Big Brother's Biography - Part One

This month I am going to look at one of the most revered, dreaded, and least understood aspects of the modern world, the Internet. And at the freedom, or slavery, that it now offers us. This article will be in two parts.

British author George Orwell popularized the term `Big Brother' in his famous novel 1984. Others also warned of such a future. Ever since, people have dreaded the advent of this all-seeing superstate.

It hasn't worked out in quite the way Orwell envisioned, but it's already bad enough. North Korea uses hordes of ridiculously low-tech snoops to keep a sharp eye on everything. Here, American pundits refer to a `Nanny State,' a Big Sister run by feminists who loudly proclaim their compassion-but don't hesitate to call in the lawyers-or as at Waco, the Army tanks.

Big Brother is understood to rely on High Technology, thus to make the State literally all-seeing. Yet Big Brother was once an infant, and he relied on methods that seem primitive today.

Technology has people so awed that it is often spoken of in whispers, and ever greater powers are attributed to it. It even has its `negos,' who preach "disconnection from the Net," and a return to supposedly simpler times. For good or ill, modern technology is pretty amazing.

Sometimes hi-tech breakthroughs come from young students tinkering in their garage, and sometimes from teams of white-coated technicians, governmental or private. You never know which it'll be. This very April, two Stanford dropouts became multimillionaires by founding the `Yahoo!' Internet guide company-without even planning to.

For longer than you might think, the technological initiative, and the battle for its control, has seesawed between individualist tinkerers and organized government projects. "Government is power," and it naturally fears that which gives more power to the ordinary people-for they "just might" get out of control, or pass important things to an enemy.

This article focuses on that which makes Big Brother so pervasive: computers and communications. Of course, governments (to varying degrees) also seek to control travel, trade and written communication.

Earliest Net

The earliest forms of the Internet, utilizing transmitted data, were invented thousands of years ago. The Bronze Age Greeks set up a mountaintop chain of signal fires as a way to pass along simple news. Homer tells us that such a signal brought home news of the Greek victory in the Trojan War, more than 3,000 years ago. Thanks to Hollywood, we've all heard of American Indian `smoke signals,' and native African `talking drums.' Surprisingly, the movies got these depiction's nearly right.

In the early days of the Industrial Revolution, the French set up a unique communication system, a line-of-sight series of semaphore towers, creating a link between several cities. Skilled operators could move each tower's twin `paddles,' and thus transmit data, at an amazingly fast rate. The system, built in 1794, could carry a message the 144 miles from Lille to Paris in two minutes.

The discovery of electricity brought a new leap in speed and data capacity to the embryonic Net. Samuel Morse invented the electric telegraph in 1835, along with the Morse Code it uses. His wife had died while he was far away, and out of touch. He taught himself enough about "that newfangled electricity" to invent the system, in order that no loved one would ever again have to die alone.

Morse's Western Union company, together with the American government, set up the first telegraph lines in the late 1830s. A working transatlantic cable was laid in 1866, linking America with Europe. During wartime these telegraph lines often became primary targets.

Western Union dominated the communications industry until the 1870s, when Alexander Graham Bell and Theodore Vail's Bell Telephone company largely replaced it. In an event filled with premonition, the new phone company had terrible trouble with its first operators-impudent teenage boys. They soon began hiring young women instead.

One British official is often quoted as an example of shortsightedness, for he said that while "America needs these new telephones, England does not, for we have plenty of messenger boys." What the wags don't tell you is that this same man eventually did oversee the instillation of England's phone system.

Radio

In 1895 the Italian scientist Marconi invented radio, and dependence on physical wires was eliminated. By 1901 he had sent signals across the Atlantic, using Morse Code. The military establishments of many nations took immediate interest. Private commerce soon got involved, and today, several American radio stations claim the title of `oldest.' The first successful broadcaster was San Jose, California's `Doc' Herrold, in 1912. He used his now-obsolete `arc phone' spark transmitter. His wife Sybil played gramophone music over the air, and was probably the first disk jockey.

America's First Amendment had always applied to the print media, but government took a different tack with radio and its successors. They began by assigning broadcast frequencies. The airwaves were declared a `public trust,' and licensing requirements were set forth. The former seemed a necessary role, while the latter has caused endless controversy.

Soon there were several commercial stations, and many more amateur operators. During World War One the Navy Department shut down all amateur radios, citing "security concerns." In 1919 a government inspector censored New York City's first and only radio station-for "playing unseemly music!"

During World War Two, spies and infiltrators relied heavily on secret radio transmissions. Massive Allied (and corresponding Axis) efforts were made to listen in on all radio transmissions, and to track down any suspicious ones. New and ever more devious codes were both invented and broken.

Philo Farnsworth invented television in 1935, though it did not come into widespread use until the 1950s. This eventually lead to the development of the VCR and miniature video camera, with both fixed and handheld versions. These have altered society in very many ways.

As the wags now say, "If it wasn't caught on video, it didn't happen." But when something is filmed, big things can happen. Just ask southern California.

Computers

Traditional communications, from telegraphs to television, are limited in many ways. Telephones connected only two people at a time, while TVs worked in only one direction. It wasn't until the advent of computers that these devices were able do more. Entirely new -and often unforeseen- functions become possible.

For Big Brother to be an effective menace, many millions of people must be watched, all at once. Humans alone could not handle such a vast undertaking-but computers can.

The original computers were complex gear-driven `calculating engines.' (Such as Babbidge's Difference Engine.) The first electronic computers were developed during W.W.II, to break clever German and Japanese codes. (Read The Ultra Secret by F.W. Winterbotham.)

The invention of the transistor, then the integrated-circuit chip, enabled computers to shrink from room to pocket size. Defying generations of skeptics, this miniaturization continues apace.

These tiny chips have other functions besides calculating. In recent months microscopic electric motors have been developed, which could eventually power machines and robots the size of fleas, or smaller. Tiny radars can now protect car bumpers, operate household switches, and more.

For good or ill, video cameras the size of postage stamps are now available. With infrared sensors and wireless connections, these cameras can secretly watch, always and anywhere, even in the dark. Surely this is a key aspect of Big Brother.

Such chip-based devices would be of limited use if they needed to be `accessed' by hand, one by one. However, they can be, and usually are, connected. This vast interlocking web is now called the Internet.

Here we shall pause until next month.

Errata:

In my recent "Sheepenization," the town troubled by false child abuse accusations is not Ellensburg, Washington, but nearby Wenatchee. Sorry.

Artists Association for World Peace/New York City Symphony

by Michael Davies-NYC

The beginning of the new year has brought about the renewal of several cultural activities in the New York and New Jersey regions. The New York City Symphony has become a staple of the Woman's Federation for World Peace conferences in New York and Philadelphia and the newly formed Artists Association for World Peace has been presenting a series of Culture Nights in the Garden Room at National Headquarters in New York City.

At the December WFWP conference in New York, David Eaton led the New York City Symphony in performances of Christmas music as part of the conference's closing banquet proceedings. Joining the orchestra were vocalists ___, Sheila Vaughn, Raoul Joseph and Miyuki Harley performing songs of the season and so successful was this concert that the orchestra was invited by WFWP to perform in Philadelphia and has since been providing the main entertainment for WFWP conferences in both cities.

Raoul and Miyuki have been performing songs from their new album If Love Is The Answer, with the orchestra in a "pops" setting. The music from their album, which was produced at Manhattan Center Studios by David Eaton, has been well received by the WFWP audiences which may be due in part to the fact that Miyuki Harley's parents were American and Japanese.

The highlight of the New York City Symphony's spring season was a performance at the Manhattan Center on True Parent's Day. The program opened with Mozart's Serenade No. 3, K. 185 and featured Japanese soprano Yoshimi Kadota who sang the Ave Maria by French composer Charles Gounod as well a the beautiful Korean art song Ga Go Pa as arranged by David Eaton.

The New York City Symphony Chamber Ensemble has been appearing at several of the WFWP events as well as the biweekly cultural events sponsored by Artists Association for World Peace. The ensemble, which is comprised of soprano ___, violinist Makiko Taguchi, pianist Rikako Asanuma and guitarist, Isamu Nakashio, has been presenting music from their recently released album entitled World Music, a compilation of art songs from 10 different countries.

True Parents founded the Artists Association for World Peace in Brazil on True Parents Day in 1995. At that time Father instructed David Eaton, Gloria Criscioni, Paraguay's most renown singer, and soprano ___ to concertize in order to network with other artists and to begin the process of "creating a moral revolution in the arts."

AAWP/A Moral Vision for the Arts

During the course of each culture night, David Eaton has been giving a short presentation on the goals, vision and future activities of AAWP. One hope of this new organization is to create a worldwide network of artists who will be willing to utilize their talents in a responsible fashion.

Alluding to the situation in Nazi Germany in the 1930's, Mr. Eaton explains of the plight of the twentieth century German composer Paul Hindemith. When Adolph Hitler was rising to power, Hindemith was considered Germany's most talented composer but refused to join the Nazi Party at a time when many of his colleagues were using Nazi influence to further their careers. As a result of rejecting the Nazi ideology, Hindemith was vilified by the authorities and soon found his music in official disfavor which led to a self imposed exile from his native Germany.

For Hindemith, music had "moral and ethical power," and thus he felt that musicians needed to use that power with what he called "...the severest sense of moral responsibility." Citing the postulates of early Christian philosophers Boethius and St. Augustine, Hindemith recognized (as did Hitler) that art had a tremendous ability to influence society and therefore artists must exercise a degree of personal responsibility vis-a-vis their chosen artistic discipline. In many ways, AAWP espouses Hindemith's view of the arts and the role of artists in creating an environment conducive to the goal of establishing world peace.

AAWP and the New York City Symphony will continue to present culture nights throughout the coming months as well as the orchestra will continue to perform for the WFWP Sisterhood conferences.

To purchase the NYCSCE World Music cassette tape, or Raoul and Miyuki's If Love Is The Answer tape, send a check or money order in the amount of $12 to the New York City Symphony, 481 Eighth Avenue, New York, NY 10001.

A Beacon of Hope: RYS Project in Croatia

by Marshall de Souza-London, UK

Following last year's project when a group of forty-five worked to improve the living conditions of refugees in northern Croatia, a much more challenging prospect was at stake a year later. The Religious Youth Service (RYS) was invited to organize a 'follow-up' project in Dalmatia (what the Serbs called Krajina). What occurred was truly commendable, given the fact that time to plan and work was very short, money was extremely limited, and RYS expertise meant literally a handful of people. But, as the saying goes, "where there's a will, there's a way." So, on Easter Sunday, April 7th, the forty participants and staff, supported in many ways by the International Relief Friendship Foundation (IRFF) and the Women's Federation for World Peace (WFWP), completed a job well done!

Most of the participants arrived on Thursday, March 28th. Those who made it in the morning, were called to duty even before the project officially began. They had to clean and prepare four rooms that were to be used for sleeping. As a special treat for their unconditional effort, the director of the Out-patient's Clinic where we were to do the physical work, took everyone out to a restaurant for a lovely meal. Officially, the project began at 9:00 am the next morning. Eighteen countries (Iceland, Ireland, England, Sweden, Spain, Chile, Germany, Mongolia, Japan, Korea, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Romania, Slovenia, USA, Russia, Austria and Croatia) were represented, and included the religious traditions of Christianity (Catholic and Orthodox), Buddhism and Unificationism.

When one uses the word 'challenging', it is because most things which were planned weeks ahead, had to be thrown out of the window (and there were not a shortage of broken ones)! For a start, the planned project was the restoration of a kindergarten in Drnis. That was changed at the last minute because of some uncertainty and is postponed for the future. Instead the major work for this project was to be the preparation of four rooms and toilet facilities for an Out- patients' Clinic in the town of Oklaj, some 14 Km from Drnis. This work took place in a large building that was very badly destroyed, and this 'mission' was very urgent because a make-shift clinic was being used at someone's house until now, and the owners were to return by Easter. Hence the dire need for another facility.

In Drnis, where the participants were offered living quarters by the Head of the Out-patient's Clinic, several jobs were accomplished: it was possible to clean and paint the garage for ambulances, fix the roof, which was a major task in itself, and paint two offices. The work in the garage really tested those who worked there. They practiced the true meaning of humility, for the work was especially dirty, greasy and wet. Both sites (Drnis and Oklaj) also included working in the environment. The participants had the opportunity to tidy up and creatively design the compounds around the buildings which were being restored.

One has to bear in mind the degree of difficulty in working in this area. The Croatians had to flee their homes and work places four years ago. Since the liberation of these lands last August (1995), people are returning home, only to find destruction and chaos. Houses, shops, schools, factories, telegraph poles and electricity pylons (the necessities of life) were either damaged badly or destroyed completely. On skirting the area, one finds ruined tanks and unexploded mines, among other things. It is not surprising that these people are fearful and skeptical of others. Inevitably, one could also find a few selfless activists, working for the sake of others like 'modern-day Mother Theresas'. Two of our key local helpers were such people: the head of the social (actually tireless) workers, and the head of the Out-patients' Clinic. Without their support, this project would have lacked spirit and would have been much, much more challenging. In addition to giving necessary help, these two women also took it on themselves to take our participants to places of interest, and there were several of them. They also made it a point to attend as many of our educational and cultural programs as possible.

The Orientation began at 9:00 am on Friday, March 29th. The key people involved in holding the Orientation were Marshall de Souza (Overall Director), Marica Kampic (Local Coordinator) and Jurgen Schipper (Education Director). After the Welcome, an introduction to RYS was given, and that was followed by self-introductions. A discussion on the Norms of RYS followed the Break. The participants were placed into groups in order to come up, on poster paper, with their Vision for RYS. A representative then gave his or her group's vision, which was often done quite dramatically. After Lunch, Fears and Expectations were discussed, and that was followed by Listening Check (a test to determine how much we truly listen to others). Following a short break, a very interesting and popular exercise on people's character was done. Through this exercise one can see how one reacts under normal and stress conditions. People usually fall into one of the three characteristics of "Warm Blue St. Bernard" or "Cool Green Fox" or "Red Hot Lion" (attend RYS to find out what these mean!). Then, followed Dinner, after which an Explanation of the Work and Safety was given. And, last, but not least, the Purpose of Teams during the project was described, and the names of the four team leaders and the team members were read out.

Many participants expected only to serve the unfortunate people while they were in Croatia by working during the whole time. Whilst service is an integral part of the RYS, and surely, a lot of cleaning, scraping, sanding, painting, digging, weeding, planting and other jobs were done, there are also two other important aspects of the RYS: education and culture. Because RYS sees youth as being the leaders of tomorrow, care is taken to develop educational programs. Apart from the Orientation, other sessions were also organized during the project. They included: a youth forum on Why we Serve, a talk on Team Building, and a discussion on How to Prevent Wars. A number of participants commented in their reflections that they could see the value of the education that was offered to them.

There is Orientation, there is Work, and then there is the Reflection. The latter is the opportunity given to participants to reflect on what they had learnt or accomplished during the project. Questions such as: How has RYS changed your life? or What did you understand or do that you did not understand or do before? or What did you overcome or tolerate during the project? were asked at the beginning of the Reflection.

Regarding culture, there were many occasions when participants could perform something from their nation; also football and basketball games with local youth were played. Most of all, at the Cultural Evening where local residents were invited, the groups performed what they had prepared. Some items were hilarious; others were down right unusual. In any case, there was something for everyone to enjoy. The Japanese members of the WFWP organized a beautiful children's program of songs and origami at a small kindergarten for thirty children. In addition to all this, a day was spent in the beautiful resort of Sibenik, all were treated to the immensely scenic Krka National Park, which proudly boasts the unimaginable series of water falls.

On Easter Sunday, everyone attended Mass at the Franciscan monastery on the island of Visovac in the middle of the Krka river. Itself an historical monument, this monastery which was built in the 15th Century, has survived attacks from different enemies, and never once have the monks abandoned it. The Mass was followed by a breath-taking boat ride on the river, which then suitably prepared everyone for a picnic lunch on the shores. The final event took place that evening. It was the Closing Dinner. Wonderful food was served, after which many presentations were made. Each participant received a Certificate of Appreciation from Marica Kampic, the local host and coordinator. Several gifts were exchanged as well. Well into the night, chatting and sharing continued, leading up to the next day's farewells, always a sad, but inevitable, event at the RYS!

In conclusion, a remarkable amount of work was accomplished, given that time was short and finances were limited. The four rooms were ready to be used as an Out-patient's Clinic; the garage looked beautiful and had a healthy roof; the grounds at both sites looked very decent. Interest in the project came from national television, local radio and national newspapers. Very importantly, the RYS helped to make some transformation in the hearts of the local people. Whilst difficult at the beginning, many natives opened up later, greeted our participants, or even invited some of them to coffee at their homes. If they felt more hope for the future because of the RYS' investment, then it made the project all the more worthwhile. There were, along the way, some misunderstandings, admittedly; some things had to re- done because of unforeseen problems. Two things will always stand out regarding this RYS project: first, it took place in an unusual area, under difficult conditions; and secondly, many capable leaders came to the project to learn how to do their own RYS in their own country. Ask the representatives from the C.I.S. or Romania. Humble though it was, it was a project that ended well, and left people with a lot to reflect about.

Marshall de Souza is the RYS Coordinator in the UK

Upcoming RYS projects

RYS Great Britain, Birmingham, Aug. 27"Sept. 8
RYS Taiwan, Taipei: Aug. 21"31
RYS Honduras: RYS project, June 22"June 30
RYS Honduras: Eco Tour, July 1"2
RYS Romania: Transylvania, Aug. 1"11

For information, contact: John Gehring, 4 West 43rd Street, NY NY 10036.

212-869-6023 ext. 429. fax 212-869-6424

May 1996

World Unificationist Student Review Publishes First Issue

by Gareth Davies-Barrytown, NY

Seven UTS students representing virtually every continent of the world, as well as both the Divinity and Religious Education programs, recently joined together to create UTS's first student-initiated and student-supported theological review. The first monthly, 20-page issue, published March 1, included student articles on Indemnity, the Third Blessing and the role of international blessed couples; an article introducing the review; an interview with Dr. Mickler, UTS Academic Dean; a short story feature; an editorial on the meaning of "family," and a review of Carlos Rangel's study of Latin America, From the Noble Savage to the Noble Revolutionary.

According to WUSR editor Christopher Mckeon, WUSR hopes, in succeeding issues, "to receive submissions from UTS graduates, faculty and others who have something serious to say about Unificationism in both the American and world context." He notes that Dr. Kathy Winings, Dr. Dietrich Seidel and Dr. David Carlson have agreed to become the first members of WUSR's Academic Advisory Board whose purpose is to help the Review to develop and maintain high academic and professional standards.

The hope is to quickly develop a large and diverse Editorial Advisory Board from among UTS graduates and friends worldwide to help with the process of soliciting and receiving submissions, as well as furthering WUSR's subscriber base.

Subscriptions for ten issues per year cost $25 in the U.S. and $35 per year for foreign subscribers. Anyone who would like to participate in or subscribe to this review is invited to contact WUSR by writing to WUSR, c/o Christopher Mckeon, 10, Dock Road, Barrytown, NY 12507. The e-mail address is studentrev@aol.com or cmckeon@mhv.net.

Reprinted from The Cornerstone.

UTS Profiles: Stanley Lewis

by Debbie Truin-Barrytown, NY

This is one in an occasional series of testimonies about students at the seminary.

Stanley Lewis joined the Unification Movement in Guyana in 1992 and came to UTS in January of this year. He began teaching the Divine Principle to new guests at the national headquarters in the capitol city of Georgetown after only two weeks as a member.

As the main lecturer for the "Free Teens" seminars from 1992-1994 he taught at high schools, universities and to various youth groups throughout the country and was often called upon by teachers to counsel their students. He also started a "Free Teens" chapter in Guyana.

Stanley has many spiritual children, four of whom were blessed in the 360,000 Blessing in 1995. Stanley was Blessed in August, 1992 and when he returned from the Blessing, he sat down and wrote to the President of Guyana explaining the mission of the Reverend and Mrs. Moon in relation to the social problems facing their country. He also brought him a copy of the Divine Principle, a photo of True Parents and a picture of himself. He hand carried them to the President's office. Three days later he received a thank you letter from the President in which he expressed his appreciation for the work of True Parents.

In 1993 and 1995, the President attended Federation for World Peace events and, in 1995, received the Blessing. When asked what prompted him to write to the President Stanley responded, "For me, Principle has all the answers that one needs about God, life and the universe. It is a blueprint. So I thought, "If I can get the head of this country to accept the blueprint, then God can direct the country through him." Stanley's undergraduate background is in communications and he is simultaneously working on completing that degree through Regents college while attending UTS. Stanley says his goals have become very big since learning Divine Principle and he wants to make a substantial contribution to God's Providence by 2007. He plans to get a Ph.D. and to become president of his country.

The Guyanese movement has approximately 80 members, many of whom are doctors, lawyers and other upper level members of society, the national leader, Ronald McGarrell, is a native of Guyana. There is little opposition to the movement and it is easy to witness there. People are generally open and friendly. Most members live at home and about 20 members live in a center. The church runs an orphanage (perhaps the first in the Unification Movement) for children between 4 and 15 years of age. The center members street witness and raise funds for the orphanage. The Church also has a video production company which is moderately successful.

Reprinted from The Cornerstone.

The Issue That Will Not Abort

uViews April

The debate over abortion is a major controversy in America today. Certainly the number of abortions carried out in this country each year overwhelms the senses: in the range of 1.3 to 1.5 million abortions take place yearly. 70% to 80% of Americans disapprove abortion, agreeing essentially with Mr. Clinton's sound-byte: "abortions should be safe, legal and rare."

"Safe, legal and rare" is a mixing of categories which slips through the brain unnoticed. "Safety" is a medical issue, one which at least on the physical level is under control. "Legality" is a juridical issue, one which the courts at present have under control. "Rarity," however, is a moral issue, one which is not at all under control. Perhaps the President would consider that two out of three is not a bad average, but the chaos in the third category compromises the significance of the first two.

First of all, safety and legality are objective terms, but "rarity" is relative to the beholder. The call for abortions to be rare begs the question: what constitutes rare abortions? If I eat a hamburger once a year, for an American, that is rare. Is a woman having an abortion once a year rare? How about once in a lifetime? (Here I raise the question of whether the Chinese, who reportedly eat aborted fetuses, prefer them rare-but only as an effort to neutralize the viability of our president's sound-byte. "Safe, legal and rare," indeed.)

The problem is that the simple announcement that abortion is legal undermines its rarity. The rationale for legality and rarity is that there are occasions in which abortion is proper, specifically those of rape and deformity. But the problem arises as to who is to judge which relationship was a rape, and what degree of deformity we are talking about.

But the toughest issue, the line in the sand between pro-choice and pro-life, is the status of the unborn in terms of its humanity. Pro- choice sees the fetus as non-human. Pro-life see the fetus as fully human. For pro-choice, abortion is minor surgery; for pro-life it is murder. There the matter sits, a battleground, and society has no authority established which can decide the matter once and for all.

This issue goes beyond theological debate when we refer again to the millions abortions in America, and to the Clintons' work to promote the pretentious "safe, legal and rare" abortioning worldwide through the UN. Consider that the pro-life movement has been termed the forefront of the battle to overturn the sexual revolution, and that the sexual revolution is the launching pad of the self-destruction of the American civilization. Consider comments of George Weigel, President of the Ethics and Public Policy Center, Washington, DC:

"There" is one causal factor that sheds light on a lot of the rest of the crisis, and one issue that brings the crisis home inescapably: the causal factor is the sexual revolution, and the issue is abortion." (Colson and Neuhaus, Evangelicals and Catholics Together [Dallas: Word Publishing, 1995], p. 63.)

Many conservative religious and academic leaders view abortion as the frontline of the battle for America's soul, including Charles Colson, Richard Neuhaus, George Weigel and Jerry Falwell. Like it or not, it has become the watershed issue, the dividing line in the culture war. On one side array the profamily forces, on the other, everyone from the silent majority to the pro-choice activists. Where do we Unificationists stand? Until now we have stood with the silent majority who disapprove abortion but felt it should not be an object of legislation and politicization. We would not establish a unilateral yes or no. Where should we stand? We are profamily; why, one might ask, do not we make common cause with the profamily movement in America?

Unification is not a legalistic tradition. We do not set hard and fast laws in areas of ethics and morality. For instance, we have no rule against smoking or consuming alcohol. And yet, instances of such are extremely rare among members. I hope that it means the law is "written in our hearts," and hence law codes are unnecessary. In America's colonial and early national period, common wisdom had it that lawyers were present in inverse proportion to the effectiveness of a town's clergy. And now, I am told, there are more lawyers in Washington, DC, than in the entire nation of Japan.

In fact I have witnessed the recalcitrance of our Asian elders to set unilateral laws. "Case-by-case" is a familiar expression for us. It rubs against our grain to set universal codes of behavior, of crime and punishment. What we lose in consistency, we can gain in "human- heartedness." We are the friends of Jean Valjean, resisting the ruthless legalism of Janvier. But with the question of abortion"ah, here the rubber meets the road.

Our book of church practices, entitled The Tradition, states that abortion is permissible in case of severe deformity. The theological grounding here is, first, that "the fundamental concern [is] that the order of the cosmos not be interrupted." (Kwak, The Tradition Book One [New York: HSA-UWC, 1985], all citations from pp. 162-3) What is the order of the cosmos? It is expressed as the Principle of Creation, having to do with the sanctity of sex, eternality of marriage, extremely high valuation of children and families, parental responsibility, submission to the will of God, and so forth. The Tradition states that "We cannot presuppose God's will. Perhaps God has special plans for that child [in the womb] to influence future history." (Ibid., p. 163)

This teaching is given historical flesh in our understanding of God's regard for Esau and Jacob while still in Rebekah's womb (Rom 9:10-13), and even greater attention paid to the providential action of Perez and Zerah while in Tamar's womb (Gen 38:27-30). Perez pulled Zerah back into the womb and made his way out of the birth channel first. This is viewed as a foundation of substance removing the fallen nature, reversing Cain's murder of Abel, purifying the womb for the Messiah's birth, and completing the providential work of Jacob and Esau. It is hard to imagine that such could be credibly accomplished by anything other than fully human agents within the womb.

A further expansion of Principle, of relatively recent vintage, is that of the "three stages of life," the first being in the womb, the second on earth and the third in spirit world. Reverend Moon and others teachers often explain the importance of maintaining a peaceful atmosphere around a pregnant woman, for the benefit of the baby inside. Just last week in his True Parents' Day speech, Reverend Moon chastised women who fight with others while they are pregnant. The baby inside is affected by what it and its mother sees, hears and feels.

The Tradition states further that "God personally attends the creation of new life" in the womb, and that "the relationship of love between the parents and child is part of the law of the cosmos." Reverend Moon in recent years has expanded his teachings concerning the presence of God in the creative act of conjugal love, terming the sex organs the most precious components of God's creation and their unification "the palace of true love" and dwelling place of God.

Reverend Moon rarely speaks directly on abortion. My good friend Michael Kiely did a word search of 322 of Reverend Moon's speeches, and found two direct references. The first, spoken May 14, 1978, appears in the midst of a discourse on family relations:

"Now you know for sure why it is better to live with your in-laws. Unless you have loved three children, you can never say you have experienced the love of parents. Do you still have the concept of family planning, using contraception and having abortions? How many children would you like to have? If you only have two you still have further to go. You should have at least three."

The second came on April 26, 1992, and it is more direct:

" a great child will be born to you. Father has warned you about the difficulties you may have to face, but your Blessing is not for yourself but for your children and the world. There is much debate about abortion. Abortion is wrong. A fetus is more than just a few cells. It represents love, life and lineage and by killing it you will kill the parents. You must guard the fetus with your life. What if Father's mother had Father aborted? Impossible!"

I will offer some biblical reflections next month on this issue.

[Part Two next month]

Study-In-Korea Program

Spending Winter in Korea

Homestay is for our students during winter vacation in which a student will go to a Korean blessed family's home for a week to experience the local flavor. The students share some of their insights and happenings in the following questions and answers:

QUESTION: How did your actual experience compare with your expectation?

ANSWER: I thought I would be lonely, frustrated and unable to eat the food. I was very wrong. It was a nice wholesome family which gave me excellent food, egg drop soup was my favorite so I got a lot of it. I was rarely bored and had a lot of fun. Young IL Loew

ANSWER: I expected the food to be better than our dorm's food. I was right. I expected that I wouldn't become friends with the children. I was wrong. I became good friends with the twins. I expected their home to be far away. I was wrong because it was an easy walk home. Jin'ae Mitchem.

QUESTION: What was your best experience?

ANSWER: My best experience at homestay was visiting the tiny church of 12 people. It was cozy and as we watched a video about True Parents I could feel everyone really proud of them, beaming and gazing at the movie. It was moving and cute. Miwa Krishnek

QUESTION: How was your experience using the Korean language?

ANSWER: I was surprised because I could understand more Korean than I expected. I learned a lot of Korean words and phrases. It was good that they only spoke Korean because before I hadn't tried to speak it, and since that's all they spoke I was able to practice what I knew. Jin'ae Mitchem

ANSWER: I used about everything I could. I said when I was tired, hungry (though they usually would ask me), wanted to watch a movie, buy gifts and hello and thank you. But there was one weird thing: every time I said "Hello" when the dad came home, the mom and two sons would laugh at me. I still don't know why. Young IL Loew

QUESTION: What did you learn about the Korean way of doing things?

ANSWER: I learned about the Korean way of eating meals at the table. I did a lot of rude things that I didn't realize, so I learned from these mistakes. I also learned that their schedule is different and they do a lot more things in their spare time. Mamina Turegano

ANSWER: I learned that Koreans put a lot more heart in the things they do. They are very humble, too. In Korea, everyone will take off their shoes at the door. They study so much more than we Westerners. Everything I learned at homestay is how I would like to live. Miyoung Brogan

QUESTION: What most important lesson did you learn about the heart of God?

ANSWER: I understand the mother's heart of God, the mother's side. She is humble and loving and always giving her best for her children. She is always happy for her children. Then they try their best. Betty Moloney

ANSWER: I learned that God made His children all very different. Thought it doesn't look like it sometimes, we all have hearts, no matter the country, race, city or household we may be from. Miwa Krishnek