Invitation to submit Holy Songs

This is from a memo from Rev. Chung Hwan Kwak’s office in Seoul.

As we usher in the Completed Testament Age and join efforts to built a world of heart centering on true love, we are gathering Holy Songs, church songs and music from different cultures that strive to create a culture of unification.

Members are invited to submit:

Holy Songs:

Content that praises and glorifies God and True Parents

Content on love and the Blessing

Content that praises True Parents' victory

Content that relates to church Holy Days and anniversaries.

Gospel Songs (fellowship songs):

Content that relates to our experiences in our life of faith

Content that touches on hope and joy of the new age

Content that touches on grace, gratitude, sacrifice, repentance and revival aspects in our life of faith

Other Compositions:

Those songs that are composed by members and are being sung during church services, fellowships and celebrations. These songs may be unique to each country or continent, and composers may like to share them with all members.

Children's Holy Song:

Songs to use in kindergarten and Sunday School for children under the age of 14 years.

Content that conveys hope and joy, and is suitable for the education of children's life of faith.

Submissions

Length: Should submit with standard musical bar notes and approximately 32 bars in content.

Please include with your submission, voice indication (soprano, alto, tenor or bass), chord, tempo, lyrics or other musical symbols.

Submission numbers.: No limit.

Deadline: By not later than Jan. 10. 1999.

Material

If only tune and lyrics are available, please seek the help of a musician to complete the song according to the requirements.

Basically the lyrics can be in Korean, English or Japanese. If translation is difficult, then submission in native language is also acceptable.

If possible, submit a recording of the songs on cassette tape.

Please submit details of the composer's position, a brief biography and contact address.

All submissions are non-returnable.

A plaque will be awarded if the submission is selected to be included as an official holy song.

For more information, please contact:

FFWPUI HQ
63-1, Hangang-Ro 3-Ga, Yongsan-Gu
Seoul 140-740, Korea
Tel: (82-2) 796-9348 Fax: (82-2) 796-8248
E-mail: mission@tongil.or.kr

In Memoriam Giusi Johnson

Our dear sister, Giusi Johnson, passed away on October 5th, 1998, at home in Ossining, NY, after a long struggle with breast cancer.

She was born on July 19, 1953, in Bergamo, Italy, and joined the church November 5, 1976. She was Blessed to Mark Johnson at Madison Square Garden on July 1, 1982. They have three sons: Danu, Andrew and Gabriel.

On Wednesday October 7, 1998 the Westchester/Rockland Family Church offered the Seung Hwa Ceremony for Giusi. Over 250 members, family and guests attended the service held at the Edwards-Dowde Funeral Home in Dobbs Ferry, NY, a few miles from Belvedere.

Mr. John Hessel offered the invocation. Mr. Teruaki Nakai, Mr. Kent Trabing, Mrs. Catherine Nelson and husband Mark Johnson offered the testimonies. Everyone agreed that Giusi was a motherly saint that gave God's Love, respect, humility loyality and other noble qualities to each person that she met. Mark's testimony accented the deeper and more intimate relationship between husband and wife.

Mrs. Susan Bouchari offered the Seung Hwa address sharing her heart as a close friend and younger sister to Giusi and the family. Daryl M. Clarke, pastor, was the MC and offered the reading of the biography, A Portrait of a Mother.

In attendence was Giusi's brother Franco, his wife Rosa and Mark's sister Judy.

It was a very beatiful and joyful ceremony that was full of tears and special memories of a life well lived. Giusi is considered a saint by all who knew her.

The Won Jun Ceremony was just as beautiful and peaceful. Our brother Mr. Eric Erstling offered the address. He has a way of making everyone feel relaxed in an uncomfortable situation.

Collectively, all members sent Giusi off with a happy and grateful heart. It was our blessing to have been touched by the presence of Giusi Johnson. Her mission and dweeling in the spirit world will continue to bring joy and liberation to Heavenly Father and True Parents.

Daryl M. Clarke

Her Seung-Hwa was held in Dobbs Ferry on October 7. These are two of the testimonies that were given there.

My Friend Giusi

It’s always an honor to be able to write some words about a friend. It’s an exercise of the heart which we should pursue, whether or not we are asked.

Giusi was blessed by God, because God liked Giusi so much. I think God liked Giusi because she liked God so much in a very natural way. Giusi loved God, Jesus and True Parents and felt close to them. This gave her lots of energy, as evidenced by her take-charge personality and desire to always be where the action was. She loved all of the sales people and wanted to take good care of them. I remember visiting her about one month ago and she confessed that one of the most trying aspects of her illness was being away from the salespeople and those in the office. "Tell everyone how much I miss them," she requested. One often hears the cliché, "When you go to the spiritual world, you won’t wish that you could have done just a little more work in the office." Well, I think with Giusi, she was an exception.

Giusi was competent, coming from northern Italy, close to Milan. I have visited there on business several times, and know this region is one of the most productive business centers in the world, and the people there are very intelligent, highly efficient and of a good and kind heart. Most capable people are picky about what type of work they can do. I can do this well, but don’t ask me to do that. Others are willing to do anything, but are not actually able to do many things well. Giusi was one of those rare people who was competent to do many different tasks, and always willing to do anything.

In the case of our office, one of Giusi’s most valuable functions was listening to people. Anyone who worked around her knows two of her favorite listening words: "That’s right...that’s right...oh...that’s right...." Once I was ranting on about a particularly frustrating dilemma and she was listening to me will full intensity saying "That’s right." After several minutes, I looked at her and said, "Giusi, if you were listening to the party on the other side of this situation, you’d be saying the same thing." She looked at me and smiled: "That’s right!"

Giusi could listen because she cared about people and respected them. I first encountered her over the phone, when I was managing a division in California. I would call in to headquarters and she would answer the phone. If the person I asked to speak to wasn’t available, then she would say, "Well, go ahead and tell me, Mr. Trabing, because I’m the one who will take care of it, anyway." I said, "Giusi, you don’t need to say ‘Mr. Trabing.’ Nobody out here calls me that, because that’s what California is like." "Well," she told me, "I’m going to say, ‘Mr. Trabing’." In this way, she insisted on lifting others up.

As you have heard, Giusi’s heart was big. She could listen to salespeople for a long time. When she was asked to levy penalties on those salespeople who didn’t report on time, she always took it on herself to call them up personally to get their reports, so they would avert the penalty.

Humor was one of Giusi’s gifts. Even just a few days ago, I visited her. Mark told me that I could go in and see if she was awake. I went in, and she opened her eyes a little. This energetic, take-charge mother figure for so many, many people now could hardly move. "Come sit down over here, Kent," she whispered. I came by her bedside close to her. But it was a hospital bed with the steel railings on the side, so I couldn’t sit down. She slowly moved her hand over to the control switch, and pressed the button, lowering the steel bars, allowing me to sit down. "Kent," she whispered her trademark little chuckle, "I can still dominate the bed."

Giusi’s energy, this life force she possessed, was such that you would not be aware that she was fighting a deadly disease. In fact, she wanted to and did go beyond herself. From witnessing at the shopping center in order to Bless 185 families, to taking care of my visiting parents this spring while my wife and I were away, to challenging the mountain at Chung Pyung Lake.

God has surely blessed Giusi and is happy with her life. We pray for her and her wonderful family-Mark and the boys, Danu, Andrew and Gabriel.

Kent Trabing

Appreciating Giusi

I first knew Giusi 15 years ago, when we worked together on MFT in Florida, then again from 1990, when our company moved to NY. She was office manager and I was her boss. However, I really felt our relationship was more like elder brother and sister.

Giusi worked about three years as a Florida MFT regional mother, around 15 years ago. At that time, I was the leader of the Florida MFT. MFT’s schedule was very hard day after day, year after year. There were many young people around 20 years old and they had young people’s problems. They were often spiritually down and struggling and had to work out their difficulties. Florida’s weather is hot all year. The sun is strong, burning our skin when we work outdoors, even in January.

There were many oriental members in the Florida MFT. Their faces were turning black, and their teeth were really white. Also, Florida is one of the best tourist areas, with beaches and amusement parks; there are many short-term visitors, especially young people. We received a lot of persecution. So, naturally, we needed somebody like a mother to receive our suffering, concerns, and also to listen to our good experiences. Giusi was the most qualified person for that kind of job.

She liked to take care of people and listen to them, suffering with them. She was like fresh air among the members, smiling all the time, with a big heart, and she accepted many kinds of problems from members. Everyone needed her and she ways always with them, like an Italian mama.

At that time, she had been in the U.S. just 4 or 5 years. She was not fluent in English, but she was popular among oriental members from Japan and the Philippines as well as Americans, Europeans and Africans. So many different kinds and races of people felt embraced by Giusi’s character. If a member had some problem and went to see Giusi, I felt very confident in her care of them. That’s why the Miami MFT atmosphere was always bright and had a high spirit.

Miami MFT had a special campaign during Valentine’s Day, Easter and Mother’s Day. I remember she worked very hard at a flower stand.

From 1992, I worked with Giusi at UVS, a specialty retail company. We operate kiosks in the malls, selling gift items in 30 locations throughout the year. We needed someone to communicate between the home office and salespeople. Giusi was naturally that kind of person, and became the home office mom. She took care of salespeople as her children.

She would listen to their problems and suffering. When they had trouble with the manager or home office, they would always call Giusi. So I always felt safe when Giusi was taking care of them. We always had a mom in the office.

Giusi had great sales and office management skills. When she had a gold jewelry kiosk to manage, it was one of the top nationwide. Also, when work was requested of her from various managers, including myself, in the home office, she finished it with efficiency and did a great job. Even in her home I could see her organizational ability. She had three sons, but her home was always neat and clean.

United Vision Sales has a couple of hundred employees. Every year, we choose an "employee of the year." She won in 1997. People’s comments about her were that she thinks of the group point of view, not just one company. She received a plaque, a gift, and a statement of respect from the president of our company at the managers’ meeting. When she spoke, she said: "I always think of you and everyone as my family, so each person is like my elder or younger sister or brother."

Three weeks ago, I met Giusi. Her body had become much worse, because cancer entered her lungs and there was a lot of fluid there. She had a difficult time breathing and her body was always in pain. She knew she was dying.

I went to visit her and she told me, "It’s the best time to testify to my family as a good mother, because out of gratitude I want to smile all the time and show appreciation to God and my family even in pain."

Just three days before she died, I saw her one last time. She could move, just lying in bed; even with oxygen it was difficult to breathe. When I talked to her she was so tired she had to close her eyes, even after just one minute. Then she opened her eyes and said, "Mr. Nakai, please go down and eat dinner." She cared for other people more than herself, even at the end.

She is a good mother for her family, her company and everybody. From her we learned about serving others, caring for others more than herself, having a big heart which accepts everybody, and always appreciating God. Giusi, I pray for you to continue even more in the spiritual world. Thank you, Giusi.

Mr. Nakai

How To Have A Healthy & Happy Marriage

Seven Essential Elements for True Marital Fulfillment
by Bento Leal-Sacramento, CA

Marriage, as the Bible, says is where "a man leaves his father and his mother and cleaves to his wife, and they become one flesh." (Genesis 2:24) By definition, then, marriage is a joining together of a man and a woman, a husband and a wife, into a new creation wherein God can dwell and express His love more fully. Thus, a true marriage reflects the fullness of God’s nature, a man and woman united in the image of God, receiving His bountiful love and expressing it freely to each other, to their children and to others. Such a marriage is truly a blessing to the couple themselves, and to the world at large.

Most married couples wonder how they can create a strong, lasting and joyful marriage. Often the joint pursuit of spiritual ideals is recommended to the couple as the best and only path toward achieving true marital harmony and fulfillment.

However, while such spiritual ideals may be noble and deeply desired to attain and embody, to many they often appear too otherworldly and unreachable. Many couples, therefore, often lose hope that these ideals can actually be achieved. What is needed, then, is practical advice and guidance for a couple to quite literally put those ideals into practice, into reality in their daily lives.

Fortunately, there are numerous books and courses available on the topic of marriage improvement for couples to study and put into practice. While each of these books and courses has its own unique ideas and suggestions, there are several fundamental principles that emerge as perhaps universally relevant to marriage.

The following "7 Traits of a Healthy & Happy Marriage" represent some of these principles and, while not exhaustive or exclusive, are offered as vehicles for couples to put their hopes and ideals into daily practice and help them realize their dream of having a healthy and happy marriage.

The Seven Traits of a Healthy & Happy Marriage. The husband and wife will be Successful in Marriage if they:

1. Have Mutual Faith in God and Shared Spiritual Values
2. Regularly Communicate
3. Sincerely Love Each Other
4. Respect and Appreciate Each Other's Uniqueness
5. Love Their Children, and Others, Together
6. Actively Serve the Larger Community
7. Live and Work Daily for the Highest Ideals

The format for this text is as follows: First, the trait is identified. Then a fundamental principle or truth pertaining to that trait is listed as a guidepost to help accomplish that trait. Next, a core problem is mentioned which interferes with one’s ability to embody that principle and trait. A fundamental practice is then proposed as the way to solve the problem and regain a direction toward living that principle. Finally, some suggested actions are presented as ways for the couple to practically implement the solutions in their daily lives, growing their individual selves and marriage toward the marriage ideal.

1. Have Mutual Faith in God and Shared Spiritual Values

The Principle: God is the creator, our heavenly parent, and we are each His children. God’s love is imbued into each person and is therefore the basis for the couple's love.

The Problem: Due to the Fall of humankind (Genesis 3), we each have an inherent inclination toward selfishness which separates us from God, and hence from our true selves, from each other, and from the rest of creation.

The Practice: We must reconnect to God and His love & truth through prayer, study of His inspired Word, and righteous action.

By far, the most important ingredient in a healthy and happy marriage is the couple’s mutual faith in God and shared spiritual values. God’s Love is a living and real energy that has the power to unite and heal. Whether their individual character be similar or extremely opposite to each other, the thing that brings and holds the couple together into true oneness is their common faith, and the love centered on that shared faith.

Consider two balls at each end of a string. If one ball tries to pull the other one over to its side and the other one pulls back, there won’t be any harmony or unity. But if you grab that string in the middle and lift it up, the two balls will come together. Such is shared faith. The husband is imperfect and vacillates, the wife is imperfect and vacillates - the only thing that can bring them together is that stable, perfect, third, higher position - God. By praying together, and studying God’s Word, lifting their hearts and minds upward, and inviting God into their lives and marriage, then the couple has the basis for true unity and lasting love.

Whenever they have difficulty communicating, or demand that the other person totally change and come over to their side of the argument, they should stop and pray to God, seek His counsel, invite Him into their discussion and try to see the situation, and each other, from His parental viewpoint. Then, with renewed humility before God, and a repentful heart toward each other, they will find the ways to communicate constructively and reconcile, and thereby approach greater harmony and love. God will pour His healing love and wisdom into that marriage.

A true marriage has a husband and a wife, with God at the center, thus creating a trinity of true love.

Suggested Actions: Set a time each day for at least several minutes of prayer and study of God's Word together. Discuss the relevance of the study content to your own daily life. Share spiritual insights and experiences with each other when they occur. Attend a church together regularly, and fellowship with like-minded couples and families. Imagine and believe that God is in the midst of your couple always.

2. Regularly Communicate

The Principle: Sincere give and take (giving and receiving) with each other centered on a Godly parental viewpoint toward the other brings true unity and love.

The Problem: Again, due to the Fall, we are generally inclined toward self-centeredness. We therefore lack for concern and sensitivity to the importance and value of sincere communication with others, including (and sometimes especially) with our spouse.

The Practice: We need to make real time for honest and sincere communication with each other-heart to heart, mind to mind. By word and deed, we need to communicate with each other constantly with love, affection and straightforwardness.

The happily married couple speak honestly and listen fully to each other. In addition to being husband and wife, they are true friends. They set aside a time and place (perhaps alone at the dinner table late in the evening) to discuss their goals, plans, children, schedules, finances, meaningful experiences, etc. They communicate with each other the deep and meaningful things that are on their minds.

They track their progress toward reaching their goals, and adjust their plans and schedules accordingly to eventually reach those goals. Like two shipmates on the ocean of life, they work together as a team to constantly steer their marriage ship in the direction to reach their goals.

They recognize and believe that regular, sincere communication is the "give-and-take", the glue, that binds them together into an ideal whole, and prevents misunderstandings from occurring. They also practice the adage that "we each have two ears and one mouth, and we should use them in that proportion." If each party listens to the other well, then good communication is surely to occur. No matter how busy their lives and schedules, they make the time for meaningful discussion. As an automobile’s engine needs constant oil to run well for years and years, so also regular communication is the oil that makes a marriage run smoothly.

Also, the couple doesn’t harbor grievances against each other, but rather when difficulties or differences of opinion arise, they seek the proper moments to express and resolve their problems and differences constructively in open communication.

Suggested Actions: In the morning (or night before), share with each other the goals and plans for the day; then discuss with each other at the end of the day how things went.

Schedule a time each week (set an appointment with each other), perhaps a Sunday evening, to spend several minutes (even an hour or two if necessary) to discuss goals, plans, etc., for the coming week and month.

Keep in mind that marriage is a life partnership, a shared journey-we plan, act and live together; though at times we may be physically apart, our hearts and spirits are one.

3. Sincerely Love Each Other

The Principle: Our spouse is God’s beloved child and therefore deserving of our love as a true brother or sister, husband or wife, co-parent and friend.

The Problem: In our busy lives, we often forget to see things and each other from God’s viewpoint of unconditional serving and giving love. It’s very easy for us, then, to dwell on and resent the other’s imperfections, rather than appreciate the value of the whole person.

The Practice: Remind yourself that your spouse is a "gift from God". Focus on the lovable qualities of your spouse. See the best in each other. Practice viewing each other from God’s viewpoint of unconditional serving and giving love.

While the phrase "sincerely loving each other" may seem like an obviously important trait in a healthy and happy marriage, it is not something which happens automatically. Love is a willful act arising from a heart of care and concern; it is not simply a spontaneous feeling of the moment, or something we do when we "feel like it". Love is a seed that grows and blooms over time through careful and deliberate nurturing of the relationship.

The happily married couple love each other, regardless of their strengths and weaknesses, and constantly seek ways to nourish, enlarge and expand that love. They see themselves as two halves to a larger, and growing, whole. They try to see each other "from God’s point of view", i.e., that before they are a husband and a wife, they are a man and a woman, a beloved son and daughter of God, their heavenly parent.

Because of such love, they avoid extramarital affairs and flirtations because they know that such behavior would only but lead to a rupture of faith and love, and the ultimate disintegration of their marriage, as well as the terrible hurt and pain such affairs would cause all parties involved.

Suggested Actions: Pray to have God’s heart of unconditional love for your spouse.

Listen attentively to each other with a sincere and loving heart.

Serve your spouse with acts of kindness and concern. For example, when your spouse is tired from a long and busy day, give him/her a shoulder massage.

Help out with household chores.

Identify your spouse’s needs and desires and try to help them be fulfilled. Such sincere service and care (a form of sacrifice) fosters a parental and loving heart in the giver toward the recipient.

Spend quality time together. Go out on a date, whether to dinner and or even a short walk around the block. Enjoy simply being together as husband and wife, as dearest friends!

Buy small gifts for each other. Surprise each other with acts of kindness (e.g., flowers, a kiss on the cheek, a hug, and an "I love you"). Know that even the little acts of kindness can have big and memorable impact.

4. Respect and Appreciate Each Other's Uniqueness

The Principle: Just as I am God’s unique creation, His special child, so also is my spouse.

The Problem: We're often so caught up in our own personal lives and concerns that we may fail to truly appreciate our own and our spouse's special personality and value as God’s unique son and daughter. We therefore may resent our spouse's differences in temperament and behavior wondering "why isn't he or she just like me?"

The Practice: As we each read and study God’s Words, we realize that He is speaking them directly and uniquely to me. We should perceive and enjoy His Creation as though He is giving it all to me. When we therefore recognize how much God is personally loving and caring for us, we will likewise know that He is feeling and doing the same for our spouse as well, and we should therefore respect, appreciate and even venerate our spouse as being so dearly beloved by God as we are.

The happily married husband and wife look for and appreciate the unique God-given qualities in each other. They allow for each other to be their own person, to have their own time and space to be themselves. They recognize the importance of personal integrity and individuality - that each person, particularly their spouse, is a "unique expression of the nature of God".

They see their character differences as complementary qualities rounding out the qualities the other may lack, thereby creating a "balanced" couple-again, two halves to a larger whole.

Suggested Actions: Encourage and respect your spouse's need to have their own private time and space. Each spouse should take some private time each week (each day!) for personal time with God and his or her inner self.

Go for a prayer walk; take time for reflection and meditation alone somewhere. Watch the waves on a beach! Recharge thyself! Encourage your spouse to do likewise.

5. Love Their Children, and Others, Together

The Principle: Children are the fruit of the True Love between husband and wife, and the offspring of God. All people are created by God; thus, we are all brothers and sisters of one larger human family.

The Problem: We are often angered and impatient at the immaturity of our children, and of other people. We fail to see and love them from God’s viewpoint of unconditional parental love.

The Practice: As individuals and as a couple, practice seeing and loving your children, and other people, with God’s Heart of unconditional love.

The happily married couple love each of their children uniquely and the family as a whole. They recognize and accept that parenting is a "team" effort. They understand and respect that their children are a "gift from God" entrusted to them by God to raise in the ways of goodness. They therefore often sacrifice their own personal desires and needs in order to serve the desires and needs of their children. And they do it with Love and Joy.

Also, each parent beholds how beautifully their spouse loves and cares for the children, thus endearing the spouses all the more to each other. By cooperating together in loving their children, the parents are brought into a greater oneness with each other.

Whether or not they have children of their own, they nonetheless love other people, both young and old, with a parental and caring heart.

Suggested Actions: Spend time with each child individually (one-on-one), and as parents together. Listen to what your children have to say.

Sit down together as husband and wife at least once a week and discuss how each child is doing, what his/her needs are, and the ways and plans to fulfill them.

Then, whether you have children or not, discuss and plan how to help others in need-your friends, relatives, workmates, church members, and others in your community.

6. Actively Serve the Larger Community

The Principle: True peace and harmony result when the individual serves the family, the family serves the society, the society serves the nation, the nation serves the world, and the world serves God. The part serves the whole and, in turn, the part is served by the whole.

The Problem: Another aspect of self-centeredness is to narrow and limit one's expression of love to one's own marriage and family, failing to see the relevance and even existence of the larger human family. Such an attitude creates an "us" and "them" perspective regarding the rest of humanity-for example, seeing the poor and disadvantaged as strangers or "them" instead of one of "us", fellow members of the larger human family.

The Practice: Practice serving others, particularly those in need beyond your immediate family. Be generous with your love, money, time and energy.

The happily married husband and wife are not selfish with their love, but rather seek to share and expand it. They sincerely recognize that their relatives, and also their immediate community, are their larger extended family. They care for their nation and world.

Such a couple finds practical ways to serve their community, recognizing that in serving the larger whole they are serving themselves as well (The more you give, the more you receive). They therefore volunteer their heart, time, energy and resources in such ways as: being active in the local PTA; joining a service organization like Rotary, Lions, etc.; being foremost members in their church; being politically active; donating money to charities, volunteering to mentor young people or serving food to the homeless. And being a friendly next-door neighbor.

They also behold the beautiful serving nature they see in their spouse and therefore love and respect each other all the more.

Suggested Actions: Take the time, perhaps at the weekly meeting mentioned earlier, to discuss and list the ways to be actively involved in some kind of local or church volunteer project, or a community service organization, on a regular basis.

Then make the plans and determinations to actually do the work in a clear and scheduled way, perhaps one or a few hours a week. Follow through on your commitment with real action.

7. Live and Work Daily for the Highest Ideals

The Principle: God is the origin and author of truth and love. He designed and created me and my spouse to grow "in His image", becoming persons of true character in the pursuit and attainment of the highest ideals. My spouse was likewise so created.

The Problem: We often live for narrow, short-sighted and temporal concerns, thus limiting and restricting our true potential to realize God’s ideals in our life.

The Practice: Again, God's Words (in the form of the Bible and other inspirations) can guide us and broaden our understanding of the purpose and meaning of life. We should therefore read and study God’s Words to discover the virtues and truths that serve as the basis for wholesome and productive living and strive to put those ideals into practice daily.

The happily married couple live each day individually and jointly to bring joy and glory to God and to be a blessing to the larger community and world. Their highest ideals are summarized in Jesus’ immortal words: "You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind. This is the great and first commandment. And a second is like it. You shall love your neighbor as yourself. On these two commandments depend all the law and the prophets." (Matthew 34:37-39)

They vow and live to make the world a better place. They seize each day as an opportunity to improve themselves, their marriage and their family and to help improve the lives of those around them.

Suggested Actions: Ask yourselves at your weekly meeting, "How did we love and serve God and others in meaningful ways this past week? What specific ways can we can we love and serve God and others this coming week?"

Again, regularly studying God’s Words and praying together for specific things refreshens, informs and enlivens the soul, and serves to bring you and your spouse into a holy, loving, growing and lasting spiritual and physical oneness.

Connecting to the Source of True Love

In conclusion, it’s important to remind ourselves of the most fundamental starting point for any healthy and happy marriage: the individual's personal relationship with the Living God. This relationship precedes every other. God is our heavenly parent, the wellspring and source of true love. He yearns for the most intimate relationship with each and every one of us. His love is the source of any meaningful love we may ever hope to have. Before we are a man or a woman, a husband or a wife, we are each first and foremost a child of God, His beloved, and we remain so forever. So, more than any other love, let us reflect upon and cultivate this most precious and essential of loves-an intimate and enduring relationship with God, our creator and heavenly parent.

Nourished by this root of true love, the couple's marriage tree will surely blossom and grow, and bear great and lasting fruit.

Bento Leal is the California Regional Coordinator of the American Leadership Conference, a project of the American Constitution Committee.

Elizabeth - Film revue

Simon Kinney
Director: Shekhar Kapur

Cate Blanchett as Elizabeth I, Richard Attenborough as Sir William Cecil, Geoffrey Rush as Sir Francis Walsingham, Joseph Fiennes as Lord Robert Dudley, and Sir John Guilgud as the Pope

‘Elizabeth’ is a vivid and powerful portrayal of Queen Elizabeth I and her rise to power as a young woman besieged by the political skullduggery and intrigue of sixteenth-century England. The division of Catholics and Protestants sets the tone for acute religious persecution, which brings the viewer into a state of shock for the first ten minutes of the film.

The most powerful idea that this film portrays is the seemingly ironic reality that the world needed democracy in order for the Messiah to be born. The treachery and murder that dominates this part of history, which is extraordinarily well portrayed in ‘Elizabeth’, makes it clear that any entrance of a Messianic figure into such a scandalous and often barbaric environment would have meant certain death. It is true to some degree that artistic pursuit flourished within monarchical systems, and Elizabeth’s court boded well for European writers and composers in general as Elizabethan England grew to become the most powerful nation in the world under her forty four year rule.

However the seat of power and education was corrupted from within, to a level where divergence from the letter of the law meant in many instances, execution or exile. This tradition was to a certain extent established by Elizabeth’s own father, Henry the VIII, when his most trusted political advisor, Thomas More was put to death for following his own conscience. More had disagreed with Henry’s desire for a divorce in order to try and gain an heir to the throne through a second marriage.

To whit it must be pointed out that the Family is not a neutral state of bliss devoid of forbearance, but a blazing white hot amalgamation of history, in all its glorious splendor, complicated treachery and social misdemeanors.

Never would I take my children to this film, apart from the fact that it is rated R, but for the sake of feeling the gravity of the present, it is definitely a film that cannot be missed.

Come Break a Leg with CARP

Well, not really. But why not come to our exciting annual SKI WORKSHOP in Boulder, CO. Two days of fast and furious skiing (or gentle, you choose!). Two days of stimulating lectures. God’s Day celebration with 300 members. Great food for the body and spirit. Here are this year’s dates:Schedule

Sun., Dec. 27: Arrivals-Come early to rent your ski gear

Mon., Dec. 28: Ski Days-At Eldora resort, just 40 minutes from the Academy. Friendly family resort with classes and skiing for all levels

Tues., Dec. 29-30: Workshop-At the University of Colorado. Separate programs for new guests, members, leaders and ghosts

Thurs., Dec. 31: Workshop-At the University of Colorado. Pure Love seminar for everyone with a special program for children

Fri., Jan. 1: Celebration-True God’s Day Celebration. At the World CARP Academy, and the University of Colorado

Sat., Jan. 2: Departures-Leave after breakfast. Have a great year!

Fees:

CARP Members & Guests

Includes five days and five nights accommodation at the World CARP Academy, and all meals from Sunday dinner to Saturday breakfast: Skiing $210, Non-Skiing $140

Family Package per person

Includes lunch and dinner only from Sunday dinner to Friday dinner: Adult Skiing $150, Children under 12 $100, Children under 5 $50

Book your own motel or use our special CARP rate. Adult non-skiing 75, Children under 12 $50, Children under 5 $30

Notes:

1. Book now before prices rise

2. Economy Motel Accommodation: CARP Special Rate: Double Bed $46, Two Double Beds $55

3. Ski Prices include $25 for rental equipment. Deduct if you bring your own

4. Non-skiers can enjoy special rates at the Louisville Recreation Center, which offers swimming, waterslides, sauna and jacuzzi. Organized excursions on ski days

To make a reservation please call Andrea Rissanen at (303) 447 9402. 

Brazil Religious Freedom Meeting Finds Common Ground for 'New Millennium'

by Dan Fefferman-Washington, DC

The crowning achievement for the International Coalition for Religious Freedom (ICRF) in 1998 came at its Sao Paulo conference, entitled "Religious Freedom in Latin America and the New Millennium." The conference brought together more than 120 scholars, human rights activists, religious leaders and legal experts from 33 countries at Sao Paulo's prestigious Sheraton Moferrej Hotel, October 10-12.

The Sao Paulo conference came on the foundation of three earlier conferences, also dealing with "Religious Freedom and the New Millennium," in Washington DC, Tokyo and Berlin. Speakers at these conferences included such figures as Nobel laureate and former president of Costa Rica Oscar Arias, National Association of Evangelicals president Don Argue, Freedom House president Adrian Karatnycky, and former prime minister of Ireland, Albert Reynolds.

The Sao Paulo meeting was characterized by a spirit of openness and cooperation between North and South American delegates, as well as an attitude of mutual respect between Protestants and Catholics, and between Christian and non-Christian participants. Organizers were particularly pleased by the participation of noted representatives of the Catholic Church in Latin America, notably Fr. Carlos Mario Alzate, Director of the Ecumenical Department of the Episcopal Council of Colombia, and Dr. Lina Boff, Professor of Theology at the Pontifical Catholic University at Rio De Janeiro.

From a practical standpoint, the Sao Paulo conference presented difficult challenges. Not only was it organized in a record short time of less than three weeks, but conference staff faced a serious problem in securing visas for participants. The Brazilian embassy in the US and other countries at first declined to issue any visas for the conference, claiming that the ICRF, because of its open and proud association with the Unification Church and the Reverend Sun Myung Moon, was suspect. Among those who stood to be turned down under this policy were the head of a prestigious human rights organizations and a former US Assistant Secretary of State for the Western Hemisphere.

After several tense days of negotiations and communications between Brazilia and Washington, DC, the Embassy's original policy was reversed and visas were finally issued for all participants. Several delegates commented that their trouble obtaining a visa helped them appreciate the fact that freedom of speech and religion cannot be taken for granted, even in a relatively open society such as Brazil's.

Previous ICRF conferences also had to overcome obstacles of prejudice. During the Washington DC conference, an associate of a delegate from Venezuela was held overnight by police and closely questioned concerning the conference's schedule, speakers, funding and purpose. At the Tokyo conference, Russian delegates could not obtain visas to enter Japan. A week later, at the Berlin conference, hotel officials, under pressure from opponents of new religions, attempted unsuccessfully to persuade conference organizers to cancel its optional interfaith service and drop one of its featured speakers. Thankfully, none of these problems, with the exception of the Russian delegates' inability to attend in Tokyo, seriously affected the conferences' accomplishments.

As if on cue on October 9, the day before the Sao Paulo conference, the US Senate unanimously passed the "International Religious Freedom Act" requiring the US government to impose sanctions on those countries that engage in violations of religious freedom.

At the opening banquet on Saturday Evening, delegates were welcomed to Brazil by Mr. Marco Polo del Nero, a well known attorney and head of the Brazilian Federation of Soccer Referees. Mr. Jose Maria Eymael, head of the Brazilian Social Democratic Party and a recent candidate for President of Brazil, also greeted the participants. The keynote address was given by Dr. Robert Muller, Chancellor Emeritus of the UN University for Peace in Costa Rica, who inspired the audience with a vision of religious freedom as the foundation for world peace and unity in the new millennium.

Sunday morning began with the optional Interfaith Worship Service, followed by breakfast and a morning plenary session. Featured speakers were Mr. Dong Moon Joo of the Washington Times Foundation, who spoke on "Religious Freedom and World Peace" and Mr. Elliott Abrams of the Ethics and Public Policy Center in Washington DC, who addressed the topic "North America, Latin America and Religious Freedom." Both talks were greeted with great enthusiasm by the participants.

"The most essential freedom of all is the freedom of religious conscience--the freedom to worship, to believe and to practice the faith of one's choosing," said Mr. Joo. "Without religious freedom, the freedoms of speech, of the press, of association, of movement and of the marketplace are incomplete, and ultimately impossible. As the Second Vatican Council declared, 'The right to religious freedom has its foundation in the very dignity of the human person.'"

Mr. Abrams, who formerly served as the U.S. State Department's Assistant Secretary for the Western Hemisphere, also emphasized the central role of religious freedom as a fundamental human right: "Religious freedom came late to the world. It was far easier in many cultures to allow some freedom of movement, of political speech, of voting rights, than to allow people to believe what was seen as 'error' and as sin. But today we have truly realized that religious freedom is an essential cornerstone of all human rights and all freedoms. If men and women are deprived even the ability to worship their God, and to raise their children in their religion, we can be sure that no other freedom is safe."

The second plenary session dealt more specifically with the topic "Religious Freedom in Latin America and the Caribbean Today." Luis Ramirez of the Committee for Religious Liberty in Venezuela covered the Caribbean, while Dr. Paul Sigmund of Princeton University and Mr. Pedro Moreno of The Rutherford Institute covered Latin America from Catholic and Protestant perspectives, respectively.

During lunch, former US Senator Larry Pressler addressed participants on the question "Religious Freedom and Inter-American Relations." Sen. Pressler stressed the importance of democracy as a foundation for religious freedom and praised Latin America's progress in the regard over the past two decades. He said the US can feel justly proud that it contributed to this process by helping Latin American nations resist the threat of communist totalitarianism.

The first afternoon breakout sessions covered a) the Theological and Historical Aspects of Religious Freedom in Latin America and b) The New Pluralism and Religious Freedom in Latin America. Topics and speakers included:

Committee A: Theological and Historical Aspects

The Historical Background-Antonio Stango, Helsinki Commission, Italy

Developments Since Vatican II-Lina Boff, Pontifical Catholic University, Rio de Janeiro

Directions for Religion at the Turn of the Millennium-Lisias Nogueira Negrao, University of Sao Paulo

Current and Future Issues-Jose Yelincic, Bolivia

Committee B: The New Pluralism and Religious Freedom

Evangelical Denominations and Catholic Culture-Carlos Mario Alzate, Episcopal Conference of Colombia

The Moral Challenge of Religious Diversity-Lewis Rambo, San Francisco Theological Seminary

The Changing Landscape of Religion and Freedom-Adrian Karatnycky, Freedom House

The second round of breakout sessions dealt with the topic "Beyond Toleration." Committee A featured a mini-workshop in "Deep Dialogue" led by Dr. Leonard Swidler editor of the Journal of Ecumenical Studies and Dr. Ashok Gangadean of the Global Dialog Institute. Committee B covered "Overcoming Religious Intolerance." Topics at speakers are as follows:

International Agreements and the Protection of Religious Freedom-Lee Boothby, International Academy for Freedom of Religion and Belief

Media Sensationalism and Its Effects-Larry Moffitt, Tiempos del Mundo

The Evolving Role of the State in Interfaith Relations-Paul Martin, Columbia University Center for Human Rights

The UNO Convention and ECLA Regional Agreements-Giulio Murano, International Federation of Human Rights, Italy

The dinner program featured a speech by well known Brazilian journalist and author Jorge Boaventura, who spoke on "The Responsibility of the State to Defend Religious Freedom." This was followed by a program of Brazilian music emceed by Mr. Antonio Betancourt of the Summit Council for World Peace.

The next morning, delegates gathered at 9:00 a.m. for the session on "Religious Freedom Concerns." Here, a panel of distinguished representatives of various religious groups gave brief presentations about the concerns of their particular religious communities. Included, were Catholic, Protestant, Native Brazilian, African Brazilian, Scientologist, Unificationist, and Buddhist perspectives. Speaking on behalf of Unificationism, Mr. Betancourt listed several urgent contemporary problems:

The infringement of Reverend and Mrs. Moon's right to travel to several major European countries through an unjustifiable use of the Schengen Treaty, which was designed limit the immigration of terrorists.

The failure of the government of Japan to take action to protect the religious freedom of more that 200 Unificationists each year who undergo the torture of forced "deprogramming" each year in that country.

The refusal of Japan to allow Reverend Moon to enter the country to officiate at next year's planned events during the World Cultural and Sports Festival.

A continuing atmosphere of prejudice and suspicion against Unificationists as "cultists," fed by hateful stereotypes and media sensationalism.

The conference concluded with committee reports the adoption, under the chairmanship of ICRF president Bruce Casino of a Joint Declaration on Religious Freedom, based on the earlier documents created in Tokyo and Berlin.

The Declaration reads in part:

Each religious faith should receive equal protection of its religious freedom and there should be no hierarchy of religious faiths established by government policy or action on religious freedom.

Legislative committees or government agencies or government lists or other government activities which focus only on minority religious faiths should not be formed or undertaken since their narrow focus discriminates between categories of religions on a discriminatory basis and has resulted in discrimination against minority faiths.

The forcible kidnapping of members of a religious faith in order to force them to change their faith ("deprogramming") and other forms of religious vigilantism are a violation of religious freedom and should be vigorously prosecuted by government authorities.

Immigration and other laws and treaties should not be applied to restrict the ability of believers and leaders of religious faiths and their representatives to establish and maintain direct personal contacts and communication with each other...

Discrimination in employment, obtaining of government benefits, housing, or political participation based on religious faith should not be permitted

There should be no religious litmus test for serving in public office.

Use of the term "cult" or "sect" by government agencies has developed a pejorative connotation and the terms "religion," "minority religion," "small religion," or "new religion" should be used instead.

For more information, check ICRF's website at www.religiousfreedom.com

Book Review: The Children

Reviewed by Kathryn L. Coman

The Children, by David Halberstam (New York: Random House, 1998), 783 p.

"On the first day of the sit-ins, in Nashville, Tennessee, eight young black college students found themselves propelled into the leadership of the civil rights movement, as the movement-and America-entered a period of dramatic change. The courage and vision of these young people changed history."

With these words, Halberstam begins his documentary on these eight students, the events brought about by their actions and those around them. The events of the book begin in 1960. When I think about what I was doing in 1960, I realize that I was just 8 years old. Growing up in Michigan and not much interested in current events, I was completely unaware of these activities. Yet I found as I read, that much of what they did changed society in such a way that I and my family would be able to reap the benefits.

Since I married a black man in 1982 and have gone on to have three children, the issues these children faced and what is left to be done to eradicate racial prejudice between all races are now very personal issues. Though I have always been concerned about others, particularly those treated unjustly, what affects my children concerns me even more. Therefore, I decided to read this book and learn more about these events.

I found that as I read I learned more than just the events themselves. I was fascinated by reading about people I have met in my work with the activities of the Unification Church and organizations affiliated with the Reverend Sun Myung Moon. I also began to see great similarities between these young people and my fellow Unificationists-both in our early days in our movement and now as we are attempting to live a more middle class life. I believe there are some great lessons to be learned here.

I find that I also owe them a great deal. I have recently brought my family to live in my hometown. If not for the progress of the past thirty years, I would not have been able to do this. Last year on the other side of town, skinheads firebombed a white couple's home because they had just adopted a black child. The perpetrators were caught and prosecuted. To date, I have not seen any overt acts of racism toward my children or myself. Therefore, I'm grateful that these young people had the vision and the courage to do what they did. When I search my own soul, I don't know if I could have done it.This book centers around the following individuals-Diane Nash, John Lewis, Bernard Lafayette, Curtis Murphy, Rodney Powell, Gloria Johnson, James Bevel, Marion Barry, Hank Thomas-and the adults who advised, were challenged by them, and worked with them-Martin Luther King, Jr., Kelly Miller Smith, Jim Lawson, C.T. Vivian, among others. I'll be honest with you, this is a long book. Yet I found the stories fascinating. Halberstam was very thorough. He covers the background and what brought each of these individuals into this situation, even family histories, and what happened to them afterward-i.e., how it changed their lives. The book is so well written that I find my points best made with direct quotations.

This is the story of the lunch counter sit-ins to de-segregate lunch counters, continuing on to the Freedom Rides and the campaigns for the black vote, including the influence of national television. The Brown vs. Board of Education decision in 1954 had laid the foundation for desegregation of schools. It was clearly only a matter of time before more than just the schools were desegregated. These students took it upon themselves, against the advice of their elders in Christ, their families, and their peers, to confront segregation head-on.

"An intuitive philosophy of the students in the Movement was ... born: The safer everything was, the less likely that anything important would take place. Changes would come only with risk; the greater the risk, the greater the change. The children were the first to understand that ... for they had not yet made the compromises which had been forced on their elders, and they were willing to resist those compromises, if need be, with their lives. They still lived in a world where the truth was absolute." (p. 276)

Lunch Counter Sit-ins

Jim Lawson was recruited by Martin Luther King and sent to Tennessee, after having spent some years in India and studying Gandhi and his teachings, where he taught workshops on non-violence which the students had attended. In these workshops, Jim Lawson taught two lessons. One, "that their numbers were not small because their idea was powerful." Two,

shedding the most powerful of all feelings-the shame of being black in a white nation which had chosen, as it suppressed its black citizens, to create a philosophy of shame and vulnerability among the very people whom it had suppressed and exploited, saying in effect that it was the victim's fault for turning out to be the victim. It was bad enough that white people seemed to accept this philosophy, but it was even worse that all too many blacks seemed to accept it as well.... In the process he had to destroy the cruel power of the magic word-nigger.... That was critical to the concept of Christian nonviolence. You are all someone, he taught, you are all children of God, you have within you the greatest of qualities, human nobility. (p. 77)

[T]he whole purpose of the Lawson ethic [was] to make people who were nominally your opponents get outside of their normal vision and see the human dimension wrought by segregation. (p. 237)

John Lewis' thoughts before the first sit-in were,

Jim Lawson had never tried to minimize the consequences-that some of them might even be killed. All they had was their faith, and they were bound together by that, he thought: faith in Jim Lawson as a teacher; faith in each other, that they would not let one another down at the moment of crisis; faith in what they believed was right; faith, curiously enough, in Nashville, a city they did not know and which had never been particularly generous or kind to them; faith in the country which would, they believed, somehow understand what they were doing and respond generously and support them; and finally, most of all, faith in their God, who would not allow His children to be punished for doing what was so obviously the right thing.... [H]e knew that it was also time to move ahead, and he liked the idea that as he entered this dangerous new world, he was not alone; that he was accompanied not only by his closest friends but, equally important, that he was acting on behalf of his God. He did not think of himself as being strong or brave, but he did believe that he had the requisite faith, and now he found in his faith the strength to go forward and do things which in another setting and under different conditions would have terrified him. (p. 106)

During one of the sit-ins, Jim Lawson began a conversation with the leader of the local toughs who were beating up two of the students.

In that brief frightening moment, Jim had managed to find a subject which they [Jim and the local gang leader] both shared and had used it in a way that made each of them more human in the eyes of the other.... It had been a marvelous example of Christian love for Bernard [Lafayette]. The lesson for Bernard Lafayette was obvious: It did not matter what the other person thought of you; it mattered only to do the right thing, to follow your conscience. In that split second of confrontation Jim Lawson had not only conquered his ego, he had forced his enemy I some basic way to try and see him as a man.... Too must time, he decided, was wasted in this country by people who worried how they looked to others, and too little time spent on simply trying to figure out what was the right thing to do. Christ had not worried about how he looked to others. If you did the right thing, he learned that day, it was all right to be misunderstood. (p. 138)

Kelly Miller Smith was the pastor for the local black Baptist Church.

Kelly Miller Smith had deflected the natural wariness of an older, more wearied generation with great skill; he had brought the young people into his church, had introduced them to his congregation, and he had lavishly praised what they were doing, outlining the terrible risks they were taking each time they set forth. And he had shrewdly chosen to refer to them not as the students. The children, he called them again and again, reminding the congregation that they were very young to be taking such chances, and suggesting as well that they were not alien blacks plunked down carelessly in this place, but the children of ordinary black people just like themselves, and could easily be the children of the congregation. They were the ones taking all the risks, he said, and they were doing it for all the people of Nashville, all the people of the South. (p. 177)

As for the American people, those ordinary people who lived outside the South, they were at that moment sitting on the fence. Americans liked to think of themselves as being above prejudice, and believing in both simple justice and elemental fair play.... Shown specific instances of injustice and brutality, the American people tended to sympathize with the victim. [C]ould those who were leading the Movement affect the national conscience in a way that would move the American political process forward on so broad a scale as to create a committed majority vision? That was the great question.... [T]hey had to lure the beast of segregation to the surface and show to ordinary Americans just exactly how it was that the leadership of the South maintained segregation ... by the exercise of raw and brutal police powers. (p. 254-255)

These students were very aware that there was a great possibility of dying during the Freedom Rides. They were riding into areas of the South in which segregation had a strong, brutal hold on the community. They only hoped that the federal government would intercede for their protection, but had no idea how or when that would take place.

Selma, Voters Rights and the Media

Early on, almost four years earlier when the Freedom Rides had first taken them into the Deep South, there had been no single, detailed strategy, but nonetheless they had all been building toward a showpiece battle in a showplace city on a defining issue for some time.... In some ways the Movement had been born with the Brown decision, and certainly there were all kinds of critical increments along the way-the violence of the Emmett Till murder, the real beginnings of nonviolent protest with the Montgomery bus boycott, and then ... the increasing pace of the assault on the Deep South.... Sometimes the price of what they were doing staggered even those who were the architects of the struggle, as in September 1963 on a Sunday morning when white segregationists ... had exploded a bomb in Birmingham's Sixteenth Street Baptist Church, killing four young black girls.... Its leadership's greatest achievement was in portraying to ordinary Americans the divided soul of the country. But now, as they began to hone in on Selma, the very forces that made it attractive as a showpiece battle also guaranteed that the struggle would be a bitter one. (p. 482-483)

On February 16th, C.T. Vivian lead about 25 demonstrators to the courthouse to attempt to register to vote. Jim Clark, the local sheriff, blocked their entrance. Soon they were engaged in a heated argument,

almost all of it captured dramatically by national television. The subject was Jim Clark's role in history. Vivian turned to Clark's deputies and said, "There were those who followed Hitler like you blindly follow this Sheriff Clark, who didn't think their day would come, but they were pulled into a courtroom one day and were given death sentences. You're not that bad a racist but you're a racist in the same way that Hitler was a racist and you're blindly following a man down a road that's going to bring you into a federal court...." "What kind of people do you think we are that we can be bowed and broken by your violence? What kind of people are you? What do you tell your children at night? What do you tell your wives at night?" But Jim Clark had had enough of a history lesson. "Arrest this man," he shouted to his deputies.... It was high-class drama, and much of the nation was able to see it that night on television. (p. 501-502)

Insights into the Individuals Involved

There is a great deal of information about all those involved. I choose to quote several examples here that demonstrate the faith these individuals and their sense of destiny. Over and over, the point was made that they continued because someone had to do it. They knew they did not want to see their children have to go through it, because they themselves were afraid. It had to be done, and they believed there was no other way to do it. It had been more than 100 years since slavery had been ended, yet in so many other ways it had not.

John Lewis: John Lewis was a country boy. He

simply did not posture. He made his decision, he chose his course, he accepted the consequences of his decision because he had decided on a greater purpose for his life. That was his great strength. It was impossible to separate religion from politics in his philosophy. If they did not accept the idea of death, then they could not move ahead. Hank Thomas had no doubts about John's commitment, but he had plenty of doubts about his own. For a moment he envied this stolid young man,... the envy of an inner spirituality which turned an ordinary man into a person of unwavering faith. (p. 261)

After the Voting Rights Act was passed, black nationalism began to surface. John Lewis thought

that there was a certain sadness in all this; they had started just a few years ago when the wall had seemed almost insurmountable, and in five years of continual struggle they had made gains which were beyond everyone's imagination and expectation. But now that they were at the pinnacle of success, after they had achieved these remarkable victories, they were not only divided, but it was as if they had lost sight of their own objectives.... He had always believed in an integrated community, both black and white, politically and economically just, where the barriers between his children and those of white people might be ever smaller. It was the beloved community which Jim Lawson had spoken of, and he refused to turn away from it; it was a place where everyone was equal, and where love was more powerful than fear. It was a vision which fewer and fewer of his colleagues believed in. (p. 521-522)

He believed that "in the end it would lead only to greater political isolation at a time when all too many blacks were isolated from the good things in American life."

James Bevel:

There was no doubt that [James] Bevel was a man with a special vision all his own. Even his trademark yarmulke seemed to signify it. By 1961, he had taken to wearing a yarmulke at all times. He did it in part because he wanted to honor the Old Testament prophets like Jeremiah and Ezekiel, whose strengths and truths he so greatly admired, and he did it as well because he thought of himself as being part Jewish. That is, he did not see how you could separate Judaism from Christianity; he did not see how anyone could be a Christian without being a Jew, or a Jew without being a Christian.... The effect of both the yarmulke and the shaved head was in some ways to sharpen the image of Bevel as the prophet, a biblical man who bore the teachings of the Old Testament with him at all times. Cross him, and you crossed all the other prophets. (Early on he had also started wearing old-fashioned country overalls as part of his own permanent protest of segregation-he did it in honor of all those black people who had been forced into poverty by racism.) (p. 437)

Jim Lawson: By 1968, Jim Lawson was a pastor in Memphis, having been transferred from Nashville. His reputation had preceded him.

They feared Lawson for the most interesting of all reasons-and I am indulging in psychiatry-they feared him because he was a totally moral man, and totally moral men you can't manipulate and you can't buy and you can't hustle ... and that's why they hung the label of super-radical on him. (p. 555)

Life after Protests

This is also the story of their lives after participating in such society-changing events. Halberstam chronicles what each of these individuals did with their lives after these events. The first to leave and resume mainstream life was Curtis Murphy.

Years later, after he had put his life back together, slowly and carefully, accommodating some of his expectations to his realities, he realized that he had been in a profound depression from the moment he had obeyed his father by walking away from the sit-in movement. It had been not only the most compelling experience of his life, but it had been the most fun.... Replacing a life so full with an ordinary life, one replete with the mundane and boring minutiae of daily existence, was much harder than he could have imagined; worse, it was done without any counseling. There was no school for former activists or revolutionaries where they told you how to get on with the rest of your life, and taught you how to become middle class again. (p. 460)

They did not think of themselves in those days as being gifted or talented or marked for success, or for that matter particularly heroic, and yet from that little group would come a senior U.S. congressman; the mayor of a major city; the first black woman psychiatrist to be tenured at Harvard Medical School; one of the most distinguished public health doctors in America; and a young man who would eventually come back to be the head of the very college in Nashville he now attended. Another of their group would become one of Martin Luther King's principal and most favored assistants, a young man who was so hypnotic a speaker that King often used him at major rallies as his warm-up speaker. Others would go on to lives which were relatively more mundane, and their days in this cause would remain the most exciting and stirring of their lives. (p. 7)

Summary

With the death of Martin Luther King, Jr., [t]he most obvious thing was that a singular era was over. It had begun in December 1955 in Montgomery, and it had lasted for twelve and a half years; the amount of change had been dramatic. Theirs had been a definable historic force unleashed in what was now, regrettably, a definable period.... The Movement had been predominantly black, although its aims were integrationist. Led as it was by black Southern ministers, it was religious, nonviolent, and marvelously and often clumsily democratic. It was ecumenical and above all, for people had often lost sight of this, it was optimistic. It was broad based, and it had constantly had one aim, to appear to the conscience of America. (p. 560-561)

I recommend this book to all who are concerned about racial issues, regardless of which races are involved. It is an excellent study of the attitudes necessary to change society at large. I hope we can all continue to make this world a better place.

Book review: The Cell Church

Reviewed by Chris Corcoran-NY, NY

The Cell Church, by Larry Stockstill, Regal Books, Ventura, California, 1998

"You will know them by their fruits. Grapes are not gathered from thorn bushes, nor figs from thistles, are they?" (Matthew 7:16)

Every Christian faith community has at its core the mission to spread God's word and save souls. Opportunities for harvesting these souls abound, from tent revivals to altar calls to simple one-on-one witnessing. Yet the initial inspiring aspect of revival is often the easy first step, containing the harvest from such witnessing is the tricky part. All churches suffer this problem in one way or another. For those interested in a viable way out of this predicament, read on.

Rev. Larry Stockstill, in his book, "The Cell Church," writes from his own experiences as a burned-out, over -burdened pastor, and provides us with a compelling blueprint on how to overcome the persistent problems surrounding church growth and management. For those of us more interested in developing the Family Federation, the same principles apply.

In a slim book of 136 pages, Stockstill recounts for us his journey, starting as a graduate of Oral Roberts University, doing missionary work in Africa with his wife, and then returning to America, where he eventually became senior pastor of a 5, 000-member Protestant church when his father retired from that position.

Like many pastors, Stockstill led revivals and outreach programs which brought an initial increase in church membership but eventually resulted in a zero-sum gain; as many people were drifting away out the back-door as were joining through the front. He had organized what seemed to him a good system of assigning new church members to mentoring and education classes. However, he began to realize that education classes and Sunday service weren't enough to keep members spiritually alive. The deep human bond which knits a faith community into a family was missing in his church. Also, as the senior pastor, he was the driving force behind all the church programs; if he wasn't doing the driving, then things weren't really moving ahead. Something had to change.

It was then that another pastor introduced him to the concept of the cell church. He was extremely skeptical; he knew the cell church idea had worked in China for decades and he also knew of the huge success of Dr. Yonggi Cho, pastor of the world's largest church in Seoul, Korea. Perhaps it was something in the Asian character that made the program so successful, thought Stockstill.

Through a series of affirmations from God, he pursued the cell church idea that he now found intriguing. Unable to find a successful American cell church to pattern his church after, he flew to El Salvador and studied a thriving cell church in San Salvador. Now he was convinced that the cell church concept wasn't just an Asian thing and that it could actually work for him.

What exactly is a cell church? First, let's get past the name. The actual name "cell church" is not necessary. For those of us who spent years battling against Marxism-Leninism, the word "cell" is rather odious. Call it neighborhood groups, home church, faith-based mentoring groups; it's not important. What's important is understanding the mechanics of the structure and the internal dynamics so that it can be replicated.

Many of us did and still do home church and Father has given us a wealth of knowledge upon which to draw. For me, Stockstill's ideas put the necessary flesh on the bones of what I already knew about pastoring. The recent direction from headquarters is for our pastors to model their outreach programs along the lines of the Chicago church (see Dr. Hendricks’ letters to church leaders: Chicago Report, Part One, 11/10/98, and Parts Two and Three, 11/12/98). The cell church ideas are a perfect fit for the Chicago model and in fact they already use many of the ideas.

"The cells are not an appendage, demanding attention like all the other programs (in the church); they ARE the program," writes Stockstill. In structure, the cells operate as weekly meetings in someone's home. There's a group leader who takes care of the purpose and direction of the cell and who reports to a zone leader. The zone leader then reports to a District Office leader who then reports to the pastor; this is simple enough (see "Moses: Wilderness"). This allows for two-way hierarchical communication with a geographical overlay. New members can easily join a cell close to their home.

Each cell consists of from six to fifteen people. When the cell grows to about 15, it splits and forms a new cell, and a new leader is raised up to take care of that cell. Ideally, the process repeats itself, much the same way the cells in the body replicate.

The nurturing, teaching and evangelism which takes place in the cell is the important part. Stockstill recommends alternating each weekly meeting between edification (teaching, testimonies, strengthening one's faith) and evangelism (devising and executing a specific witnessing plan). This inhale/exhale model helps keep the members balanced between nurturing their own souls and raising up new members. This purpose and focus also helps prevent the cell from degenerating into a "care group" mentality where the goal is simply fellowship and refreshments.

Stockstill proposes some ideas for the edification meetings. "The first week's 'planning and edification' gathering centers around meeting the needs of believers, doing spiritual warfare, releasing spiritual gifts and teaching on spiritual maturity. The following week's lesson centers on a 'felt need' topic (divorce, loneliness, depression, parenting, etc.), and the cell members invite their unsaved friends who may fall into that category," Stockstill writes.

On evangelism night, strategies are developed for outreach. It wasn't clear in the book, but I believe this would also be the time to actually visit new homes or street-witness. Stockstill describes in detail what he calls the four basic principles of evangelism: purpose, partnership, prayer and penetration. If a new guest happens to attend the evangelism meeting, the focus of the group shifts to the nurturing mode and the needs of the guest become paramount.

Not surprisingly, Stockstill's initial 54 cells in his church had doubled to 108 within six months. Interestingly, almost all the new cell members came from his own church, members who developed an interest in the revival fire and the soul-winning passion the cells exhibited. After one full year, church records showed that a net growth of 600 new families were added to his church. The loss of members through the "back door" had finally ceased. After three more years, 310 cells were in place and 2,000 more families had joined and stayed.

What's important to remember here is that the original cell members started the cell because they wanted to be more spiritually alive and spread their faith. No one should be pushed into a cell group. People should be drawn to the cell through feelings of joy and love and a longing to see their church grow.

The real secret to the success of cells, which for Unificationists should be no secret at all, is that the love and nurturing experienced in the intimate setting of someone's home is the key for church health and growth. The cell becomes an extended family where everyone is automatically cared for and embraced.

Sunday service still has its place as a time for high-powered fellowship. Also, Stockstill recommends that children go to the home of the cell meeting and receive religious education during the more adult discussion-time of the cell. That eliminates the need for hiring baby-sitters.

This well-thought-out book is really for anyone looking for witnessing and church growth inspiration and guidance. Stockstill's inspired testimony of success propelled me to try this method in my own faith community. How it turns out will be material for another article, reporting what I hope will be a successful outcome.