and ICUS being upheld by these professors. There was insistence by the board over and over again that the committees being proposed be international and inter-disciplinary in scope. The ones that failed this criteria were severely criticized and have little chance of being recommended by the Planning Board. There was equally strong insistence that the proposals include various values questions. In all the Planning Board must be commended for its strong stand in upholding the vision of ICUS and its founder, the Rev. Moon.

Below is the preliminary list of suggestions that the ICUS Planning Board will be submitting to the ICF Board of Directors for final approval for the 1995 conference. If any of the readers of the Unification News has contacts or associates that they feel may be able to contribute to these committees either as a paper writer or discussant, send their updated curriculum vita (resume) to the ICUS Secretariat and they will be considered. These individuals should have significant credentials and hold a Ph.D. degree. This must be received by September 15, 1994. If you would like more information about a certain committee, write to the Secretariat. ICUS Secretariat, 147 Goodrich Ave., Lexington, KY 40503, USA. FAX: 606/278-4009

Proposed Chairpersons And Committees

1. Paul Badham - Scientific Objectivity and Human Values (Professor of Theology and Religious Studies, St. David's University College, Lampeter, Wales, UK)

2. Max Jammer - The Philosophy of Physics (Former President, Israel Academy of Sciences, Professor of Physics, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel)

3. Jacquelyn Kegley - Genetic Knowledge, Human Values and Human Responsibility (Outstanding Professor of Philosophy, California State University, Bakersfield, California, USA)

4. Gerard Radnitzky - Values and the Social Order (Professor of Philosophy of Science, Emeritus, University of Trier, Trier, Germany)

5. Ravi Ravindra - Promise and Threat of Science & Technology (Professor of Comparative Religions and Physics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada)

6. Harry Moody - Multiple Dimensions of Aging as a Global Phenomenon (Executive Director, Brookdale Center for Aging, New York City).

Gregory Breland is the Executive Director of ICUS

ICUS Director Honored

Don Harter, president of the Idaho chapter of the American Freedom Coalition, presented the Service Above Self award on April 29, 1994 to Gregory Breland, executive director of the International Conference on the Unity of the Sciences (ICUS).

The award citation commends Breland, of Lexington, Kentucky, for his steadfast leadership in pushing forward the development of ICUS for the achievement of its aims in the course of the last five years.

ICUS is held in various parts of the world, with major meetings every three years. The Seoul gathering was convened to examine the 22-year record of ICUS and plan future projects.

Hyo Jin Moon Gives Keynote Address - Jin Hun Moon and Sung Am Moon Inaugurated as World CARP Vice-Presidents

by Dr. Tyler O. Hendricks-NYC

On a bright Sunday afternoon in midtown Manhattan, four hundred leaders and members of the Unification Church gathered at the National Headquarters chapel for the inauguration of Jin Hun Park Moon and Sung Am Moon as Vice-Presidents of World CARP. Mr. Hyo Jin Moon, President of World CARP, greeted his new assistants in the keynote address. Un Jin Moon, the third daughter of Reverend and Mrs. Moon, and wife of Jin Hun Nim, also attended the event, as did Mr. Jin Sung Park Moon, husband of In Jin Moon, second daughter of Reverend and Mrs. Moon.

The program was convened by Reverend Joong Hyun Pak, Continental Leader of North America, and Dr. Joon Ho Seuk, President of CARP in American and the C.I.S, Included in the audience by special invitation were representative leaders of the American Constitutional Committee, headed up by Michael Smith, which included ACC leaders from as far away as North Carolina and Chicago, and-in response to a personal invitation from Jin Hun Nim, Frank Grow flew in from Hong Kong.

The event opened with a prayer by Rev. Joong Hyun Pak. Emcee Tony Devine, Vice-President of American CARP, then introduced the afternoon's choir, a trio of Manhattan Center recording artists, Torhild Niger (who recently released her first CD in Norway), and Ben and Stian Laurentzen. They captured the mood of the occasion perfectly with a lovely rendition of George Harrison's "Here Comes the Sun."

Dr. James A. Baughman introduced Mr. Sung Am Moon. Mr. Moon is the eldest son of Mr. Yong Sun Moon, a cousin of the Reverend Moon. He obtained a Bachelor's degree in economics from Kyong-gi University in Seoul, and is a recent graduate of the Unification Theological Seminary. After his graduation in 1992, he spent one year as a missionary in the C.I.S. Mr. Moon was a CARP leader in Korea during the 1970s, and also has a business background with Tong-Il and Saeilo.

Mr. Moon gave a comprehensive talk on the vision of CARP as the vehicle to fulfill the process of salvation as outlined in the Completed Testament Age speech, relating young people through Hyo Jin Nim to True Mother. He outlined the importance of education through the media, as developing at Manhattan Center, and called us to develop a more sophisticated, world-level, ecumenically-aware education system.

After Mr. Moon's remarks, Dr. Baughman introduced Jin Hun Nim. He is one of the nine children (including eight sons) of Mr. Chung Goo Park, known as "Tiger" Park, a man who made a tremendous impact in America and Europe as CARP leader from 1979 to 1982. A member of the 36-couple blessing, Tiger Park was famous for his fierce front-line way of life, sleeping together with the brothers in his sleeping bag, driving from center to center across the country, and leading the charge in many a harrowing counter-demonstration against communists on campuses in America and Europe, all the way to the last months of his physical life on earth.

Jin Hun Nim, his eldest son, was blessed with Miss Un Jin Moon in 1986. He has a Bachelor's of Science degree in economics from Columbia University and a Masters of Divinity from the Unification Theological Seminary. He has spent the past year and half teaching and guiding our members in the C.I.S., traveling from Kiev to Vladivostok. He recently delivered the most speeches of all the Moon family in the speaking tour of 100 American campuses (17), in the process getting personally in-touch with the activities of the church and CARP throughout America.

Jin Hun Nim expressed his deep gratitude to be working directly under Hyo Jin Nim, and he pledged his all-out efforts for victory on the front-line. He said that more than study of Principle in workshops, we are vitalized by the bringing of the word to young people who are thirsting for truth and life. He saw it throughout the C.I.S., and he sees the potential for it in America as well.

The keynote address of the afternoon was delivered by Mr. Hyo Jin Moon. Mr. Moon welcomed his new Vice-Presidents, and proceeded to map out a vision for the development of CARP within the larger context of the transformation of culture which is necessary to take place. (See the text of Hyo Jin Nim's speech in this issue of UNews.)

Following the keynote address, Dr. Joon Ho Seuk delivered the closing prayer. Gifts and flowers were presented to the new officers of World CARP, and they cut the celebration cake and led three cheers to begin officially their tenure.

The following morning Jin Hun Nim chaired a major leaders meeting, including the ACC leaders, and by mid-week he and Mr. Moon began a three-week itinerary to meet our leaders and members across America. The main purpose of their visitations: to find the best Divine Principle lecturers in America.

Humanity, Problems, Deceits and True Solutions

by Emanuele Saccarelli-Detroit, MI

As part of the 100-Campus Tour this March-April, CARP sponsored an essay contest in Michigan. This was the winning entry.

When people are asked about the problems that our society faces, the kind of response they come up with is usually on the lines of a fatalistic pessimism, an almost indifferent attitude towards problems that are obviously perceived to be either marginal to one person's life, or simply overwhelming and impossible to solve. When we listen to the news or read in the newspaper about the violence, the disasters, the wars which plague our world, it is easy to get the impression that we are in a hopeless situation, that we are only headed for worse. It is also easy to barricade ourselves around our narrow world of superficial opinions, around our limited, instinctual understanding of people and events, our prompt, ferocious need to give the blame, to point the finger. Yet the answer is neither in our condescending, self-deceiving attitudes, nor in the narrow reasoning which we use to explain why and how things happen. The answer is not in racism, nationalism, materialism; the answer is not in any of our "isms". The answer is God. How could it or would it be anything else? We pride ourselves on our knowledge, our achievements, on how we look, on what we think, but still we stand naked and helpless in front of the very question: Why? Why do we think? Why do we know? Why do we achieve? Why do we exist? We rely on science and politics to find our answers, but still, buried underneath layers of illusions and deceit, within ourselves the answer is present and well alive: God. The God we sense, the God we need, the God we cannot see but, no matter how firmly we deny, we truly know exists.

In today's world, unfortunately, the inherent good of God's message is fragmented and twisted by factions and religious groups, each with its own God, each claiming the holiness of self and the blasphemous evil nature of the "infidels". Because of this, as I write, people kill each other in the name of their god. As we see in the Middle East, the self-appointed "oppressed" morbidly invoke their god to give them the strength to kill their enemies. People blinded by centuries of violence firmly believe that war is justifiable, that God condones the killing and the blood shed for holy wars and sacred causes. This is when God becomes their god, just a dull reflection of their own miserable self. The Universal God accepts no self and condones no war. He does not receive their blood sacrifices. The believers of all creeds and religions have to break away from their self-centeredness, their tribalism, the crazed logic of violence that does not belong to God. This is the reason why Reverend and Mrs. Moon's effort to bring together people and religions, to reconcile what appears to be irreconcilable, has to be appreciated. The creation of the Inter- Religious Federation for World Peace is one of their commendable, concrete initiatives that go in the right direction. Their message has to be heard because we all need to heal from this madness; it has to be understood because we need to first acknowledge, and then to set aside our differences, coming together as a humanity that lives for and because of the love of God. God is our only answer and His love for us can only bring love among ourselves. As we understand His nature, we also get to understand our true nature as loving creatures of a loving God.

The central point of Reverend and Mrs. Moon's message is the family. Our coming to consciousness has to start from our own family. This appeal has to go beyond the hypocritical and empty call for the so- called family values which some of our politicians often resort to. A sincere commitment to the values of a strong family, as the foundation of a better society, has to come from each of us, in our everyday life, in the little, all-important things that shape our daily living and sharing with our parents, spouse and children. A striking example of positive and concrete attempt to lay the basis of true family values came from the event which took place in 1992 in Korea, where Reverend and Mrs. Moon held a wedding celebration for 30,000 couples, all dedicating themselves to one another, to God and to the world.

The effort of leaders and good-willed people like Reverend and Mrs. Moon is fundamental, but we all have to realize that our problems will not be solved unless everyone feels and acts as one irreplaceable part of the solution, not as an indifferent onlooker. We have seen throughout history that as our technology improves, the world becomes a smaller place. The increasing interdependence of economic interests, environmental concerns and social-ethnic conflicts will soon make it impossible for any of us to simply look away from other people's problems. The problems of others would very soon turn back to haunt ourselves. We see this in the problem of increasing disparity of development between the rich and the poor nations of the world.

The simple yet powerful message of Reverend and Mrs. Moon certainly deserves our respect and attention as a possible solution, and as a truly determined effort to finally bring peace and God into our suffering world.

Have you Harnessed the Energy?

by Bruce Dubuque

There is a profound analogy for the Completed Testament Era, in Father's first name that I am sure all Western civilization can relate to.

The Sun is much more than just the center of our solar system. It is a huge collection of atoms in a constant state of re-vitalization called fusion. It is everlasting in terms of human years, and it gives life to everything it touches. The heart of the analogy can be found in the dictionary when you break it down into it's smallest particle or molecular structure.

Fusion: 1\ The act of blending or the state of being blended throughout. 2\ The act or process of changing from a solid into a liquid by the agency of heat; melting. 3\ A nuclear reaction in which light nuclei fuse into those of a heavier element with the release of great energy.

We have definitely all blended together in harmony of purpose from Father's words. We have all most certainly been changed from our solid, stoic selves and melted with his love. Our very nucleus has been elevated to a greater cause, and released into the world with a great deal of energy.

But, what will we do with this energy he has given us. Are we to go fission with the rest of the world?

Fission: 1\ The act of splitting or breaking apart. 2\ The splitting of an atomic nucleus into particles and smaller nuclei with the release of energy.

Do you want to go fission and end in a puff of smoke, or do you want to be everlasting as the Sun above?

If you want to be like Father you must walk Father's path. With Love, not prejudice or bigotry. With peace, not strife or hatred. You are revitalized because he raised you up. No matter what your previous state of heavier element, he was there for you! Will you be there for the person who is in a state of heavier element than you? We must all love the world to blend with it. Not judge the world to consume it! Only by searching out and elevating the heaviest elements in our society can we succeed on a global level to restore peace. Make peace with all of your brothers and sisters, not just your race, or your nation, or your religion. But, all and every single one!

An analogy is like a picture made up of words, or a map showing the course between two points. Quite often it is a vantage point not seen with the naked eye. It is said a fusion reactor will last a thousand lifetimes, a fission reactor just one.

Talk about perpetual energy....it's called reciprocal unconditional love.